TalkingEconomics: Are investors complacent?
Our economics team review market performance year-to-date, consider whether we have seen the end of the "Trump trade" and ask if investors have become complacent.
- In reviewing the performance of markets so far this year, we find that equities have been the best performing asset class. Gold and corporate bonds have also done well, but commodities were the worst performers.
- Rising equity markets and low volatility raise the question as to whether investors are becoming complacent, especially against a backdrop of falling bond yields and elevated political uncertainty.
Mid-year markets review
2017 has been an interesting year for investors so far. US President Trump's promises of tax cuts, infrastructure spending and deregulation drove the "Trump reflation trade" at the end of 2016. Although it continued into early 2017, investors have lost some faith in the president's ability to deliver on his promises and the rally has faded in recent months.
So far this year, equities have been the best asset class to be invested in. Commodities have been the worst with oil having re-entered bear market territory (despite OPEC production cuts), although gold has been relatively resilient. Among equities, Europe and emerging markets were the leading performers, helped by better risk sentiment and a softer US dollar (which has been one of the weakest currencies this year so far).
Past performance is not a guide to future performance and may not be repeated.
In the fixed income world, the best performance within government bond markets came from UK gilts as a slowing economy and Brexit uncertainty made the safe haven asset more attractive. US Treasuries also performed well, although most of this was as a result of the unwinding of the “Trump trade”. As for credit markets, US markets outperformed their European peers comfortably, against a backdrop of falling bond yields but rising equity markets.
Amongst currencies, the euro and yen have both performed well on a trade-weighted basis, while the US dollar has depreciated. Most other currencies have remained stable.
Are current trends sustainable?
The fall in government bond yields alongside the ongoing rally in equities suggests investors are split on the current outlook. Volatility remains very low despite the Federal Reserve’s (Fed) tightening policy. While liquidity is ample and has in the past been a major factor in causing these markets to move in the same direction and suppressing volatility, history suggests that this trend is unsustainable.
The fall in oil prices is a possible factor for the current state of markets. Although lower oil prices will hit the energy sector, with lower inflation ahead, some central banks like the Fed and Bank of England may become less ambitious in tightening monetary policy, while some, such as the European Central Bank (ECB), may be forced to step up stimulus again. This suggests risk assets1 could continue to do well, especially as growth continues unabated, while inflation remains low.
Are investors complacent?
The strength of equities against a backdrop of falling bond yields and elevated political uncertainty has raised the question as to whether investors are becoming complacent. Their complacency is evidenced by the new lows seen in the Chicago Board Options Exchange (CBOE) Volatility Index, often referred to as the "fear gauge".
It could be argued that volatility is low because investors are now comfortable with the three primary factors that have driven volatility in recent years. Specifically, concerns about the Fed tightening monetary policy, China’s currency policy and the oil price have all eased. We would add that the current low level of volatility today also owes something to favourable political outcomes in Europe where there has been no swing toward populism.
Threats to low volatility
That said, the next shock to markets may not be driven by the Fed, oil or China. It could be geopolitical in origin, for while political risks may have eased in Europe, they are building in Asia. Notwithstanding such an outcome, of the three main drivers discussed, Chinese currency policy seems to be less of a concern although the oil price risks falling further.
The greatest worry is on US interest rates where the market appears to be underestimating the potential for higher rates. The desire to normalise remains high and rates are still well below where most models would have them given where the US is in its economic cycle. At present the market is only discounting one, or possibly two, more rate hikes to the end of 2018. Meanwhile, the Federal Open Market Committee (FOMC) members put rates at just over 2% at the end of 2018.
Complacency may be hard to resist
However, such pressures will not become apparent until further out. Low inflation will keep the Fed cautious and the start of balance sheet reduction will probably see the Fed pause rate rises for six months to monitor any more general tightening of financial conditions.
Unless the Fed signals otherwise, the difference of opinion between the market and the FOMC may not be resolved until spring next year. Meanwhile, central bank asset purchases are likely to continue to expand.
In this environment investors may find it hard to resist being "complacent" as liquidity will continue to drive markets with the risk that they move into bubble territory.
1. Risk assets are those that have a significant degree of price volatility, such as equities, commodities, and high yield bonds.↩
This communication is marketing material. The views and opinions contained herein are those of the named author(s) on this page, and may not necessarily represent views expressed or reflected in other Schroders communications, strategies or funds.
This document is intended to be for information purposes only and it is not intended as promotional material in any respect. The material is not intended as an offer or solicitation for the purchase or sale of any financial instrument. The material is not intended to provide, and should not be relied on for, accounting, legal or tax advice, or investment recommendations. Information herein is believed to be reliable but Schroder Investment Management Ltd (Schroders) does not warrant its completeness or accuracy.
The data has been sourced by Schroders and should be independently verified before further publication or use. No responsibility can be accepted for error of fact or opinion. This does not exclude or restrict any duty or liability that Schroders has to its customers under the Financial Services and Markets Act 2000 (as amended from time to time) or any other regulatory system. Reliance should not be placed on the views and information in the document when taking individual investment and/or strategic decisions.
Past Performance is not a guide to future performance. The value of investments and the income from them may go down as well as up and investors may not get back the amounts originally invested. Exchange rate changes may cause the value of any overseas investments to rise or fall.
Any sectors, securities, regions or countries shown above are for illustrative purposes only and are not to be considered a recommendation to buy or sell.
The forecasts included should not be relied upon, are not guaranteed and are provided only as at the date of issue. Our forecasts are based on our own assumptions which may change. Forecasts and assumptions may be affected by external economic or other factors.
Issued by Schroder Unit Trusts Limited, 31 Gresham Street, London, EC2V 7QA. Registered Number 4191730 England. Authorised and regulated by the Financial Conduct Authority.