IN FOCUS6-8 min read

Nuclear power: a viable option in an energy transition?

In this Q&A, we explore investment in nuclear power – its role in decarbonisation strategies, current capacity vs future targets, its environmental and economic credentials, safety and the problematic financing gap.

08-08-2023
Fossils_v_renewables

Authors

Samuel Thomas
Sustainable Investment Analyst

Government announcements of support for nuclear power investment raise the prospect that an industry that has trodden water for the last few decades could see a re-emergence.

With proposals from a China development for at least 150 new nuclear reactors in the next 15 years to a new UK government commitment to explore small modular reactors (SMRs), the outlook for nuclear power – and the industries and companies tied to it – may be brightening.

Here we tackle the key questions investors are asking about nuclear – why governments globally are now targeting nuclear growth and what role nuclear can play in decarbonisation plans - as interest in the theme develops.

How much support is there for new nuclear power – and how many new nuclear reactors are already being built or planned?

We are seeing growing support for nuclear, with political commitments over the coming decade including plans for hundreds of new reactors around the world. Five of the world’s largest economies – the US, India, the UK, Japan and China – have announced targets to substantially increase nuclear capacity. In Germany, the exception, opposition to nuclear has been softening.

US plans to increase nuclear capacity.India plans to increase nuclear capacityUK plans to increase nuclear capacity.Japan plans to increase nuclear capacity.China plans to increase nuclear capacity.

The pipeline for new reactors includes 58 under construction, 103 planned and 325 proposed, according to the World Nuclear Association reactor database figures. This equates to 65,899MWe of nuclear power that is currently under construction (as of July 2023), the highest the industry has seen since 2015.

What is the role of nuclear in strategies to reach net zero?

There are currently 439 nuclear reactors in operation globally, with an estimated 413GW of operating capacity in 2022, accounting for around 10% of global power production. Under the International Energy Agency’s (IEA) Net Zero Scenario, the nuclear industry would need to nearly double its capacity by 2050. With governments under pressure to articulate how they intend to meet the decarbonisation commitments they have made, it’s unsurprising that nuclear plans have returned to the energy agendas of many countries. Of course, more recent concerns over energy security are another factor driving a re-emerging interest in nuclear power.

Specifically, to reach its net zero emissions scenario, the IEA forecasts that nuclear capacity needs to reach 812GW by 2050. Under this scenario, average annual additions need to reach c25GW per year over the next three decades. To put this into perspective, net average annual capacity brought online over the past decade was just 6GW.

Historic nuclear capacity vs. required average to reach net zero.

How much investment would be needed to reach net zero targets?

Investment in nuclear needs to triple under the IEA’s Net Zero Scenario. Between 2016 and 2020, average annual global investment in nuclear power was $35 billion. To reach net zero, investment needs to scale up to more than $100 billion per year by the late 2020s and remain above $80 billion through to 2025.

How environmentally-friendly is nuclear power?

From a review of previous literature on the topic – life-cycle emissions analysis from the IPCC, UNECE, IEA and IAEA – it is clear that nuclear is one of the lowest emitting sources of power. Nuclear power emits just 10-15g/CO2 equivalent per kWh, which is competitive with both wind and solar and substantially better than coal and natural gas. Nuclear power is also the second largest source of low carbon energy after hydro power, more than wind and solar combined.

Over the past five decades it is estimated that nuclear power has cumulatively avoided 70Gt of CO2. To put that into perspective, total annual CO2 emissions in China reached 12.1Gt CO2 in 2022.

How economical is nuclear power?

When delivered successfully, nuclear energy can be cost competitive compared to other power sources. The levelized cost of electricity (LCOE), i.e. the average net present cost of electricity generation for a generator over its lifetime, for nuclear power is around $60 per MWh, which is lower than fossil fuel generation and competitive against other low-carbon technologies, according to analysis from the IEA.

However, it is important to caveat the IEA’s analysis with the fact that LCOEs for different power generation sources are influenced by a huge range of factors and will thus vary project to project. For nuclear in particular, recent LCOEs have been coming in higher than the IEA’s average. A good example of this is in the UK where the Hinkley Point C project has a Contract for Difference price of £92.50/MWh, clearly higher than the IEA’s average.

On reliability, nuclear has an average capacity factor – or the ratio of the actual energy generated over time compared to energy that could have been produced at continuous full power operation during the same period – of 90-95%, the highest of all energy sources.

Lastly, nuclear lifetime extensions are also a cost effective means of power generation. The International Atomic Energy Agency estimates that lifetime extensions generate one of the highest kWh returns per dollar of investment of all power generation sources.

How significant is the ability to mobilise finance as a barrier?

