2016 and before

What does the oil price fall mean for income investors?

As banks begin to signal the threat to their balance sheets of bad loans to the energy sector, we look at whether the fall in the oil price could also place dividends from the “big six” oil firms at risk.


JPMorgan has announced that its energy sector losses, mainly the result of bad loans, could cost the bank as much as $2.8 billion.

It is a clear sign of the effect the sustained plunge in the price of oil is having on energy firms’ balance sheets, but it is unlikely super major oil firms will resort to cutting dividends, at least in the short-term.

Why are oil majors dodging dividend cuts?

A dividend cut will be the last resort for oil super majors looking to protect their balance sheets.

Super majors, or the “big six”, have historically chosen to slash operating costs and capital expenditure (CAPEX) rather than dump their dividends:

Oil firms’ commitment to maintaining and even growing their dividends appears undimmed.

  • After reporting its first quarterly loss since 2002 and deep cuts across its operations, Chevron, the US’s second-largest oil firm announced that the company’s number one financial priority was “to maintain and grow the dividend”.
  • BP reiterated its commitment to its dividend policy in its most recent profit slump.

Of the super six oil majors, Italy’s Eni is the only one so far to cut its dividend during the recent oil slump, and that was almost a year ago.

But while oil prices remain depressed and borrowing costs ultra-low most major energy companies appear to prefer to borrow money, in part to cover their dividend, rather than break their dividend promise.

  • US oil and gas production companies’ debt more than doubled between the end of 2010 and June 2015, according to data released to the Financial Times by Factset.

Can oil companies afford to keep paying dividends?

In the short-term it appears they can. Most major energy companies, with the exception of Eni, have maintained their dividend policies despite the decline in the oil price and cashflows, which has been ongoing for the best part of the last five years.

While the year ahead is expected to be painful for the oil industry the over supply issue currently dogging the sector is expected to be addressed.

Analysts estimate that the oil price will make a recovery, potentially easing the burden on energy firms:

  • A recent Reuters poll revealed the average 2016 price for benchmark North Sea Brent crude was forecast at $52.52 a barrel.
  • The Financial Times ran an article which suggested that because of technical factors we might be nearing “peak bear” for oil.

Why are energy company dividends so important?

In a low income world – most developed economies’ interest rates are at or near zero and global equities yield 2.8%1 – it is easy to understand why oil majors’ dividends are in so much demand:

Company                   Dividend Yield2
Eni SpA                              8.2%
Royal Dutch Shell B           8.0%
BP                                      7.9%
Total SA                             6.0%
Chevron                             5.0%
ExxonMobil                        3.6%

  • The energy sector makes up a large proportion of the entire market’s yield. In the UK, for instance, Royal Dutch Shell and BP together provide close to one-fifth of all FTSE 100 dividends.
  • Income investment managers rely on the sector’s dividends to meet legal requirements to deliver yield wider than the market offers.

What are the risks?

Oil firms’ commitment to paying dividends comes with the caveat that the oil price does indeed recover.

A continued drought will place further pressure on energy companies’ ability to cover their dividends through earnings from day-to-day operations.

As illustrated in our September 2015 infographic, Royal Dutch Shell and BP are among the biggest firms in the UK which have poor dividend cover3.

At the moment that is not a problem, because they can continue to borrow money.

However, according to financial information services firm Markit, a price consistently below $30 a barrel could be the point at which banks’ credit lines to energy firms start to get choked off.

Credit ratings agencies have already fired a warning shot across oil majors’ bows:

In response one of the oil majors, Repsol, has cut its dividend to protect its investment grade rating.

A basic analysis of the “big six’s” balance sheets between 2008 and 2014 shows a worrying trend of rising dividend payout ratios4 and falling free-cash-flow yields5.

What does it mean for investors?

The short-term noise around dividend cuts won’t stop, but income from oil majors looks safe, for now.

Given the pressure on earnings and prospective yield, it is likely investors will focus on five main themes when looking at investing in the oil sector:

  • Balance sheet strength
  • Company debt levels
  • Free-cash-flow-yield
  • Revenue exposure geographically
  • Valuations

1. MSCI World Equity Index yield as at 25/02/2016.

2. ThomsonReuters Datastream as at 25/02/2016

3. Dividend cover: The ratio of a company's net profits to the total sum allotted in dividends to ordinary shareholders.

4. Dividend Payout Ratio: The fraction of net income paid out to shareholders in dividends.

5. Free Cash Flow Yield: An indicator that compares free cash flow and market cap. It is a representation of the income (free cash flow) created by an investment.

Important Information: The views and opinions contained herein are those of Schroders Investment Communications Team, and may not necessarily represent views expressed or reflected in other Schroders communications, strategies or funds. Past performance is not a guide to future performance and may not be repeated. The value of investments and the income from them may go down as well as up and investors may not get back the amounts originally invested. The forecasts included should not be relied upon, are not guaranteed and are provided only as at the date of issue. Our forecasts are based on our own assumptions which may change. We accept no responsibility for any errors of fact or opinion and assume no obligation to provide you with any changes to our assumptions or forecasts. Forecasts and assumptions may be affected by external economic or other factors. Company names are mentioned for illustrative purposes only and should not be viewed as a recommendation to buy or sell securities issued by those companies. This document is intended to be for information purposes only and it is not intended as promotional material in any respect. The material is not intended as an offer or solicitation for the purchase or sale of any financial instrument. The material is not intended to provide, and should not be relied on for, accounting, legal or tax advice, or investment recommendations. Information herein is believed to be reliable but Schroder Investment Management Ltd (Schroders) does not warrant its completeness or accuracy. No responsibility can be accepted for errors of fact or opinion. This does not exclude or restrict any duty or liability that Schroders has to its customers under the Financial Services and Markets Act 2000 (as amended from time to time) or any other regulatory system. Issued by Schroder Unit Trusts Limited, 31 Gresham Street, London, EC2V 7QA. Registered Number 4191730 England. Authorised and regulated by the Financial Conduct Authority. For your security, communications may be taped or monitored.


Kontaktieren Sie Schroders Wealth Management

Um Ihre Anforderungen an die Vermögensverwaltung zu besprechen oder mehr über unsere Dienstleistung zu erfahren, wenden Sie sich bitte an:

Alexander Prinz von Hessen

Alexander Prinz von Hessen

Geschäftsführender Direktor alexander.hessen@schroders.com