In focus

Economics

What is "helicopter money" and is it a good idea?


Vicki Owen

Vicki Owen

Modern monetary theory (MMT) argues that, rather than central banks printing money to buy financial assets, governments should create money to directly fund public expenditure or tax cuts.

This is sometimes referred to as a “helicopter drop”, a term coined by American economist Milton Friedman, or “helicopter money”. Some call it “people’s quantitative easing”.

Here’s what Keith Wade had to say on the approach and the potential implications for investors.

Why all the talk of helicopter money and "modern monetary theory"?

Keith Wade said: “It is clear that government borrowing is set to rise significantly as a result of the Covid-19 pandemic and this will put tremendous pressure on public finances. Government debt to income levels are already high in many economies as a result of the global financial crisis but now look set to rise significantly higher. In this environment, the idea of financing spending through printing money rather than issuing bonds becomes very appealing.”

How does it work?

Keith Wade explained: “The key difference between quantitative easing and MMT is that the central bank prints money which is fed directly into the economy, either through tax cuts or increased spending, rather than by buying assets.

“Consequently, it would have a more immediate effect in boosting demand rather than waiting for higher asset prices to feed through to the economy. It also avoids the criticism of QE that it increases inequality by supporting wealthy asset holders.”

What are the dangers?

Keith Wade said: “On the downside, it is potentially more inflationary. This is in part due to its more direct effect on activity, but mainly because the government does not have any future liability in the form of bond issuance where the bonds have to be repaid at some point in time. Therefore it undermines fiscal responsibility.

“Hence MMT is a policy more often associated with failing states than with developed economies and, unless done within prescribed limits and seen to be temporary, would result in a ratings downgrade for the government’s debt and higher interest rate costs.”

Are we close to seeing MMT in action?

Keith Wade said: “Arguably governments have already done some MMT as little of the QE has been reversed and the interest generated on the assets has been fed back to the exchequer, which can then be used to fund spending. So perhaps they are getting away with it. Ultimately it’s a matter of scale: MMT in Germany led to hyperinflation during the 1920s, but they printed multiples of GDP as the fiscal position was already undermined.”

What are the implications for investments?

Keith Wade said: “If accompanied by a loss of fiscal discipline, MMT would make investors concerned about higher inflation. Bond yields would rise significantly as investors demanded more compensation for higher prices in the future. This in turn would have an adverse effect on risk assets such as equities which would de-rate (i.e. price/earnings ratios would fall) as bond yields rose.”

Important Information: This communication is marketing material. The views and opinions contained herein are those of the author(s) on this page, and may not necessarily represent views expressed or reflected in other Schroders communications, strategies or funds. This material is intended to be for information purposes only and is not intended as promotional material in any respect. The material is not intended as an offer or solicitation for the purchase or sale of any financial instrument. It is not intended to provide and should not be relied on for accounting, legal or tax advice, or investment recommendations. Reliance should not be placed on the views and information in this document when taking individual investment and/or strategic decisions. Past performance is not a reliable indicator of future results. The value of an investment can go down as well as up and is not guaranteed. All investments involve risks including the risk of possible loss of principal. Information herein is believed to be reliable but Schroders does not warrant its completeness or accuracy. Some information quoted was obtained from external sources we consider to be reliable. No responsibility can be accepted for errors of fact obtained from third parties, and this data may change with market conditions. This does not exclude any duty or liability that Schroders has to its customers under any regulatory system. Regions/ sectors shown for illustrative purposes only and should not be viewed as a recommendation to buy/sell. The opinions in this material include some forecasted views. We believe we are basing our expectations and beliefs on reasonable assumptions within the bounds of what we currently know. However, there is no guarantee than any forecasts or opinions will be realised. These views and opinions may change.  The content is issued by Schroder Investment Management Limited, 1 London Wall Place, London EC2Y 5AU. Registered No. 1893220 England. Authorised and regulated by the Financial Conduct Authority.

Contact Schroders Wealth Management

To discuss your wealth management requirements, or to find out more about our services and how we can help you, please contact:

Marc Brodard

Marc Brodard

Head of Private Clients - Switzerland
Telephone:
marc.brodard@schroders.com