COP27: an historic deal was made, but what comes next?
COP27: an historic deal was made, but what comes next?
The COP27 conference was dominated by critical discussions on the creation of a new fund to address the costs of loss and damage. These are the costs of climate change that go beyond what countries can adapt to and mitigate against.
For more than 30 years, developing countries have asked developed countries to provide compensation for the damage global warming has inflicted on their economies.
It has always been a highly controversial issue; richer countries have been concerned about liability claims for climate damage caused by their emissions.
After two weeks of intense negotiations, an historic deal on loss and damage was struck, as the nations decided “to establish new funding arrangements for assisting developing countries that are particularly vulnerable to the adverse effects of climate change, in responding to loss and damage.”
This is a very important agreement, reflecting the fact that the costs of global warming have become much more visible and severe. We think the deal has the potential to boost geopolitical stability between poor and rich countries, while improving growth outcomes for developing nations.
However, much of the detail still needs to be defined. For example, the United Nations text does not include how much money will be provided in the fund. A committee with representatives from 24 countries will need to decide who contributes to the fund and who will benefit from it.
We also saw other positive developments during climate negotiations in Egypt. The Global Shield, a new funding mechanism, was launched by the G7 group of wealthy nations and was backed by the V20 (the Vulnerable 20 Group of Ministers of Finance of the Climate Vulnerable Forum).
This is a new insurance-based mechanism that will provide poor and vulnerable people with better pre-arranged finance against disasters.
So far, the total promised is around US$282 million. This is a significant step to improving the outlook of climate-vulnerable and developing nations. However, we also need to highlight that the money promised so far looks very small when compared to the economic costs of climate change. In Pakistan alone, it is estimated that this year’s floods caused damage of around US$30 billion.
Another positive outcome of COP27 was the decision to allow vulnerable countries to add new climate resilient debt clauses (CRDCs) to bonds that will be sold on international capital markets.
This is another important step that can help poor countries cope with the economic impact of climate disasters, as they will now be allowed to freeze their sovereign debt repayments for a maximum of two years.
While current policies are not in line with the 1.5C target of the Paris Agreement, hopes for greater ambition were low.
Countries were asked to update and strengthen their nationally determined contributions (NDCs) for 2030 to limit global warming to 1.5C. Only five countries have increased their ambition, according to analysis by the research organisation Climate Action Tracker.
India, backed by more than 80 countries, wanted to extend the agreement from 2021 to phase down coal to other fossil fuels. The final Sharm El-Sheikh declaration does not include an explicit reference to reducing the production of oil and gas. There is, however, a call for an increase in renewable energy as well as low-emission energy.
This is likely to support more investment into the renewable energy sector, but also in gas, as this energy source is much less carbon-intensive than coal and oil.
Demands for more ambitious mitigation, essential to reach the 1.5C target, remain. Nature-based solutions, which represent a key mitigation tool, will be a critical topic when world leaders meet again in Montreal for the 15th Conference of the Parties (COP15) to the United Nations Convention on Biological Diversity.
Climate and biodiversity are deeply interlinked. COP15 is likely to set out new goals and develop an action plan for nature over the next decade. A new biodiversity framework is expected to be finalised at COP15 to address and reverse global biodiversity decline.
- Attractive opportunities in the “middle ground” of credit
- True engagement will move the dial on climate targets
- Value’s resurgence: flash in the pan or here to stay?
- Contagion or contained: banks in focus
- Watch: Is the Asian credit market a bright spot for investors?
- The dollar smile theory: what is it and is it still valid in the new market regime?
The contents of this document may not be reproduced or distributed in any manner without prior permission.
This document is intended to be for information purposes only and it is not intended as promotional material in any respect nor is it to be construed as any solicitation and offering to buy or sell any investment products. The views and opinions contained herein are those of the author(s), and do not necessarily represent views expressed or reflected in other Schroders communications, strategies or funds. The material is not intended to provide, and should not be relied on for investment advice or recommendation. Any security(ies) mentioned above is for illustrative purpose only, not a recommendation to invest or divest. Opinions stated are valid as of the date of this document and are subject to change without notice. Information herein and information from third party are believed to be reliable, but Schroder Investment Management (Hong Kong) Limited does not warrant its completeness or accuracy.
Investment involves risks. Past performance and any forecasts are not necessarily a guide to future or likely performance. You should remember that the value of investments can go down as well as up and is not guaranteed. You may not get back the full amount invested. Derivatives carry a high degree of risk. Exchange rate changes may cause the value of the overseas investments to rise or fall. If investment returns are not denominated in HKD/USD, US/HK dollar-based investors are exposed to exchange rate fluctuations. Please refer to the relevant offering document including the risk factors for further details.
This material has not been reviewed by the SFC. Issued by Schroder Investment Management (Hong Kong) Limited.