IN FOCUS6-8 min read

Regime shift: the return of “fiscal activism”

We expect governments to more actively tax and spend as they attempt to combat higher inflation. This is just one aspect of a new regime in policy and market behaviour that we anticipate in the years to come.

Picture of treasury building


Keith Wade
Chief Economist & Strategist

In our view, we are now entering an economic phase where inflation is higher and more volatile than it has been in the recent past.

Under this new regime, monetary policy (which is the responsibility of central banks and includes changing interest rates to manage inflation) will have to remain focused on controlling inflation, potentially leaving a void for fiscal (government tax and spend) policy to manage growth, or a lack thereof.

We have termed this “the return of fiscal activism” and it will have far-reaching economic implications, including risking serious conflict with central banks and the markets. As a consequence, increased fiscal activism may involve other more radical changes to the policy framework.

The return of “big government”

The pandemic experience has been a key factor in bringing about a shift towards fiscal activism. Governments around the world successfully supported household incomes through furlough schemes and direct transfers while organising the roll-out of mass vaccination programmes. The return of “big government” has led many to call for authorities to be more active in other areas and more willing to use public spending to solve other problems.

Monetary policy has become less effective

The desire for a more active fiscal approach also reflects increasing discontent with monetary policy. After years of driving growth, monetary changes seemed to lose their potency after the global financial crisis (GFC) – since the GFC, the world has witnessed some of the weakest growth ever, despite the lowest interest rates on record for many economies.  

However, we believe inflation will prove to be more difficult to control in the new regime and that interest rates will need to be higher over this decade than they have since the GFC. 

Consequently, the regime shift will mean that monetary policy will prioritise controlling inflation (the subject of part 1 of the series), potentially leaving a void for fiscal activism to manage growth. The balance between monetary and fiscal policy is set to shift away from a combination of loose money and tight fiscal, towards one of tight money and loose fiscal policy.

Potential conflicts

Replacing monetary policy with expansionary fiscal policy to drive growth is not straightforward. The combination of restrictive monetary policy and expansionary fiscal policy has been likened to driving a car with one foot on the accelerator and the other on the brake. The return of fiscal activism to generate stronger growth risks a conflict with central banks’ attempts to control inflation.

Ways governments can be more fiscally active

In the new regime, governments will be testing the limits of their ability to be more fiscally active. Many will simply accept the impact of additional spending on monetary policy and decide that greater public borrowing for political priorities is worth the pain of higher interest rates.

Others would be concerned about the increase in the size of the state and the burden of higher taxes on incentives to work and invest.

Another, less contentious, route would be to fully implement the OECD’s 15% minimum tax rate on corporations designed to capture the evasion of tax by many multi-nationals, particularly large tech companies.

Clearly there are political choices to be made and as well as higher taxes or spending cuts, there would be renewed interest in questioning the limits of the state and privatisation. If none of these are acceptable, the alternative is to be more radical and look to change the existing system.

Radical changes

This might mean altering central banks’ mandates to one which would tolerate greater inflation. For example, increasing the inflation target, or adopting a more explicit dual mandate of inflation and employment goals. The ultimate sanction would be to rescind central bank independence and for the authorities to take back control of monetary policy.

Of course, any of these measures would provoke a violent reaction from financial markets. Governments would also have to think hard about the consequences, particularly higher inflation.


We should expect economic policy to be more politically charged as fiscal policy means more decisions on spending and tax, creating winners and losers.

Interested to read more investment insights? Click here.

Important Information:

This document is issued by Schroder Investment Management Australia Limited (ABN 22 000 443 274, AFSL 226473) (Schroders). It is intended solely for wholesale clients (as defined under the Corporations Act 2001 (Cth)) and is not suitable for distribution to retail clients. This document does not contain and should not be taken as containing any financial product advice or financial product recommendations. This document does not take into consideration any recipient’s objectives, financial situation or needs. Before making any decision relating to a Schroders fund, you should obtain and read a copy of the product disclosure statement available at or other relevant disclosure document for that fund and consider the appropriateness of the fund to your objectives, financial situation and needs. You should also refer to the target market determination for the fund at All investments carry risk, and the repayment of capital and performance in any of the funds named in this document are not guaranteed by Schroders or any company in the Schroders Group. The material contained in this document is not intended to provide, and should not be relied on for accounting, legal or tax advice. Schroders does not give any warranty as to the accuracy, reliability or completeness of information which is contained in this document. To the maximum extent permitted by law, Schroders, every company in the Schroders plc group, and their respective directors, officers, employees, consultants and agents exclude all liability (however arising) for any direct or indirect loss or damage that may be suffered by the recipient or any other person in connection with this document. Opinions, estimates and projections contained in this document reflect the opinions of the authors as at the date of this document and are subject to change without notice. “Forward-looking” information, such as forecasts or projections, are not guarantees of any future performance and there is no assurance that any forecast or projection will be realised. Past performance is not a reliable indicator of future performance. All references to securities, sectors, regions and/or countries are made for illustrative purposes only and are not to be construed as recommendations to buy, sell or hold. Telephone calls and other electronic communications with Schroders representatives may be recorded.


Keith Wade
Chief Economist & Strategist


Regime shift
Fiscal activism
Fiscal policy
Monetary policy
Interest rates
Global economy
Our sales team is available to discuss with you any investment opportunities.
Follow us

This website is owned and operated by Schroder Investment Management Australia Limited (ABN 22 000 443 274, AFSL 226473).  Your access to this website is subject to the Terms of Use found by clicking the ‘Important Information’ link below.  By using this website, you agree to be subject to these Terms of Use.