Revealed: The best choice in the Celebrations tin – from a value perspective
Faced with a family-sized tin of chocolates this Christmas, you could simply lunge for your favourite – or you could take a more value-oriented approach that balances the potential risks and rewards
Christmas, as my colleague Andy Williams crooningly reassures us, may well be the most wonderful time of the year but, in social terms, it is also potentially the most blunderful.
And while solutions to age-old concerns such as gifts people truly have always wanted and friction-free family get-togethers are still works-in-progress, here on The Value Perspective, we can shed some light on the most profitable way to approach the Celebrations tin.
The prospect of three friends squaring up at a recent party over the one remaining Maltesers Teaser nestled in a bed of unwanted Mars Bars and Milky Ways prompted thoughts of how a value investor might set about making their own choice from a tin of Celebrations – and the first step, of course, would be to identify some appropriate data to analyse.
And while Celebrations-related statistics may be rather harder to track down than company reports and accounts, pockets do actually exist.
Amount of chocs per tin
This blog, for example, addresses the question of how many different types of chocolate make up an average tin of Celebrations – and concludes, albeit from a less than ideal sample size, that Mars and Bounty bars significantly outnumber Twixes and the two Galaxy representatives.
UK's favourite chocs
This YouGov blog, meanwhile, identifies the UK’s preferred Celebrations (in addition to Heroes, Roses and Quality Streets), which turn out to be the aforementioned Malteser Teasers and Galaxy duo – and very much not Milky Ways and Mars Bars.
So, having found our data – admittedly not perfect, though we are hoping your season of goodwill extends to investment blogs – we now need to define value in a chocolaty context.
Analysing the choc data
Well, value investors do need to be contrarian – that is, they need to like what the wider market prefers to avoid – but they also have to root out undervalued opportunities.
The potential upside here is that the wider market readjusts its view so that it chimes with the value investor’s own analysis of what a business is worth.
That upside, however, needs to be weighed up against the associated risk of ‘permanently impaired capital’. Or, to put it more bluntly, the chance you have picked a losing stock.
These risks can emerge in a number of ways – for example, the company’s balance sheet was not strong enough to see it through troubled times; the industry in which the company operates has seen a structural change that means the forecast upside will never be realised; or perhaps there is some environmental, social or governance (ESG) issue that brings it low.
In a similar vein (sort of), our value Celebrations consumer – to whom we are according the same tastes as the average Brit in that YouGov survey – needs to weigh up their potential risks of ending up with chocolates they do not particularly enjoy versus the potential upside of snaffling all their favourites.
That being so, then, how much is each chocolate ‘worth’?
The value of a Celebration
What our value Celebrations consumer is facing, really, is a trade-off between quantity and quality.
Using our somewhat suspect data – seasonal of goodwill, remember – we can split the tin into ‘winners’ and ‘losers’ in terms of average preferences and numbers.
As the following table shows, the winning batch are Bounty, Maltesers, Mars Bars, Milky Way and Snickers while the losers are the two Galaxy types and the Twixes.
Source: Schroders. For festively illustrative purposes only
As the average Brit’s preferred Celebration, then, the Malteser Teaser may appear the obvious chocolate to lunge for when a Celebrations tin comes your way.
Here on The Value Perspective, however, we would suggest the ‘value’ option should be the Mars Bar.
Yes, it is the most contrarian and risky choice but its potential upside – defined by us as the frequency it appears in the tin – does significantly increase its appeal.
Coming down from our chocolate high and back into the real world, we would freely concede this analysis is flawed in so many ways.
What we hope it has served to illustrate, however, is the basic truth that every investment is a trade-off between risk and reward – and identifying what each of these means to you when making your investment case is crucial to building a portfolio that should prove cause for celebration(s).
All stocks and chocs mentioned are for festively illustrative purposes only and not a recommendation to buy or sell.
Research Analyst, Equity Value
I am an investment analyst for the Global Value Team, having joined Schroders in 2016 as part of the graduate programme. After spending a year as an investment analyst for the Quantitative Equity Products team, I realised my affinity for the deep value investment mindset and joined the Global Value Team in 2017. Prior to working for Schroders I studied mathematics at Oxford University.
The views and opinions displayed are those of Nick Kirrage, Andrew Lyddon, Kevin Murphy, Andrew Williams, Andrew Evans, Simon Adler, Juan Torres Rodriguez, Liam Nunn, Vera German and Roberta Barr, members of the Schroder Global Value Equity Team (the Value Perspective Team), and other independent commentators where stated.
They do not necessarily represent views expressed or reflected in other Schroders' communications, strategies or funds. The Team has expressed its own views and opinions on this website and these may change.
This article is intended to be for information purposes only and it is not intended as promotional material in any respect. Reliance should not be placed on the views and information on the website when taking individual investment and/or strategic decisions. Nothing in this article should be construed as advice. The sectors/securities shown above are for illustrative purposes only and are not to be considered a recommendation to buy/sell.
Past performance is not a guide to future performance and may not be repeated. The value of investments and the income from them may go down as well as up and investors may not get back the amounts originally invested.