Bitcoin's own valuation measure is meaningless
Aficionados of bitcoin and other so-called ‘crypto assets’ have started to refer to their own kind of valuation measure – the NVT ratio. The only snag being it tells people nothing about valuation
As the perceived worth of a single bitcoin crisscrossed its way around the $10,000 (£7,455) mark for much of last week, here on The Value Perspective, we revisited articles from 20 June 2017 and 20 October 2017, when one bitcoin respectively bought you $2,779 and very nearly $6,000.
Each time our primary concern was there was just no way of assessing its true value – but could we have been wrong?
One of the most basic ways of assessing how a company is being valued by investors is to look at its price/earning (P/E) ratio – that is, its share price divided by its earnings-per-share – and comparing that, for example, with history, with its peers or with the wider market.
Now it turns out aficionados of bitcoin and other so-called ‘crypto assets’ have started to refer to their own kind of P/E ratio.
At first glance this might sound odd – after all, bitcoin and the others do not actually produce any earnings – but, on closer investigation … well, it is odder still.
The measure’s actual name is the Network Value to Transactions (NVT) ratio, which – to take bitcoin as an example – is essentially the market value of all the bitcoins in the world divided by the US dollar value of transaction activity.
So the first curious things about the NVT is it includes a reference to the value of the crypto-asset on both sides of the equation, which is redundant.
Another curiosity is that the ratio effectively boils down to considering the value of an asset relative to how much speculation there is in it – meaning, if you want the NVT valuation of a bitcoin to fall, you just need to trade it more and more.
The metric fuels more speculation and more interest
This may of course, be why bitcoin investors are so keen on the metric – the more they speculate, the ‘cheaper’ their favourite asset becomes and the more they can encourage fresh interest in the market.
As an example, according to Woobull.com, the bitcoin’s NVT stood at around 60x at the time of our June article, close to 100x at the time of our October one and is back down to around 60x now.
While its advocates may argue the NVT ratio is similar to the P/E ratio, it is actually akin to looking at the market capitalisation of a company – put simply, its size – divided by the value of the shares being traded daily.
Doing the maths on three arbitrary well-known companies tells us GlaxoSmithKline, Centrica and Proctor & Gamble are respectively on 550x, 193x and 321x – in other words, just random numbers.
So we would argue that, while the NVT may be gaining greater currency (sorry) among crypto-asset investors, it does not tell anyone a great deal about anything – or at least not about the asset under consideration.
It might, however, tell us something about the human race’s inherent need for reassurance they are not doing something silly.
Fund Manager, Equity Value
I joined Schroders in 2015 as a member of the Value Investment team. Prior to joining Schroders I was responsible for the UK research process at Threadneedle. I began my investment career in 2001 at Dresdner Kleinwort as a Pan-European transport analyst.
The views and opinions displayed are those of Nick Kirrage, Andrew Lyddon, Kevin Murphy, Andrew Williams, Andrew Evans, Simon Adler, Juan Torres Rodriguez, Liam Nunn, Vera German and Roberta Barr, members of the Schroder Global Value Equity Team (the Value Perspective Team), and other independent commentators where stated.
They do not necessarily represent views expressed or reflected in other Schroders' communications, strategies or funds. The Team has expressed its own views and opinions on this website and these may change.
This article is intended to be for information purposes only and it is not intended as promotional material in any respect. Reliance should not be placed on the views and information on the website when taking individual investment and/or strategic decisions. Nothing in this article should be construed as advice. The sectors/securities shown above are for illustrative purposes only and are not to be considered a recommendation to buy/sell.
Past performance is not a guide to future performance and may not be repeated. The value of investments and the income from them may go down as well as up and investors may not get back the amounts originally invested.