60 seconds with Huw van Steenis on why central banks are getting it wrong
Central banks are getting it wrong in part because they have the wrong models. They assume a frictionless economy, where money zips around and no-one ever defaults. Alas, this just is not the case.
This is also why quantitative easing is increasingly a spent force. Take, for example, the recent programme by the European Central Bank (ECB). It has offered to pay banks to lend money to the real economy and yet eurozone banks have taken less than 5% of the €1.6 trillion of loans the ECB has offered to pay.
If low rates are problematic, negative rates are probably even worse and central banks underestimate the negative impacts on the banking system itself. Take, for instance, Switzerland, where the Swiss banks have put up their prices rather than put them down.
So, what do we need to do? We need to put financial frictions into these central bank models. That does not mean going soft on the banks; we think the case for stress testing banks and having a resilient banking system is even stronger. But it means a greater focus on fiscal policy, on infrastructure spending and maybe thinking twice about the negative consequences of quantitative easing.
Huw van Steenis' full analysis is available here.
- Why global cities could be more valuable than high-performing tech stocks
- How we hold companies to account on their climate change plans
- How the FTSE 100 returned 122% in 20 years but barely moved
- How the ageing population could be a boon for investors
- Coronavirus to hit already reeling Japanese economy
- Why “corporate karma” is crucial for your investment returns
The views and opinions contained herein are those of Schroders’ investment teams and/or Economics Group, and do not necessarily represent Schroder Investment Management North America Inc.’s house views. These views are subject to change. This information is intended to be for information purposes only and it is not intended as promotional material in any respect.