Gradually rising interest rates? Don’t be too sure
An analysis of the last 700 years of financial history suggests it would be dangerous for investors to be too confident they know how interest rates are going to behave over the coming years
Last week, under new boss Jerome Powell, the Federal Reserve voted to raise US interest rates by a quarter of a percentage point.
Two months earlier, under outgoing chair Janet Yellen, the US central bank kept rates steady.
At first glance, then, these were two very different rate-setting meetings and yet the two statements issued immediately after each had a great deal in common.
In both, for example, the Fed’s rate-setting committee said it expected that “with further gradual adjustments in the stance of monetary policy”, economic activity would “expand at a moderate pace in the medium term and labour market conditions would remain strong”.
The committee also said it expected economic conditions would “evolve in a manner that will warrant further gradual increases”.
That word “gradual” has also cropped up in the context of interest rates on this side of the Atlantic, with Bank of England governor Mark Carney using it more than once towards the end of last year as he sought to manage market expectations on future rate hikes.
All in all, then that’s pretty reassuring, isn’t it? The powers that be have a plan and, even if UK and US rates are on the up, it is all going to happen, well, gradually.
Interest rates 'lower for longer'?
As we have discussed before, here on The Value Perspective, the link between interest rates and company share prices may not be obvious but it certainly exists, with the historic low rates of recent years helping to push markets to a succession of new highs.
All things considered then, the wider market seems happy enough to go along with the idea interest rates are going to remain ‘lower for longer’.
Not ‘lower for ever’ of course but while, for example, UK rates may be ticking upwards, investors might still feel able to take comfort from the fact they have some way to go before they reach the 5% or so that was seen as the norm in the two decades before the 2008/09 financial crisis.
Investors might feel less reassured, however, if they read a blog that ran on the Bank of England’s Bank Underground site at the end of last year.
Written by Harvard-based historian Paul Schmelzing, Renaissance roots and rapid reversals offers a long-term (a very long-term) take on global interest rates.
Using data going back seven centuries, no less, he argues anyone clinging to a “secular stagnation” narrative – that “markets are trapped in a period of permanently lower equilibrium real rates” – might want to think again.
Regular visitors to The Value Perspective will know our strongly-held view that the future is uncertain and so Schmelzing’s blog certainly strikes a chord.
He has analysed global interest rates going all the way back to 1311 and found evidence that suggests the decline in real interest rates seen since the 1980s fits into a pattern of a much deeper trend stretching back five centuries.
By Schmelzing’s calculations, there have been eight previous “real rate depressions”, where interest rates have fallen for a prolonged period of time.
Now pushing 35 years, he notes, the one we are now living through – with rates in most major economies around the world at or near all-time lows, compared with an average of 2.6% over the last 200 years and 4.78% overall – is the second longest such period on record.
Schmelzing’s most striking conclusion, however, is that every time the world emerges from one of these interest rate depressions, the turnarounds have typically been “both quick and sizable”.
“Most reversals to ‘real rate stagnation’ periods have been rapid, non-linear and took place on average after 26 years,” he continues.
“Within 24 months after hitting their troughs in the rate depression cycle, rates gained on average 315 basis points [3.15%], with two reversals showing real rate appreciations of more than 600 basis points [6%] within two years.”
Ultimately, no one knows what will happen
None of which is to say this will happen this time – only that it would be dangerous for investors to be too confident they know how interest rates are going to behave in the future.
As we wrote in The link between rates and share prices, here on The Value Perspective, we believe only a couple of things can be said on the subject with any confidence:
- A market that has become used to low rates is likely to have some adjustments to make; and
- In the process of making those adjustments, the market is likely to overreact in some areas, creating opportunities for stockpicking investors.
Fund Manager, Equity Value
I joined Schroders in 2015 as a member of the Value Investment team and manage the European Value and European Yield funds. Prior to joining Schroders, I was responsible for the UK research process at Threadneedle. I began my investment career in 2001 at Dresdner Kleinwort as a Pan-European transport analyst and hold a Economics degree.
The views and opinions displayed are those of Nick Kirrage, Andrew Lyddon, Kevin Murphy, Andrew Williams, Andrew Evans, Simon Adler, Juan Torres Rodriguez, Liam Nunn, Vera German, Tom Biddle and Roberta Barr, members of the Schroder Global Value Equity Team (the Value Perspective Team), and other independent commentators where stated.
They do not necessarily represent views expressed or reflected in other Schroders' communications, strategies or funds. The Team has expressed its own views and opinions on this website and these may change.
This article is intended to be for information purposes only and it is not intended as promotional material in any respect. Reliance should not be placed on the views and information on the website when taking individual investment and/or strategic decisions. Nothing in this article should be construed as advice. The sectors/securities shown above are for illustrative purposes only and are not to be considered a recommendation to buy/sell.
Past performance is not a guide to future performance and may not be repeated. The value of investments and the income from them may go down as well as up and investors may not get back the amounts originally invested.