Blog

Slow burn - Bad decisions taken in boom times can take a surprisingly long time to unwind

24/07/2014

Andrew Lyddon

Andrew Lyddon

Fund Manager, Equity Value

One of the things that most caught The Value Perspective’s  eye about the record $9bn (£5.25bn) settlement BNP Paribas has agreed with US  prosecutors in relation to allegations of sanctions violations was not the huge  price-tag nor even that it all but cancels out all of 2013’s profits –  effectively meaning the staff of an international bank spent the whole of last  year working for the US Treasury.

No, it is the way this sorry tale is another illustration of  how decisions and actions that apparently began to be taken a decade ago are  still coming to light and working their way through the judicial process. For  it is a feature of booms in general – and financial and credit-based booms in  particular – that they can take a very long time to unwind completely.

This is true at both a national level – years after the boom in Japan, for instances, the country is still hugely leveraged and exposed to  comparatively small moves in interest rates – and at a corporate one. Examples here are legion but it is worth pointing out Barclays only recently faced up to  the need to ‘ring-fence’ certain non-performing assets in a ‘bad bank’ –  something Lloyds and RBS had done years previously.

From a value perspective, there will be times when share  prices do not discount this sort of historical baggage and times when they do.  Nevertheless, even in those latter times, investors tempted to buy into stocks  that have been swept along by very large bubbles need to do so with their eyes  open. While these things are necessarily difficult to predict, some recognition  of the fact that the fall-out of these booms can be large and take a long time  to unwind should be factored into the price one is willing to pay.

 

Author

Andrew Lyddon

Andrew Lyddon

Fund Manager, Equity Value

I joined Schroders as a graduate in 2005 and have spent most of my time in the business as part of the UK equities team. Between 2006 and 2010 I was a research analyst responsible for producing investment research on companies in the UK construction, business services and telecoms sectors. In mid 2010 I joined Kevin Murphy and Nick Kirrage on the UK value team.

Important Information:

The views and opinions displayed are those of Ian Kelly, Nick Kirrage, Andrew Lyddon, Kevin Murphy, Andrew Williams, Andrew Evans and Simon Adler, members of the Schroder Global Value Equity Team (the Value Perspective Team), and other independent commentators where stated. They do not necessarily represent views expressed or reflected in other Schroders' communications, strategies or funds. The Team has expressed its own views and opinions on this website and these may change.

This article is intended to be for information purposes only and it is not intended as promotional material in any respect. Reliance should not be placed on the views and information on the website when taking individual investment and/or strategic decisions. Nothing in this article should be construed as advice. The sectors/securities shown above are for illustrative purposes only and are not to be considered a recommendation to buy/sell.

Past performance is not a guide to future performance and may not be repeated. The value of investments and the income from them may go down as well as up and investors may not get back the amounts originally invested.