China's steel and concrete sectors are indicative of something potentially wrong
Investors can often make the mistake of anchoring their perceptions on the current environment rather than recognising there could be a different environment in future, and this is neatly illustrated by two separate but not entirely unconnected pieces of data about China.
Recent years have seen the country effectively dictate lending policy for its banks, which has included encouraging very significant investment in infrastructure and property. This has in turn led to huge amounts of money being spent on building up China’s steel and cement capacity to a mind-boggling degree.
As a result, idle – that is, currently unneeded – capacity in China’s steel sector is equivalent to the total steel production capacity of Japan and South Korea combined. Irrespective of this, China is in the process of building an additional 60 million tons of steel production.
As we also saw in the case of the Hong Kong-listed construction machinery manufacturer Zoomlion Heavy Industry Science and Technology in The hole truth, China’s solution to a lot of its problems is just to build more, even if the existing capacity is not being used – and it is the same story with cement. China consumes more cement than the rest of the world combined but it has idle capacity in cement production greater than the entire consumption of India, Japan and the US put together.
These are enormous imbalances and, in a fully functioning price mechanism, that capacity would not have been built. Quite simply, you do not build capacity in any area unless you have demand for it. It costs a lot of money to build supply and, if there is no demand, you will not make an economic return on your investment.
Of course, China may continue to grow rapidly and the capacity may be fully utilised some years in the future. Nevertheless, until the point is reached that the capacity is required, such a course of action represents an inefficient use of resources.
Consensus has it a ‘hard’ landing in China would be annual GDP growth of 5%, down from a current level of around 8%, but the allocation of resources in the country’s steel and concrete sectors are indicative of something potentially wrong with the Chinese model. If China does not continue to grow rapidly, a slowdown will not result in ‘only’ 5% GDP growth – the bear case is significantly lower.
Our point here is not to make any comment on what may or may not happen in China but to highlight how people are anchoring off the current environment and what has been achieved over the last decade. They see the 8% figure and then form the view a really bad number would be a couple of percentage points below that when a really bad number would actually be preceded by a minus sign.
Fund Manager, Equity Value
I joined Schroders in 2000 as an equity analyst with a focus on construction and building materials. In 2006, Nick Kirrage and I took over management of a fund that seeks to identify and exploit deeply out of favour investment opportunities. In 2010, Nick and I also took over management of the team's flagship UK value fund seeking to offer income and capital growth.
The views and opinions displayed are those of Nick Kirrage, Andrew Lyddon, Kevin Murphy, Andrew Williams, Andrew Evans, Simon Adler, Juan Torres Rodriguez, Liam Nunn, Vera German and Roberta Barr, members of the Schroder Global Value Equity Team (the Value Perspective Team), and other independent commentators where stated.
They do not necessarily represent views expressed or reflected in other Schroders' communications, strategies or funds. The Team has expressed its own views and opinions on this website and these may change.
This article is intended to be for information purposes only and it is not intended as promotional material in any respect. Reliance should not be placed on the views and information on the website when taking individual investment and/or strategic decisions. Nothing in this article should be construed as advice. The sectors/securities shown above are for illustrative purposes only and are not to be considered a recommendation to buy/sell.
Past performance is not a guide to future performance and may not be repeated. The value of investments and the income from them may go down as well as up and investors may not get back the amounts originally invested.