iPaid too much - The Apple bond issue shows the rules of value investing apply equally to debt
Apple’s $17bn (£11bn) corporate bond issue on 30 April stands not only as the largest in debt market history but also as a stark reminder the rules of value investing apply every bit as much to fixed income as they do to equities. If you overpay for something, you are highly unlikely to see the returns you expect and, after just six weeks, Apple’s bond investors were nursing losses of up to 9%.
There are a number of ways to put that in perspective, one of which is that 9% effectively amounts to nearly four years’ worth of coupons – that is, interest payments – on the bonds. Given how low the yield was pitched in the first place, investors simply cannot afford to suffer those sorts of setbacks.
You could also compare the prices of Apple’s bonds and equities and ask what needs to happen to the company’s share price to make the outcomes for both assets the same. Since we know the coupon and we know when the bonds will mature, we are able to calculate, for example, that investors who bought Apple’s 10-year debt at issue and hold it to maturity will make about 2.7% a year.
Turning to Apple’s shares, given how cash-generative the business is, in a scenario where it never sees any sales growth or profits growth again, then your profit multiple would have to fall by some four-fifths to make the outcome the same.
Alternatively, Apple’s profits would have to halve from today’s level to make the outcome the same and, while neither of those scenarios is completely impossible, it certainly takes a pretty bearish outlook to make the bonds seem a more attractive investment than the equities.
As a final point, even though the Apple issue was the biggest-ever corporate bond offering, such was the demand – particularly from private investors one might characterise as ‘debt-market tourists’ who only wanted to buy in on account of the brand involved – the company could actually have sold some $52bn-worth if it had wanted to.
“Be fearful when others are greedy and greedy when others are fearful” is one of Warren Buffett’s best-known exhortations – and a situation where a company could have sold its debt three times over hardly smacks of fear. Those investors who were successful in subscribing to Apple’s bond issue may now be feeling they would have got better value sticking to buying its products.
Fund Manager, Equity Value
I joined Schroders as a graduate in 2005 and have spent most of my time in the business as part of the UK equities team. Between 2006 and 2010 I was a research analyst responsible for producing investment research on companies in the UK construction, business services and telecoms sectors. In mid 2010 I joined Kevin Murphy and Nick Kirrage on the UK value team.
The views and opinions displayed are those of Nick Kirrage, Andrew Lyddon, Kevin Murphy, Andrew Williams, Andrew Evans, Simon Adler, Juan Torres Rodriguez, Liam Nunn, Vera German and Roberta Barr, members of the Schroder Global Value Equity Team (the Value Perspective Team), and other independent commentators where stated.
They do not necessarily represent views expressed or reflected in other Schroders' communications, strategies or funds. The Team has expressed its own views and opinions on this website and these may change.
This article is intended to be for information purposes only and it is not intended as promotional material in any respect. Reliance should not be placed on the views and information on the website when taking individual investment and/or strategic decisions. Nothing in this article should be construed as advice. The sectors/securities shown above are for illustrative purposes only and are not to be considered a recommendation to buy/sell.
Past performance is not a guide to future performance and may not be repeated. The value of investments and the income from them may go down as well as up and investors may not get back the amounts originally invested.