Gold hits record high – but is it really too expensive?
Gold hits record high – but is it really too expensive?
The gold price has been rising steadily. On 7 August, it has hit an all-time high of $2,072.5/oz, beating its previous record high of $1,922 from 2011. Such heights have led some investors to rue missing out on gold’s recent moves, viewing it now as expensive or even in a bubble.
After a year-to-date rise of more than 20%, following a similar rise in 2019, this is an understandable reaction. But taking a long-term view, of years not weeks, we don’t think it’s the correct reaction. Gold equities in particular are signalling that this cycle has a lot further to run.
Are there any signs of a bubble in gold?
Looking at history, it’s worth pointing out that gold bull markets tend to end in sharp moves upwards, virtually in a straight line.
In 2011 for example, gold surged around 15% in the month before the peak and only ever traded above $1,800 for 19 days.
The peak average annual price was actually in 2012 at $1,669, well below current levels. In 1981, gold prices moved 80% between December 1979 and January 1980, an even more aggressive parabolic move.
We came up with a checklist of warning signs to help us and other investors gauge whether gold is already in some kind of dangerous bubble phase. The result is that, we find very obvious differences between now and 2011.
One area where momentum has been clearly aggressive is in ETF buying of physical gold. It has been the standout (in fact the only) area of demand growth in the 2020 gold market.
The numbers themselves are indeed very striking. According to published data, 643 tonnes have been added to physical gold ETFs so far this year, comparing to 372 tonnes added in all of 2019. In 2009, we saw a record annual increase of 665 tonnes.
For comparison, 656 tonnes equate to almost 40% of global gold production. Since the Federal Reserve effectively declared in April that it would do “whatever it takes” to keep the economy from collapsing, ETF holdings of gold have risen 72 out of 79 days.
Is the scale of total ETF holdings representing an unsustainable bubble?
We don't think so.
In an era of truly gargantuan global liquidity creation and highly elevated financial asset valuations, what really matters is how large these holdings (3200 metric tonnes in total or 104 million ounces) are on a relative basis.
Looked at this way, gold holdings are not particularly high at all. In 2011, gold ETF holdings represented c.10% of all ETF holdings globally. Today, that number is closer to 2.5%. Looked at on a more aggregate measure we estimate above-ground gold stocks represent just over 2.7% of total global financial assets, a vastly lower number than either 2011, 1980 or 1974.
Cycle has much further to run
Against a backdrop of record high global debt, we believe we are moving through a major epoch-change in global macro policy towards a much greater acceptance of inflationary outcomes. The result is likely to be more deeply negative real interest rates and greater risk of broad currency debasement.
In this environment, continued increases in gold allocations could have extraordinary impacts on aggregate private gold holdings. We don't see why gold prices should be somehow capped at current levels at all in such an environment.
For gold producers, current operating conditions are exceptionally good and again stand in stark contrast to 2011. On the revenue side, gold prices are being driven by understandably strong demand for gold as a monetary hedge. Meanwhile, operating costs remain broadly under control and management attitudes to large scale capital spending remain conservative. This is leading to both record operating margins and record forecast free cash flow generation, which is likely in turn to trigger material increases in distributions to shareholders.
Despite this, gold equities have barely begun to outperform the price of bullion itself, another sign this cycle has much further to run.
Any security(s) mentioned above is for illustrative purpose only, not a recommendation to invest or divest.
This document is intended to be for information purposes only and it is not intended as promotional material in any respect. The views and opinions contained herein are those of the author(s), and do not necessarily represent views expressed or reflected in other Schroders communications, strategies or funds. The material is not intended to provide, and should not be relied on for investment advice or recommendation. Opinions stated are matters of judgment, which may change. Information herein is believed to be reliable, but Schroder Investment Management (Hong Kong) Limited does not warrant its completeness or accuracy.
Investment involves risks. Past performance and any forecasts are not necessarily a guide to future or likely performance. You should remember that the value of investments can go down as well as up and is not guaranteed. Exchange rate changes may cause the value of the overseas investments to rise or fall. For risks associated with investment in securities in emerging and less developed markets, please refer to the relevant offering document.
The information contained in this document is provided for information purpose only and does not constitute any solicitation and offering of investment products. Potential investors should be aware that such investments involve market risk and should be regarded as long-term investments.
Derivatives carry a high degree of risk and should only be considered by sophisticated investors.
This material, including the website, has not been reviewed by the SFC. Issued by Schroder Investment Management (Hong Kong) Limited.
- Schroders Institutional Investor Study shows the continued rise of private assets
- Infographic: A snapshot of the world economy
- Schroder Institutional Investor Study 2020: Investors back private assets despite Covid-19 uncertainty
- Why we upgraded our forecast for global GDP growth
- Everything you need to know about sustainable investing
- Navigating China’s “healthy bull market”