Life after QE - what's next for markets?

At the recent Schroders Investment Conference in Budapest, a panel of Schroders’ fund managers discussed the intended and unintended consequences of quantitative easing. The panel was chaired by the Executive Editor of The Economist, Daniel Franklin.

13 October 2015

Gareth Isaac

Gareth Isaac

Martin Skanberg

Martin Skanberg

Fund Manager, European Equities

Patrick Vogel

Patrick Vogel

Head of European Credit

Investors are now well-acquainted with quantitative easing (QE), but the concept was little-known prior to 2007.

In the US and UK it has already come and gone, but it remains a firm fixture elsewhere. But has QE worked as intended, and will we ever again see a world without it?

A very big experiment

Although QE has arguably raised economic activity a little, the jury is still out on its other effects.

Before QE began in the US, critics of the policy predicted that it would lead to...

  • High inflation
  • A collapsing dollar
  • Surging commodity prices

...none of which have happened.

Senior Fixed Income Fund Manager, Gareth Isaac, explains that the consequences of QE could never have been fully understood beforehand.

“It was an experiment,” Isaac says. “All this money has been pumped into the economy, but the velocity of money hasn't risen.

"If this is because of the scars from the recession, it will be difficult to withdraw QE, and there is the argument that it will never be paid back.

"Central banks wanted higher inflation to help pay back the asset purchases, as inflation erodes the real value of cash, but this hasn't materialised.”

Have we created a monster?

Head of European Credit, Patrick Vogel, believes that QE may have had other unintended consequences.

Vogel is concerned that the flood of money pumped into economies by major central banks has inflated asset prices in some areas of financial markets and that politicians have failed to turn the QE lifeline to turn into real, sustainable growth.

“As a credit manager I need to look more at the downside than the upside,” says Vogel.

“I'm scared we have created bubbles. The real economy is not generating real opportunities, which is why the housing market is rising. Equity markets have risen to high multiples, whilst unviable ‘zombie’ businesses are not defaulting.

“We are not taking the next steps to lead to structural reforms. QE was intended to bridge the short-term crisis, and then the baton should have been passed to the politicians to implement structural reforms.

"Only if we get reforms going will we achieve sustainable growth and balanced markets. QE is distorting the markets, and has been for more than five years.”

Is volatility here to stay?

Indeed, far from withdrawing QE, some market commentators have suggested that additional rounds of asset purchases may be required, given deteriorating emerging market stability and elevated market volatility.

European equity fund manager, Martin Skanberg, believes that it will be difficult to assess what the next stage will be for QE until we have more clarity on global economic stability.

“Everything is correlated now so it's difficult to disentangle micro trends and add value. It's a frustrating time. Until we see the implications of a stronger dollar, we won't see things settle down.”

Vogel agrees, and while he believes that current volatility is not related to the end of QE, he warns that investors should expect things to get worse before they get better.

“We are at the end of a credit cycle and are seeing the normal higher volatility that this brings,’ he said.

“If credit is withdrawn from the economy, the economy slows down. There is little left that the central banks can do to prevent this, as they have limited firepower. The reality is that we will have to face a slowdown. The cycle is simply moving on.”

For related content:

Chinese government government stimulus to boost sentiment but not growth

March 2016 eyed as Fed aborts lift-off

Neurofinance: Inside the investor's brain

Consumers to drive growth

Investors, however, need not despair. Skanberg and Isaac expect the consumer to continue to support growth in the medium term, even if credit availability starts to wane.

“Profit margins are at an all time high in the US, and while these margins may come under pressure, consumer spend is rising,” Skanberg said. “In Europe, we haven't had earnings problems, and the low oil price is a boon too.”

Isaac agrees that the cooling of credit markets will have a negative impact, but also expects that rising household incomes could offset the slowdown.

“Wages are beginning to rise, while inflation is very low. That will drive consumption going forward,” Isaac said.

So, what’s next?

Consumers were initially hit hard by the crisis, but this is beginning to change.

The lack of material inflation, initially a concern, is now feeding through into real wage growth.

Cheap energy is also helping the consumer drive expansion. How sustainable this is, is down to political reform.

In reality, it appears we are a long way from a world without QE.

Although asset purchases have stopped in the US and the UK, they continue apace in Japan and Europe, and are unlikely to stop any time soon.

For now, a strong consumer is supporting ongoing growth, but if QE is ever to be fully withdrawn, we first need lasting structural change.


  • Global
  • Gareth Isaac
  • Martin Skanberg
  • Global Economy
  • Quantitative Easing
  • Patrick Vogel

Important Information: The views and opinions contained herein are those of Schroders’ Investment team, and may not necessarily represent views expressed or reflected in other Schroders communications, strategies or funds. This material is intended to be for information purposes only and is not intended as promotional material in any respect. The material is not intended as an offer or solicitation for the purchase or sale of any financial instrument. It is not intended to provide and should not be relied on for accounting, legal or tax advice, or investment recommendations. Reliance should not be placed on the views and information in this document when taking individual investment and/or strategic decisions. Past performance is not a reliable indicator of future results. The value of an investment can go down as well as up and is not guaranteed. All investments involve risks including the risk of possible loss of principal. Information herein is believed to be reliable but Schroders does not warrant its completeness or accuracy. Some information quoted was obtained from external sources we consider to be reliable. No responsibility can be accepted for errors of fact obtained from third parties, and this data may change with market conditions. This does not exclude any duty or liability that Schroders has to its customers under any regulatory system. Regions/ sectors shown for illustrative purposes only and should not be viewed as a recommendation to buy/sell. The opinions in this material include some forecasted views. We believe we are basing our expectations and beliefs on reasonable assumptions within the bounds of what we currently know. However, there is no guarantee than any forecasts or opinions will be realised. These views and opinions may change.  UK: Schroder Investment Management Limited, 31 Gresham Street, London, EC2V 7QA, is authorised and regulated by the Financial Conduct Authority. For your security, communications may be taped or monitored. Further information about Schroders can be found at US: Schroder Investment Management North America Inc. is an indirect wholly owned subsidiary of Schroders plc, a SEC registered investment adviser and is registered in Canada in the capacity of Portfolio Manager with the Securities Commission in Alberta, British Columbia, Manitoba, Nova Scotia, Ontario, Quebec and Saskatchewan providing asset management products and services to clients in Canada. 875 Third Avenue, New York, NY, 10022, (212) 641-3800.