A new bond from Barclays has served to highlight the value in the bank’s shares


Kevin Murphy

Kevin Murphy

Fund Manager, Equity Value

The Bank of England’s financial policy committee, the UK’s new banking watchdog, has picked up the baton from its predecessors at the financial services authority in calling for banks to be better capitalised and, while it might be helpful if the banks had some guidance on just how much capital could be considered enough, it is difficult to criticise the underlying sentiment.

One aspect to have particularly attracted regulatory interest is what is becoming known in the market as ‘contingent capital’. This is effectively a bond (counting as capital for a bank) but with a twist. Should the issuing bank’s capital ratios drop below a certain level, the bond is wiped out and the debt’s holders receive nothing whatsoever in return.

Capital instruments along such lines have cropped up a few times in recent years but the first of the new breed the regulator has been pushing for has been issued by Barclays. Pulling out the key points from the prospectus, the 10-year bond goes out to November 2022 and the upside for investors is that it pays a fixed coupon of a little over 7.5% a year.

However, while this upside is bond-like, the downside in the event of financial distress – in this instance, if Barclays’ core tier 1 ratio drops below 7% – is that the contingent capital investor ends up with nothing. In contrast, Barclays just carries on because the removal of the bond liability effectively serves to inject capital into the business. That is what these instruments are designed to do.

Barclays was on record as saying it was unsure what the demand would be for its bonds but, as it turns out, they were oversubscribed with $3bn-worth (£1.9bn) launched in total. In the current environment, where people are desperate for income, it is understandable that investors are keen to access premium yields.

Nevertheless, upside of 7.5% income a year versus downside of potentially losing your entire investment seems asymmetrical – not least when making a similar analysis of Barclays’ equity. The bank’s shares currently yield some 2.75%, which is a real yield – meaning it will grow with inflation. The bond’s 7.5%, on the other hand, is nominal so inflation will eat into that every year to 2022.

Taking inflation at, say, 2.5% a year, investors in the bonds are really seeing around two and a quarter percentage points a year more in yield than the equity investors, with essentially the same downside. But – and it is quite a ‘but’ – the equity investors also have all the upside of any resolution to the current banking environment over the next 10 years.

In itself, the launch of the bonds looks to be good news for Barclays’ equity holders for three reasons, the first being that more capital means a greater ‘buffer’ for them should things go wrong. Second, the fact there was so much demand for the bonds suggests the launch was priced reasonably cheaply. We would also argue it serves to highlight the undervaluation of the bank’s equity – particularly when compared with these bonds.

Finally, one would have to assume those investors who bought the bonds do not believe the downside case will actually happen – otherwise they would not have bought them. If the bond market is correct and Barclays avoids potential potholes, then the equity should significantly increase over the course of the next decade, which is the time horizon of these bonds.



Kevin Murphy

Kevin Murphy

Fund Manager, Equity Value

I joined Schroders in 2000 as an equity analyst with a focus on construction and building materials.  In 2006, Nick Kirrage and I took over management of a fund that seeks to identify and exploit deeply out of favour investment opportunities. In 2010, Nick and I also took over management of the team's flagship UK value fund seeking to offer income and capital growth.

Important Information:

The views and opinions displayed are those of Nick Kirrage, Andrew Lyddon, Kevin Murphy, Andrew Williams, Andrew Evans, Simon Adler, Juan Torres Rodriguez, Liam Nunn, Vera German and Roberta Barr, members of the Schroder Global Value Equity Team (the Value Perspective Team), and other independent commentators where stated.

They do not necessarily represent views expressed or reflected in other Schroders' communications, strategies or funds. The Team has expressed its own views and opinions on this website and these may change.

This article is intended to be for information purposes only and it is not intended as promotional material in any respect. Reliance should not be placed on the views and information on the website when taking individual investment and/or strategic decisions. Nothing in this article should be construed as advice. The sectors/securities shown above are for illustrative purposes only and are not to be considered a recommendation to buy/sell.

Past performance is not a guide to future performance and may not be repeated. The value of investments and the income from them may go down as well as up and investors may not get back the amounts originally invested.