Blog

Peak District - Investors should not dismiss the whole US market for one broad, if high, number

12/08/2013

Kevin Murphy

Kevin Murphy

Fund Manager, Equity Value

One argument we have increasingly observed put forward as a reason not to own equities is company margins in the US have reached peak levels but is that actually the case? After all, using one number to cover the whole US market is a fairly broad-brush approach so, if we dug a little deeper, might we find a different story? The following chart would certainly suggest so.


The forecasts included in this presentation should not be relied upon, are not guaranteed and are provided only as at the date of issue. Our forecasts are based on our own assumptions which may change. We accept no responsibility for any errors of fact or opinion and assume no obligation to provide you with any changes to our assumptions or forecasts. Forecasts and assumptions may be affected by external economic or other factors.

Compiled by analysts at Morgan Stanley, it breaks the largest 1,500 US companies down by market capitalisation – into ‘mega’, large, medium and small-cap stocks. While it is impossible to deny that the mega-cap stocks are trading at peak net margins – they have been increasing in an almost straight line since the early 1990s – that is by no means the case at the other end of the capitalisation spectrum.

Smaller businesses are far more exposed to the ups and downs of economic cycles and so, when the credit crisis hit, the net margins of small and medium-sized companies fell far further than their large and mega-cap counterparts. Granted, they have since recovered to trade near the top of the current range but they could hardly be described as standing at a secular high.

There are also sector-based reasons for this disparity, with industrial firms that have outsourced parts of their operations to china or elsewhere seeing margins go through the roof. Once again, mega-caps such as general electric and tyco are in a far better position to outsource abroad than, say, mom & pop’s widgets. Strip out industrials from the picture, furthermore, and margins again look more reasonable.

In articles such as The nature of things and Dizzy heights, we have argued that, while the US market is historically expensive, pockets of value do exist for investors prepared to be more targeted in their approach. A similar emphasis on the importance of being selective underpins this warning not to dismiss the whole US market on the basis of one broad number reaching a high level.

Author

Kevin Murphy

Kevin Murphy

Fund Manager, Equity Value

I joined Schroders in 2000 as an equity analyst with a focus on construction and building materials.  In 2006, Nick Kirrage and I took over management of a fund that seeks to identify and exploit deeply out of favour investment opportunities. In 2010, Nick and I also took over management of the team's flagship UK value fund seeking to offer income and capital growth.

Important Information:

The views and opinions displayed are those of Ian Kelly, Nick Kirrage, Andrew Lyddon, Kevin Murphy, Andrew Williams, Andrew Evans and Simon Adler, members of the Schroder Global Value Equity Team (the Value Perspective Team), and other independent commentators where stated. They do not necessarily represent views expressed or reflected in other Schroders' communications, strategies or funds. The Team has expressed its own views and opinions on this website and these may change.

This article is intended to be for information purposes only and it is not intended as promotional material in any respect. Reliance should not be placed on the views and information on the website when taking individual investment and/or strategic decisions. Nothing in this article should be construed as advice. The sectors/securities shown above are for illustrative purposes only and are not to be considered a recommendation to buy/sell.

Past performance is not a guide to future performance and may not be repeated. The value of investments and the income from them may go down as well as up and investors may not get back the amounts originally invested.