Investing in the future: Japan's focus on sustainability
Japanese companies are increasingly thinking long term in order to thrive and grow in the future.
21 June 2016
Schroders is proud to be one of a very small group of UK companies with a corporate history stretching back more than 200 years. Astonishingly, Japan is home to as many as 3,146 companies which were founded more than 200 years ago; some of which can be traced back more than 1,000 years.
Of course most of these are small, family-run and operate in niche areas, such as hotels and restaurants. Nevertheless, we can consider whether this Japanese aptitude for corporate longevity can tell us anything about the sustainability of Japanese business models in the future, and their ability to reward shareholders over time.
Sustainability, in an investment sense, can have a variety of meanings but in recent years investors’ approach to sustainability has coalesced around the principle of Environmental, Social and Governance (ESG) factors. Companies’ attitudes to the stakeholders represented under these headings - employees, regulators, shareholders and the environment - are now broadly viewed as indicators of future sustainability.
Among these factors, Japanese companies typically have strong social characteristics as the principles of lifetime employment and community support have always been part of corporate ethos, long before anyone ever thought of attaching an ESG label.
Conversely, Japan is regarded as a significant laggard in governance issues compared to other developed markets globally. In recent years the specific examples of Olympus and Toshiba have suggested corporate cultures which wrongly targeted “survival at all costs”, leading management to fraudulently disguise loss-making activities in order to preserve the status quo. These individual instances highlight the need for better governance at the board level but this in itself will be insufficient without fundamental changes in behaviour, both within companies and towards outside shareholders.
While the current management and governance structures in Japan have evolved over centuries to be aligned with local culture, from a global perspective the system can often appear to lack dynamism and effectively restrict any real challenge to management decisions.
At the same time, advances in technology and information flows, also mean that successful business models can now become obsolete much faster. An established company’s market position can be rapidly undercut by new entrants with a radically different business model or the value of a brand can be permanently impaired by a scandal.
As a result, more than ever before, companies need to innovate to survive and to embrace transparency. In this sense, it may now be dangerous for management thinking to be influenced by the same social factors that have enabled companies to endure for centuries. Investors now need to build into their decisions an analysis of the factors which allow sustainable business models not only to survive, but also to grow over time.
Although progress had been relatively slow, it is already possible to find individual examples of good governance behaviours in Japan. For example, Ryohin Keikaku, the operator of the “Muji” brand and one of fastest growing speciality retailers around the world, already has one third of their board comprised of external directors while the separately constituted Nomination & Remuneration committees are both chaired by independent directors. We should expect such cases to attract increasing attention going forward and to be used as examples of “best practice” for other companies.
Clear communication and engagement
Central to a broader development of this theme is a need for companies to explain their position to investors. This in turn requires a legal and regulatory framework which makes clear the rights and responsibilities both of companies and investors. Surprisingly for such a developed country, Japan has muddled through without such a framework, which has arguably prevented the stockmarket from truly fulfilling its role as an efficient mechanism for capital allocation.
So, in terms of changing behaviours, the Governance code & Stewardship code introduced by the current government are significant steps in the right direction and these will help to establish the principle of engagement between investors and companies. This is particularly important in Japan where some instances of over-aggressive activism have tended to make companies’ managements wary of any form of investor engagement. Now, however, there are good reasons to be optimistic that real progress is underway in this area.
This engagement ultimately leads to a much better dialogue between companies and investors in terms of the uses of capital and the returns which can flow from it. This is also closely tied to principles of sustainability as academic studies consistently show that companies with higher ESG scores have better operational performance and benefit from a lower cost of capital.
In Japan this latter distinction may seem less relevant as interest rates have been so close to zero for so long that virtually any corporate capital expenditure decision looks like a good idea. But investors must not be complacent on this issue and it is still important not to confuse short-term conditions with the structural issues.
Establishing a more rigorous framework for governance also allows investors to place more faith in quantitative scoring of particular factors, such as the number of independent directors. While such quantitative measures are important, there are also vital qualitative judgements to be made, for example, about whether these external directors are truly independent, whether they understand their fiduciary duty as directors and whether the company provides adequate training to enable them to fulfil this role.
These specific issues, as well as a broader assessment of the underlying changes in behaviour within companies, will form an increasingly large proportion of Japanese research going forward and this can’t be fully replicated by using only third party data or quantitative approaches. While improved governance is unquestionably a positive for the stockmarket in aggregate, by enabling clearer analysis of differentials between companies, it also argues in favour of active management and ongoing engagement in order to fully reflect these differences in client portfolios.
Investing in sustainability therefore requires long term thinking in order to identify companies with sustainable business models which are capable not just of surviving, but thriving and growing into the future. The recent volatility in Japan’s currency and stockmarket makes it particularly important for investors to maintain a focus on these positive longer-term stories.
Ongoing developments in Japan are helping to ensure that investors with such a long-term approach will ultimately be rewarded. Identifying these opportunities at the company level requires not only an awareness of measurable factors, but also an increased research effort and a consistent application of qualitative analysis of corporate behaviour.
- Nathan Gibbs
Important Information: The views and opinions contained herein are those of Schroders’ Investment team, and may not necessarily represent views expressed or reflected in other Schroders communications, strategies or funds. This material is intended to be for information purposes only and is not intended as promotional material in any respect. The material is not intended as an offer or solicitation for the purchase or sale of any financial instrument. It is not intended to provide and should not be relied on for accounting, legal or tax advice, or investment recommendations. Reliance should not be placed on the views and information in this document when taking individual investment and/or strategic decisions. Past performance is not a reliable indicator of future results. The value of an investment can go down as well as up and is not guaranteed. All investments involve risks including the risk of possible loss of principal. Information herein is believed to be reliable but Schroders does not warrant its completeness or accuracy. Some information quoted was obtained from external sources we consider to be reliable. No responsibility can be accepted for errors of fact obtained from third parties, and this data may change with market conditions. This does not exclude any duty or liability that Schroders has to its customers under any regulatory system. Regions/ sectors shown for illustrative purposes only and should not be viewed as a recommendation to buy/sell. The opinions in this material include some forecasted views. We believe we are basing our expectations and beliefs on reasonable assumptions within the bounds of what we currently know. However, there is no guarantee than any forecasts or opinions will be realised. These views and opinions may change. UK: Schroder Investment Management Limited, 31 Gresham Street, London, EC2V 7QA, is authorised and regulated by the Financial Conduct Authority. For your security, communications may be taped or monitored. Further information about Schroders can be found at www.schroders.com US: Schroder Investment Management North America Inc. is an indirect wholly owned subsidiary of Schroders plc, a SEC registered investment adviser and is registered in Canada in the capacity of Portfolio Manager with the Securities Commission in Alberta, British Columbia, Manitoba, Nova Scotia, Ontario, Quebec and Saskatchewan providing asset management products and services to clients in Canada. 875 Third Avenue, New York, NY, 10022, (212) 641-3800. www.schroders.com/us