Safety and waste concerns aside, one of the largest barriers to new large-scale nuclear construction is the ability to mobilise investment.

While governments clearly believe nuclear has a role to play in the future energy mix and decarbonisation strategies, there remains a large funding gap between nuclear targets and the capital needed to achieve them.

New financing mechanisms will need to be explored that try to better balance the risk allocation between government and private capital. One such option is the regulated asset base (RAB) financing mechanism. Sizewell C (if it proceeds) would be the first nuclear power plant in the UK to be funded using a RAB model.

How safe is nuclear power?

Perhaps surprisingly, nuclear energy is one of the safest forms of energy generation. When analysing the death rates per unit of electricity produced, nuclear power is the second safest source of power generation. There have been an average of 0.03 deaths per terawatt-hour of electricity produced, which is substantially lower than for coal, oil & gas and wind generation.

Then on waste, due to the power density of nuclear fuel, very little material is required to produce large amounts of electricity. Consequently, the volume of nuclear waste produced is low and it is important to remember that nuclear regulators mandate operators to make provisions for the cost of managing nuclear waste, so these costs are internalised as operating costs for the plants as well.

What are the other key risks to nuclear power growth?

There are a number of hurdles that may prevent nuclear from reaching its potential such as the upfront capital costs and perceived safety concerns. Similarly, a prerequisite for any nuclear power re-emergence will be a backdrop of constructive and stable government policy and support, which itself relies on favourable public perception.

Subscribe to our Insights

Visit our preference center, where you can choose which Schroders Insights you would like to receive

The views and opinions contained herein are those of Schroders’ investment teams and/or Economics Group, and do not necessarily represent Schroder Investment Management North America Inc.’s house views. These views are subject to change. This information is intended to be for information purposes only and it is not intended as promotional material in any respect.

Authors

Samuel Thomas
Sustainable Investment Analyst

Topics

Regime shift
Net Zero
Climate Change
Environmental
ESG
Global
Decarbonisation
3D Reset
Sustainability
Follow us

Please consider a fund's investment objectives, risks, charges and expenses carefully before investing.

The website and the content included is intended for US-based financial intermediaries (and their non-US affiliates) on behalf of those of their clients who are both (a) not “US persons” as that term is defined in Rule 902 under the United States Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the “1933 Act”) and (b) “non-United States persons” as that terms is defined in Rule 4.7(a)(vi) under the Commodity Exchange Act of 1936, as amended. None of the funds described herein is registered as an “investment company” as that term is defined in the United States Investment Company Act of 1940, as amended, and shares of the funds described herein have not been and will not be registered under the 1933 Act or the securities laws of any of the states of the United States. The shares may not be offered, sold or delivered directly or indirectly in the United States or for the account or benefit of any “US person.”

The information contained in this website does not constitute an offer to purchase or sell, advertise, recommend, distribute or solicit a subscription for interests in investment products in any Latin American jurisdiction where such would be unauthorized. The information contained in this website is not intended for distribution to the public in general and must not be reproduced or distributed, entirely or partially to any individuals who are not allowed to receive it according to applicable legislation. The investment products and their distribution may not be registered in Latin America, and therefore may not meet certain requirements and procedures usually observed in public offerings of securities registered in the region, with which investors in the Latin America capital markets may be familiar. For this reason, the access of the investors to certain information regarding the investment products may be restricted. Financial intermediaries and Advisors must ensure the information provided in this website is appropriate and suitable to the receiver’s domicile and jurisdiction and according to the applicable legislation.

For illustrative purposes only and does not constitute a recommendation to invest in the above-mentioned security/sector/country.

Issued by Schroder Investment Management (Europe) S.A., 5 (“SIM Europe”), rue Höhenhof, L-1736 Senningerberg, Luxembourg. Registered No. B 37.799

Schroder Investment Management North America Inc. (“SIMNA”) is an SEC registered investment adviser, CRD Number 105820, providing asset management products and services to clients in the US and registered as a Portfolio Manager with the securities regulatory authorities in Canada.  Schroder Fund Advisors LLC (“SFA”) is a wholly-owned subsidiary of SIMNA Inc. and is registered as a limited purpose broker-dealer with FINRA and as an Exempt Market Dealer with the securities regulatory authorities in Canada.  SFA markets certain investment vehicles for which other Schroders entities are investment advisers.

Schroders Capital is the private markets investment division of Schroders plc.  Schroders Capital Management (US) Inc. (“Schroders Capital US”) is registered as an investment adviser with the US Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC).  It provides asset management products and services to clients in the United States and Canada.  For more information, visit www.schroderscapital.com

SIM (Europe), SIMNA, SFA and Schroders Capital are wholly owned subsidiaries of Schroders plc.