Don’t blame it on Rio – Glencore may turn out to be fortunate it had its advances rebuffed


Ian Kelly

Ian Kelly

Fund Manager, Equity Value

The enthusiasm that greeted rumours of a takeover bid by Glencore for Rio Tinto to create a £100bn mining and commodities-trading giant was in no way dampened by the sector’s current poor health. At The Value Perspective, our shopping list of stocks often contains some of the worst-returning share prices over the past quarter or year. That being the case, the table below might suggest base metals mining stocks should be piled high in our investments, but they are not. Why is that?

Don't Blame It On Rio Chart 1

Source: Bloomberg 2014

For The Value Perspective, it comes down to the lack of a valuation floor in the sector. A good way to underline our concerns is to consider the price of iron ore, which – as the following chart shows – stands at around half of its 2013 peak.

Don't Blame It On Rio Chart 2

Source: Bloomberg 2014

The trouble is, as the chart below illustrates, that price is still significantly higher than it has been for much of the last 20 years. It therefore seems reasonable to suggest investors in mining company shares either need to have a reasonable thesis as to why the iron ore price will stay at very elevated levels compared with its long-term history or be confident they will still make money even if it halves again.

Don't Blame It On Rio Chart 3

Source: Index Mundi 2014

We do not believe we can predict the future, nor are we claiming iron ore prices will fall back to $54 (£34) a tonne – we just want our investment to be able to survive such mean reversion to a long-term inflation-adjusted price, and also offer a decent cashflow yield with a sustainable balance sheet if that situation were to persist. We would be keen to hear suggestions of miners that offer these characteristics but, so far, we have failed to find any ourselves.

We are not closed-minded to investments in the sector. We actually remain of the view that mining is an industry with better dynamics than it has had in the past and indeed iron ore has particularly positive aspects – not least the fact that a significant proportion of the market is effectively a global oligopoly. Unfortunately, there is little in the history of the sector to suggest that greater consolidation actually leads to better-run businesses.

There is also a very negative dynamic to commodities, which is that the best ways to reduce costs – by building more cost-effective mines, say, or investing in more efficient machinery – tend to involve producing more of whatever it is you are mining, which in all likelihood also reduces prices. What is more, in the case of iron ore, what you are mining is one of the most abundant minerals on the planet.

 Iron ore is not scarce; unlike copper, say, it does not degrade over time; and, even after the recent falls, it still costs less than half of its current price to produce. To our eyes, this is hardly the time to get more involved in the sector although it appears Glencore thought differently. Maybe the company was looking at the iron ore price in the context of the last few years rather than the last few decades but, just because something has fallen in price, it does not mean it is cheap. It may turn out Rio did it a favour.


Ian Kelly

Ian Kelly

Fund Manager, Equity Value

I joined Schroders European equity research team in 2007 as an analyst specialising in automobiles. After two years I added the insurance sector to my coverage. In early 2010 I moved into a fund management role, and then took over management of two offshore funds investing in European and Global companies seeking to offer income and capital growth. 

Important Information:

The views and opinions displayed are those of Nick Kirrage, Andrew Lyddon, Kevin Murphy, Andrew Williams, Andrew Evans, Simon Adler, Juan Torres Rodriguez, Liam Nunn, Vera German and Roberta Barr, members of the Schroder Global Value Equity Team (the Value Perspective Team), and other independent commentators where stated.

They do not necessarily represent views expressed or reflected in other Schroders' communications, strategies or funds. The Team has expressed its own views and opinions on this website and these may change.

This article is intended to be for information purposes only and it is not intended as promotional material in any respect. Reliance should not be placed on the views and information on the website when taking individual investment and/or strategic decisions. Nothing in this article should be construed as advice. The sectors/securities shown above are for illustrative purposes only and are not to be considered a recommendation to buy/sell.

Past performance is not a guide to future performance and may not be repeated. The value of investments and the income from them may go down as well as up and investors may not get back the amounts originally invested.