Thought Leadership (Professional Only)
Building and measuring outcome-oriented investment strategies
For too long there has been little connection between real-world investment problems and the way portfolios built to solve them are measured. We suggest an alternative to capital-weighted benchmarks which could provide a reality check on whether objectives are achievable.
18 May 2015
We are all faced with real-world investment problems. These might be the need to achieve adequate savings for retirement, to generate income to cover living costs, to meet the pension promises made to employees, or simply to maintain purchasing power over time. For many years, however, there has been a fundamental disconnection between these problems and the benchmark related portfolios which have been built to solve them. The use of market indices as de facto proxies for the intended risk exposures has allowed segmentation into convenient building blocks and easier portfolio monitoring, but has also led to differences between asset owners and their investment managers in how success is defined.
By using real-world outcomes as the explicit target results for portfolios, investors can dispense with these market related proxies and better align the success measures of their appointed managers with their own. Portfolios are judged on the delivery of the outcome, rather than compared with an abstract market measure (Figure 1).
Figure 1: What’s the problem you’re trying to solve?
Source: Schroders, for illustration only.
These five target outcomes can be distilled into more specific objectives. This article outlines a method to ensure these objectives are realistic and achievable. But such targets do not exist in isolation. As well as primary and secondary objectives, investors also have tolerance levels and investment restrictions to consider – it is the combination and relative importance of these elements that define the portfolio’s shape.
The likelihood of the successful achievement of target outcomes depends on:
– the reasonableness and consistency of primary and secondary objectives
– the extent of constraints imposed on the manager(s)
– the market environment experienced over the investor’s time horizon, including startingvaluations, and
– the manager’s ability to control outcomes through active management decisions.
Creating an outcome-oriented framework
As the basis for our analysis, we created an unbiased range of permutations of five asset classes – US equities, global equities, US Treasury bonds, commodities and cash. Rather than being random, these asset allocations attempt to replicate the full universe of possible portfolios. By populating them with actual market data, we can then define ranges of achievable outcomes, such as returns, volatility, drawdowns, income-generation or capital preservation. This demonstrates how outcomes change with asset class opportunities and over time, allowing us to identify realistic parameters for outcome-oriented portfolios.
Such a framework can be used to demonstrate how investors’ objectives and theirconstraints are inherently linked by showing, for example, the returns achievable from portfolios within certain risk limits or with restricted capital allocations. This framework can also be used as a monitoring tool for outcome-oriented portfolios. By combining information about the medium-term market environment with the actual long-term objectives, an intelligent assessment can be made of the portfolio’s performance.
The remainder of this article is a worked example of a risk-controlled growth portfolio, demonstrating the setting of realistic parameters and the use of our framework to monitor the outcomes. The main growth objective here is a typical specified portfolio return, often in absolute terms or in excess of a cash or an inflation measure. The secondary objective is the “risk-controlled” part. Here again, definitions can vary, with risk being seen variously in terms of loss tolerance, return variability/smoothness or in measures like value at risk. Figure 2 plots the range of return outcomes from our simulated portfolios over time. We also show a few real return target levels.
Figure 2: Real returns over five-year periods are often impossible to achieve
1001 simulated portfolios for each five-year period. Source: Bloomberg, Thomson Reuters Datastream and Schroders. Indices
used are the S&P 500 TR, US 10 year Treasuries, MSCI World, US 1 week LIBOR and DJ AIG Commodity.
Important Information: This communication is marketing material. The views and opinions contained herein are those of the author(s) on this page, and may not necessarily represent views expressed or reflected in other Schroders communications, strategies or funds. This material is intended to be for information purposes only and is not intended as promotional material in any respect. The material is not intended as an offer or solicitation for the purchase or sale of any financial instrument. It is not intended to provide and should not be relied on for accounting, legal or tax advice, or investment recommendations. Reliance should not be placed on the views and information in this document when taking individual investment and/or strategic decisions. Past performance is not a reliable indicator of future results. The value of an investment can go down as well as up and is not guaranteed. All investments involve risks including the risk of possible loss of principal. Information herein is believed to be reliable but Schroders does not warrant its completeness or accuracy. Some information quoted was obtained from external sources we consider to be reliable. No responsibility can be accepted for errors of fact obtained from third parties, and this data may change with market conditions. This does not exclude any duty or liability that Schroders has to its customers under any regulatory system. Regions/ sectors shown for illustrative purposes only and should not be viewed as a recommendation to buy/sell. The opinions in this material include some forecasted views. We believe we are basing our expectations and beliefs on reasonable assumptions within the bounds of what we currently know. However, there is no guarantee than any forecasts or opinions will be realised. These views and opinions may change. To the extent that you are in North America, this content is issued by Schroder Investment Management North America Inc., an indirect wholly owned subsidiary of Schroders plc and SEC registered adviser providing asset management products and services to clients in the US and Canada. For all other users, this content is issued by Schroder Investment Management Limited, 31 Gresham Street, London, EC2V 7QA. Registered No. 1893220 England. Authorised and regulated by the Financial Conduct Authority.