Is South Korea still a ‘value trap’?


Juan Torres Rodriguez

Juan Torres Rodriguez

Research Analyst, Equity Value

Could important market reforms mean South Korea is on the verge of fulfilling the potential so many investors believe it has – or is it, yet again, flattering to deceive?

‘Value trap’ is a term used by investors to describe an asset that appears to have been under-priced by the market but turns out to be cheap for a reason – often because its ability to make profits has in some way been severely and permanently impaired. It tends to be used in relation to companies but plenty of investors have viewed the South Korean market this way over the last couple of decades.

In this time, South Korea has proved awkward to categorise – as investors like to do – as a developed or emerging market. On the one hand, the country’s gross domestic product per person is near – and in some cases ahead of – developed economies and, in Samsung, it boasts one of the world’s largest companies. On the other hand, the posturing of South Korea’s volatile neighbour to the north tends to make markets nervous.

Arguably what has most served to keep South Korea as an emerging market, however, is not geography but the preponderance of ‘chaebols’ – large conglomerates that tend to be run by one person or a handful of people from the same family. These businesses also tend to have lazy balance sheets – that is, large net cash positions, zero debt, low dividend yields – and corporate governance practices that leave a lot to be desired.

Global and emerging market investors have never been in doubt that, were the chaebols to clean up their act and transform themselves into leaner and, yes, cleaner business, then a great deal of value could be unlocked from one of the cheapest markets in the world. In the past, many have identified signs this was happening only, ultimately, to be disappointed – hence the ‘value trap’ tag.

Could now be a good time to invest for value?

So why are we writing about South Korea now on The Value Perspective? Well, a new wave of optimism about the country’s economic prospects has sprung up as a result of – perhaps surprisingly – its new left-wing government. Having come to power last month in an early election that followed the impeachment of former president Park Guen-hye, the new administration is expected to introduce some positive market reforms.

So could it really be possible that – to use the four most dangerous words in investment – ‘this time it’s different’? Writing in his GREED & fear blog, CLSA analyst Christopher Wood shares our circumspection, observing: “Having looked at the Korean market for more years than GREED & fear would care to remember, it is naturally difficult to make the leap of faith that corporate governance reform is finally at hand.

“But if it is really the case, this is a big deal since the Korean market is still cheap, both in absolute terms and relative to its own history.”

South Korea has previously been a popular hunting ground for investors. It was remarked upon in a preface of a 2009 edition of the value investor’s bible, “Security Analysis” by Graham & Dodd.

It noted the disillusionment with South Korean companies in the early 2000s: “Bargain issuers, such as Posco and SK Telecom, ultimately attracted many value seekers; [Warren] Buffett reportedly profited handsomely from a number of South Korean holdings.”

South Korea was also popular with value investors during the depths of the Asian debt crisis in 1998.

But South Korea can also have a habit of failing to live up to investors’ expectations so, here on The Value Perspective, we will not be getting too excited just yet. Still, having watched the market very closely over the last six months, we will continue to do so with even greater interest.


Juan Torres Rodriguez

Juan Torres Rodriguez

Research Analyst, Equity Value

I joined Schroders in January 2017 as a member of the Global Value Investment team. Prior to joining Schroders I worked for the Global Emerging Markets value and income funds at Pictet Asset Management with responsibility over different sectors, among those Consumer, Telecoms and Utilities. Before joining Pictet I was a member of the Customs Solution Group at HOLT Credit Suisse.  

Important Information:

The views and opinions displayed are those of Nick Kirrage, Andrew Lyddon, Kevin Murphy, Andrew Williams, Andrew Evans, Simon Adler, Juan Torres Rodriguez, Liam Nunn, Vera German and Roberta Barr, members of the Schroder Global Value Equity Team (the Value Perspective Team), and other independent commentators where stated.

They do not necessarily represent views expressed or reflected in other Schroders' communications, strategies or funds. The Team has expressed its own views and opinions on this website and these may change.

This article is intended to be for information purposes only and it is not intended as promotional material in any respect. Reliance should not be placed on the views and information on the website when taking individual investment and/or strategic decisions. Nothing in this article should be construed as advice. The sectors/securities shown above are for illustrative purposes only and are not to be considered a recommendation to buy/sell.

Past performance is not a guide to future performance and may not be repeated. The value of investments and the income from them may go down as well as up and investors may not get back the amounts originally invested.