COP27: a first-hand account
COP27: a first-hand account
One particular thing that struck me was how different the challenges facing many emerging and frontier markets are compared to more developed economies when it comes to the climate crisis.
I met many delegates from across Africa – for example – over the three days and was reminded of the differences within such a vast continent, where views and priorities vary greatly from the north to south, from east to west.
For some, the priority was the opportunities in green hydrogen, for others it was about natural capital in the Congo Basin. Others told me they were focusing on the growth in renewables in Kenya and Southern Africa.
A common theme among these diverse delegates, however, was the “loss and damage” issue. That is, the fact that developed markets have not paid the $100 billion per-year promised by 2020 to finance climate initiatives in developing markets.
That the negative impacts of the biggest polluters in the world disproportionately affect developing economies, means this unfulfilled promise is felt all the more keenly.
I also heard from a range of private sector entrepreneurs from emerging markets, many of whom are losing hope that developed economies will come forward with substantial assistance.
They are increasingly of the view that they need to take action and be in charge of their own future.
After all, they are best-placed to know what local markets need. They are also conscious of the risk of carrying debts in US dollars, which has become all the more onerous as the dollar has strengthened significantly. In some cases there is also a resistance to relying on assistance from former colonial masters.
Among the various sessions I attended, I found those with indigenous people especially illuminating. Ensuring their inclusion has been one of the main challenges of the conference.
Indigenous land contains 80% of the worlds remaining biodiversity, so listening to the voices and protecting the rights of these peoples is critical to reaching climate and nature goals. Though they are present at COP, their designated “observer” status gives them little influence on climate policy discussions and I was among those who felt it to be an inadequate arrangement.
Development finance institutions also came into focus for many at COP27. The scale of the climate challenges faced are bigger than development aid budgets and development banks’ capital.
This means collaborations with corporates, asset owners and asset managers are the only way dollars can be multiplied for key climate initiatives to reach the scale required to have an impact.
Blended finance – effectively public-private partnerships – was much discussed; in particular in relation to innovative climate finance initiatives that don’t have a track-record, and present more of a venture-capital type of risk, or around new asset class concepts like natural capital.
Regulators have pushed for more disclosure of climate risks in investors’ portfolios and a number of methodologies are competing for best in class; for example, the Science-based Targets initiative (SBTi), Taskforce for Climate-related Financial Disclosures (TCFD), soon the Taskforce for Nature-related Financial Disclosures (TNFD), among others.
So there was much discussion on data availability, carbon measurement and reporting tools that can guide investors and make their life easier in terms of their impact on climate today and what it could look like tomorrow. The dream of everyone is to have one fairly low-maintenance tool across different strategies – mitigation, adaptation, and natural capital.
Finally, I found the human part of COP27 inspiring for the most part. At a time when virtual meetings still dominate my professional life, mixing in-person with former colleagues, practitioners, current and future investors, as well as delegates from around the world, was refreshing and reminded me of the value of face-to-face interaction.
The male bias was, however, notable. Perhaps unsurprisingly, the diversity challenges that the corporate and political worlds face are reflected at major conferences like this, with a remarkable number of panels and delegations comprised solely of men.
I look forward to a greater female presence at future COPs.
Learn more about Schroders’ approach to sustainability, visit one of our Sustainability pages:
- Our multi-asset investment views - November 2022
- Outlook 2023, China: will a loosening of zero-Covid provide a spark?
- China’s latest Covid crisis, war in Ukraine: observations for investors
- Economic and Strategy Viewpoint - Q4 2022
- Outlook 2023, US multi-sector fixed income: yields up risk down
- Outlook 2023, Sustainability: five trends to watch
This material has been issued by Schroder Investment Management Australia Limited (ABN 22 000 443 274, AFSL 226473) (Schroders) for information purposes only. It is intended solely for professional investors and financial advisers and is not suitable for distribution to retail clients. The views and opinions contained herein are those of the authors as at the date of publication and are subject to change due to market and other conditions. Such views and opinions may not necessarily represent those expressed or reflected in other Schroders communications, strategies or funds. The information contained is general information only and does not take into account your objectives, financial situation or needs. Schroders does not give any warranty as to the accuracy, reliability or completeness of information which is contained in this material. Except insofar as liability under any statute cannot be excluded, Schroders and its directors, employees, consultants or any company in the Schroders Group do not accept any liability (whether arising in contract, in tort or negligence or otherwise) for any error or omission in this material or for any resulting loss or damage (whether direct, indirect, consequential or otherwise) suffered by the recipient of this material or any other person. This material is not intended to provide, and should not be relied on for, accounting, legal or tax advice. Any references to securities, sectors, regions and/or countries are for illustrative purposes only. You should note that past performance is not a reliable indicator of future performance. Schroders may record and monitor telephone calls for security, training and compliance purposes.