Energy crisis: not losing sight of net zero
Energy crisis: not losing sight of net zero
British drivers bought more electric cars in March 2022 alone than in the whole of 2019, despite the wider car market slumping and supply chain difficulties making it hard to buy electric vehicles – or any car – at the moment.
The shift towards electric vehicles had been well underway before the recent spike in energy prices, but this has accelerated as high oil prices render traditional internal combustion engines pricier for consumers. “Gas and coal prices are four times higher than they were a year ago, making the comparative economics of renewable energy sources significantly better,” says Felix Odey, Portfolio Manager for the Schroders Global Energy Transition Team.
While soaring oil and gas prices have been exacerbated by Russia’s invasion of Ukraine, energy costs were already increasing. Oil and gas markets have seen new supply dwindle as a result of underinvestment in recent years. For one thing, energy companies have been reluctant to increase production: “The international focus on reaching net zero means that many management teams have been looking down the barrel of a gun, not knowing what demand there is going to be for their end products in ten years,” says Felix.
In addition, fewer investors and lenders are willing to finance new fossil fuel development. The combination has led to a tighter market, higher prices and strong returns from conventional energy markets.
Does the current energy crisis mean we will have to ‘front-load’ carbon emissions?
“The practical net zero challenges that countries are facing – namely how to wean their economies off fossil fuels whilst maintaining or achieving energy security – were already clear before the invasion of Ukraine. What’s changed is that those issues are now front and centre,” says Catherine Hampton, Sustainable Investment Lead at Cazenove Capital. She argues that the current energy crisis is likely to shift countries’ net zero pathways, with some countries potentially front-loading their carbon emissions as they ramp up production to ease the cost on consumers of rising energy prices.
If this crisis had happened anytime previously, I don’t think that would have been the default response. You have seen a political step change.
“What’s been positive, particularly in Europe, is policymakers responding to the recent energy security crisis with plans for greater renewable energy deployment,” says Alex Monk, Portfolio Manager for the Schroders Global Energy Transition Team. Therefore, despite higher fossil fuel use in the short term, the medium-to-long-term strategy is for renewables to dominate the energy mix.
This is something new within policy, Alex points out: “If this crisis had happened anytime previously, I don’t think that would have been the default response. You have seen a political step change.” The conclusion is that, if countries see higher emissions in the next few years, they will need to increase the pace of decarbonisation – for example, by ramping up renewables significantly – to achieve their net zero goals.
Take the German government, for example. It has approved wide-ranging energy reforms that should triple renewable energy sources by 2030 and ensure energy security in the wake of Russia’s invasion of Ukraine. Some EU and US policymakers have suggested that people work from home to reduce the amount of fuel required for transport too.
Despite these steps, there has still been an increase in the amount of coal and gas Europe has used, which may consequently mean moving countries towards their emissions targets at a faster pace than they may have planned. Some UK politicians have discussed adding greater incentives for rooftop solar and reducing red tape around renewable energy sources. But, only small actionable steps have been taken in this area so far.
The crisis in Ukraine is supportive of the energy transition in the long-term, regardless of any short-term slowing down by some policymakers.
Alex argues there is plenty more that can be done to create dual benefits here. By further incentivising solar panels, consumers can reduce their energy bills and help the country to hit emissions targets, for example. “The crisis in Ukraine is supportive of the energy transition in the long-term, regardless of any short-term slowing down by some policymakers,” Alex adds.
However, these types of schemes tend to reduce bills for the middle classes rather than those who need it most. The poorest in society cannot afford to pay for solar panels, even at a reduced rate. Millions have been plunged into poverty by the cost of living crisis, with many having to choose between energy bills and food. As governments face serious questions around how they can cut fuel costs without further exacerbating the widening gap between rich and poor, using more coal and gas could be an attractive short-term fix.
If you would like to discuss any of the issues raised in this article or would like to find out more about our sustainable investment offering, please email firstname.lastname@example.org or call 0207 658 3100.
Important Information: This communication is marketing material. The views and opinions contained herein are those of the author(s) on this page, and may not necessarily represent views expressed or reflected in other Schroders communications, strategies or funds. This material is intended to be for information purposes only and is not intended as promotional material in any respect. The material is not intended as an offer or solicitation for the purchase or sale of any financial instrument. It is not intended to provide and should not be relied on for accounting, legal or tax advice, or investment recommendations. Reliance should not be placed on the views and information in this document when taking individual investment and/or strategic decisions. Past performance is not a reliable indicator of future results. The value of an investment can go down as well as up and is not guaranteed. All investments involve risks including the risk of possible loss of principal. Information herein is believed to be reliable but Schroders does not warrant its completeness or accuracy. Some information quoted was obtained from external sources we consider to be reliable. No responsibility can be accepted for errors of fact obtained from third parties, and this data may change with market conditions. This does not exclude any duty or liability that Schroders has to its customers under any regulatory system. Regions/ sectors shown for illustrative purposes only and should not be viewed as a recommendation to buy/sell. The opinions in this material include some forecasted views. We believe we are basing our expectations and beliefs on reasonable assumptions within the bounds of what we currently know. However, there is no guarantee than any forecasts or opinions will be realised. These views and opinions may change. The content is issued by Schroder Investment Management Limited, 1 London Wall Place, London EC2Y 5AU. Registered No. 1893220 England. Authorised and regulated by the Financial Conduct Authority.