The coronavirus crisis has seen some high profile companies step up to offer their support. We consider what this means for sustainable investing, and the possibility of a new social contract. By Katherine Davidson, Portfolio Manager, Global & International Equities and Scott MacLennan, Fund Manager/Research Analyst, European Equities
Sustainable investing has grown exponentially in recent years. In the US, net flows into sustainable funds reached $20.6 billion in 2019, more than four times the previous annual record which was set in 2018. Even so, there has long been a nervousness – among clients and, if we’re honest, even portfolio managers – about how the space would behave in a downturn.
In terms of performance, we have long argued that sustainable companies should have lower declines due to lower incidence of controversies and occupational mishaps; greater loyalty from customers, employees and even shareholders; and often more conservative balance sheets.
There’s also a question of whether asset owners will continue to demand sustainable/ESG (environmental, social, governance) funds in a downturn, or whether ethical investing was a luxury that could only be afforded in an bull market.
The current crisis provides an unfortunate opportunity to test these hypotheses.
Thus far, the evidence seems encouraging. As much as we are sceptical of passive ESG funds, it is interesting to see that the MSCI ESG Leaders indices have outperformed their mainstream counterparts in most geographies, albeit modestly in most instances. The UK is the most striking example with the FTSE 100 ESG Leaders index returning -27.3% year-to-date compared to -33.7% for the FTSE 100 index (source: BofAML European Equity Strategy, Bloomberg, as at 24 March 2020). The MSCI ESG Leaders indices target companies that have the highest ESG rated performance in each sector of the parent index.
Research by BofAML also finds that the top 20% of ESG-ranked stocks outperformed the US market by over five percentage points during the recent sell-off (see the blue line on the chart below). Interestingly, this was not just down to a sector bias (ESG stocks are less likely to be in energy sector, and more likely to be consumer staples/healthcare), but persists on a sector-adjusted basis (see green line).
This is partly because ESG leaders have so far seen smaller earnings per share (EPS) cuts than ESG laggards. This is shown in the chart below which looks at cuts to earnings per share estimates for US companies.
ESG assets also appear to have been more resilient in terms of investment flows. The chart below shows how ESG exchange traded funds had lower outflows in the last month and are still net positive year-to-date compared to record outflows from equities overall.
Moreover, it seems to us that this crisis has actually increased the visibility and perceived importance of sustainable business practices. Amid terrifying headlines and unprecedented disruption to our day-to-day lives, we are all rethinking our personal values and priorities.
Treatment of stakeholders is headline news
Similarly, the role of business in wider society and treatment of stakeholders have become topics of daily conversation. As the Chairman of the World Economic Forum wrote in the Financial Times, “The Covid-19 crisis is a litmus test that shows who has been ‘swimming naked’ while endorsing stakeholder capitalism.”
Companies’ treatment of their customers, employees and suppliers is under greater scrutiny than ever before. Beyond government pressure to protect jobs, close attention is being paid to how companies treat their staff in these tumultuous times.
It is reasonable to expect that companies that attract positive recognition will see greater loyalty from their staff and be more able to attract new recruits after the crisis. Conversely, staff may leave employers that they felt abandoned them in the crisis (once they can afford to). Workers may be less inclined to trade off flexibility for security, and be looking for employers that offer good non-statutory benefits rather than just the highest salary.
And every employee is also a consumer, so we could also see market share shift to companies that are deemed to have ‘done their bit’ during the crisis. Companies that have good relationships and visibility in their supplier base will be more able to manage their working capital and minimise disruption to production.
More broadly, we have seen the public and private sector join forces to protect their communities, with governments relying on companies to enforce guidance on stockpiling, social distancing etc., and making use of private sector capabilities and assets to meet the population’s needs.
In return, governments and regulators are providing relief to the private sector, for example by subsidising wages or providing tax relief. We are seeing the emergence of a new ‘social contract’, which we hope could open a new phase in public-private relations after the fractious, anti-capitalist rhetoric of recent years.
JUST Capital has been tracking the response of the US’s top 100 employers to the crisis (see chart below): only 36% have paid sick leave and 28% have guaranteed continued pay for hourly workers. At the same time, only 6% have committed to executive pay cuts, and we have even seen companies awarding huge bonuses to executives while lobbying for state support. Laggards are increasingly being named and shamed in the press, and may not have access to government relief funds.
Our CEO has spoken out about the importance of the social contract, and we will be engaging with our holdings to ensure they are behaving appropriately. We also recognise that shareholders have to share the pain – in the form of falling share prices, dividend cuts, and equity raises. As long-term investors, we are committed to supporting companies where we believe growth and profits are sustainable beyond the crisis.
Below, we provide some good examples of companies taking care of their stakeholders and helping to tackle the crisis. These are noteworthy partly because they are not (yet) the norm.
What are companies doing to help tackle the crisis?
Mannat Chopra, Sustainability Analyst, European Equities and Scott MacLennan, Fund Manager, European Equities highlight examples in Europe
Emerging Markets – Jonathan Fletcher, Analyst, Emerging Market Equities
Global – Katherine Davidson, Portfolio Manager, Global & International Equities
The above is by no means an exhaustive list of companies that are doing their bit to support society through this crisis, but gives a flavour of how firms in different industries and geographies are responding. This current emergency throws a spotlight on these types of actions.
As investors, our job remains the same: we focus on identifying those companies that have the best potential for sustainable growth over the long term, underpinned by strong relationships with their stakeholders. We have long argued that ‘companies do not operate in a vacuum’ – never has this felt more true.
This material has been issued by Schroder Investment Management Australia Limited (ABN 22 000 443 274, AFSL 226473) (Schroders) for information purposes only. It is intended solely for professional investors and financial advisers and is not suitable for distribution to retail clients. The views and opinions contained herein are those of the authors as at the date of publication and are subject to change due to market and other conditions. Such views and opinions may not necessarily represent those expressed or reflected in other Schroders communications, strategies or funds. The information contained is general information only and does not take into account your objectives, financial situation or needs. Schroders does not give any warranty as to the accuracy, reliability or completeness of information which is contained in this material. Except insofar as liability under any statute cannot be excluded, Schroders and its directors, employees, consultants or any company in the Schroders Group do not accept any liability (whether arising in contract, in tort or negligence or otherwise) for any error or omission in this material or for any resulting loss or damage (whether direct, indirect, consequential or otherwise) suffered by the recipient of this material or any other person. This material is not intended to provide, and should not be relied on for, accounting, legal or tax advice. Any references to securities, sectors, regions and/or countries are for illustrative purposes only. You should note that past performance is not a reliable indicator of future performance. Schroders may record and monitor telephone calls for security, training and compliance purposes.