Living Wage: A UK perspective
The living wage is gaining momentum in the UK. We look at its costs and benefits, which sectors have the most exposure to the issue and the impact of its implementation on corporate margins.
26 March 2015
In summary, we find that the costs and benefits of introducing the living wage include:
- Higher costs per employee
- A negative impact on corporate earnings (particularly in the retail sector, where there is a larger number of sub-living wage earners)
- Additional costs if a company wishes to maintain wage differentials across its workforce
- Lower employee turnover (studies have shown that paying a living wage has increased employee motivation and loyalty)
- Lower absenteeism
- Increased productivity (especially where the living wage has been introduced alongside an up-skilling programme)
- Improved customer satisfaction and lower complaints
- A greater ability to attract and retain talent
- Living wage earners see an increase in disposable income, which is then spent elsewhere in the economy (retailers, restaurants and bars are likely to benefit from this)
Retail sector most exposed in the UK
Research suggests that the hotels, restaurants and leisure sub-sector employs the largest proportion of sub-living wage workers.
For example, the graph below highlights that 90% of bar staff earn less than the living wage, but the retail sector employs the largest absolute number of sub-living wage workers with 760,000 UK-based workers.
So for investors, this may mean a higher level of employee turnover and lower productivity per employee than other sectors.
Figure 1: Occupations with greatest number of people below living wage: all UK
Source: Living wage research for KPMG, Markit, 2014.
Savings partially offset the costs in UK retail sector
Our proprietary research highlights a material cost in reaching living wage, ranging between 1 – 2% of UK revenues. However, the potential savings achieved through lower absenteeism and lower turnover offsets between 16% to 36% of these additional costs.
While the range of potential benefits is broad, we note that speciality retailers are best placed to benefit from introducing the living wage.
With higher margins, it is more feasible to invest in staff, and the resulting improvement in customer service is likely to have a greater impact on sales, as demonstrated by two case studies which are presented in the full article at the link below.
An important part of Schroders’ engagement strategy
As part of Schroders’ engagement strategy, we have spoken to a number of different companies across the consumer sector on the topic of living wage.
While very few consumer companies have become accredited living wage employers, there is some evidence of pay increases and up-skilling programmes. Schroders will continue to engage with companies to better understand the costs and potential benefits that can be gained from introducing a living wage on a case by case basis.
There is increasing pressure from a broad range of stakeholders on companies to pay a living wage. While there are clear direct costs, especially on corporate earnings, the benefits appear significant (although these may be difficult to directly quantify).
We find that the cost and benefits differ not only between sectors, but also within sectors. Indeed, the costs and benefits are greater for the retail and leisure sector, and within this sector, it may be more feasible to pay a higher wage amongst speciality retailers.
In our view, the issues of the living wage should therefore be considered on an individual basis.
Please find the full article at the link below
Important Information: The views and opinions contained herein are those of the author(s) on this page, and may not necessarily represent views expressed or reflected in other Schroders communications, strategies or funds. This material is intended to be for information purposes only and is not intended as promotional material in any respect. The material is not intended as an offer or solicitation for the purchase or sale of any financial instrument. It is not intended to provide and should not be relied on for accounting, legal or tax advice, or investment recommendations. Reliance should not be placed on the views and information in this document when taking individual investment and/or strategic decisions. Past performance is not a reliable indicator of future results. The value of an investment can go down as well as up and is not guaranteed. All investments involve risks including the risk of possible loss of principal. Information herein is believed to be reliable but Schroders does not warrant its completeness or accuracy. Some information quoted was obtained from external sources we consider to be reliable. No responsibility can be accepted for errors of fact obtained from third parties, and this data may change with market conditions. This does not exclude any duty or liability that Schroders has to its customers under any regulatory system. Regions/ sectors shown for illustrative purposes only and should not be viewed as a recommendation to buy/sell. The opinions in this material include some forecasted views. We believe we are basing our expectations and beliefs on reasonable assumptions within the bounds of what we currently know. However, there is no guarantee than any forecasts or opinions will be realised. These views and opinions may change. To the extent that you are in North America, this content is issued by Schroder Investment Management North America Inc., an indirect wholly owned subsidiary of Schroders plc and SEC registered adviser providing asset management products and services to clients in the US and Canada. For all other users, this content is issued by Schroder Investment Management Limited, 31 Gresham Street, London, EC2V 7QA. Registered No. 1893220 England. Authorised and regulated by the Financial Conduct Authority.