Human frailty – Computers are only ever as reliable as the people who programme them


Kevin Murphy

Kevin Murphy

Fund Manager, Equity Value

“That’s amazing,” said a client. “Why doesn’t everyone invest that way?” Much as it pains The Value Perspective to admit it, the client was not enthusing about value investing but the potential of ‘quantitative’ funds, which rely on sophisticated technology and computer algorithms to analyse data and then buy and sell stocks according to set market strategies – all in the blink of an eye.

While we would agree these ‘quants’ funds can do some amazing things, However, investors should never lose sight of the fact they are only as good as their underlying programmes and systems – and, crucially, the people who type in those programmes and manage those systems. Some do this very well but others, as a number of high-profile cases have dramatically illustrated over the years, do not.

Take the recent example of Everbright securities in China, the stellar record of whose trading system was somewhat tarnished on the morning of 16 August – all in the blink of an eye. In just a couple of seconds, the system managed to generate 26, 082 ‘buy’ orders, snapping up every single stock that was for sale on the shanghai composite index at the time and pushing up the whole stockmarket by 5.62%.

According to the China Securities Regulatory Commission, this was “an extreme case without any precedent” since the Chinese stockmarket was established and the body is still looking into the matter. At present it appears a number of layers of examination and risk control all failed at the same time and the system was also missing a particular fail-safe component.

No human error as such has been identified although the two seconds of computer-generated chaos was brought to a close by a very human action. When traders realised something was amiss and there was no other way to stop the ‘buy’ orders being generated, they pulled out the internet and power cables – a very low-tech solution to a very high-tech problem.

Living as we do in an age of extraordinary digital innovation, people tend to think of computers as all-knowing and rational, but the truth is they are only as all-knowing and rational as the all-too-human human beings who type in the data, monitor the systems and so on. Unlike humans, computers always do exactly as they are told. That can indeed prove amazing – though not universally in a good way.

Whether they work with active or quants-based strategies, all professional investors have emotions and they can make mistakes – and, just as a value-driven or indeed any other equity investment style relies on the skill and judgement of the manager in charge, a quants fund is reliant on those programming the computers. It follows that, just as investors need to ensure they trust any active fund managers they use, they need to ensure they trust the people behind a quants process as much as the process itself.


Kevin Murphy

Kevin Murphy

Fund Manager, Equity Value

I joined Schroders in 2000 as an equity analyst with a focus on construction and building materials.  In 2006, Nick Kirrage and I took over management of a fund that seeks to identify and exploit deeply out of favour investment opportunities. In 2010, Nick and I also took over management of the team's flagship UK value fund seeking to offer income and capital growth.

Important Information:

The views and opinions displayed are those of Ian Kelly, Nick Kirrage, Andrew Lyddon, Kevin Murphy, Andrew Williams, Andrew Evans and Simon Adler, members of the Schroder Global Value Equity Team (the Value Perspective Team), and other independent commentators where stated. They do not necessarily represent views expressed or reflected in other Schroders' communications, strategies or funds. The Team has expressed its own views and opinions on this website and these may change.

This article is intended to be for information purposes only and it is not intended as promotional material in any respect. Reliance should not be placed on the views and information on the website when taking individual investment and/or strategic decisions. Nothing in this article should be construed as advice. The sectors/securities shown above are for illustrative purposes only and are not to be considered a recommendation to buy/sell.

Past performance is not a guide to future performance and may not be repeated. The value of investments and the income from them may go down as well as up and investors may not get back the amounts originally invested.