Value investing will survive Fortnite – and other tech disruptors
Technology may be gearing up to be as disruptive to the world of games-playing as it is to so much else but that does not mean professional sportspeople – or investors – should be giving up on what they do best
Kyle ‘Bugha’ Giersdorf is 16, lives with his family in Pottsgrove, Pennsylvania and last weekend, by virtue of his extraordinary proficiency at a computer game, he became a millionaire.
At the end of the first-ever Fortnite World Cup, which took place at New York’s Arthur Ashe Stadium, Kyle emerged victorious from a field of 100 of the world’s best gamers to pocket a first prize of $3m (£2.5m).
In case Fortnite has so far passed you by, it is a phenomenally popular online survival game – if you are of a certain vintage, think cult Japanese movie Battle Royale continually being acted out by headset-wearing, controller-punching players all over the world.
And if your children are of a certain vintage, it may well be the reason you do not see them for hours at a time after school or at the weekend.
Mind you, if there is a vague possibility of their picking up a million or two at the end of their endeavours, you might feel more inclined to leave them to it – though clearly Giersdorf has put some significant time into his chosen field.
Significant time invested
Far from becoming a millionaire overnight, according to this CNBC article, he plays Fortnite at least six hours a day – even on schooldays.
And though his parents seem happy his school grades are holding up well, maybe the Giersdorf family need not be too concerned – for clearly there is gold in them there gaming consoles.
Each of the 100 Fortnite World Cup participants was guaranteed $50,000 just for turning up while the total prize pool was $30m – exactly the same as was on offer at this summer’s FIFA Women’s World Cup, notes this Engadget article.
Continuing the remuneration comparisons with real-world sports, Giersdorf’s paycheque was three-quarters of what the entire USA women’s team received for winning the football World Cup; was pretty much in line with the £2.35m Novak Djokovic and Simona Halep each won as the 2019 singles champions at Wimbledon; and was half as much again as the £1.6m golfer Shane Lowry recently pocketed for winning the Open.
Should athletes trade their shoes for controllers?
It would appear, then, that technology is gearing up to be as disruptive to the world of games-playing as it is to so many other parts of life – but does that mean Megan Rapinoe and her teammates, Djokovic, Halep and Lowry and every other sportsperson in the world should be trading in the tools of their trade for gaming consoles and headsets?
It seems unlikely.
Like Giersdorf, professional athletes have spent countless hours honing their skills and they are hardly going to throw that all away while the arena in which they excel is still thriving.
And here on The Value Perspective, we very much feel that way about world stockmarkets where, despite many investors tripping over themselves to back perceived disruptors regardless of valuation or profits, we will continued to follow a process for which there is now approaching a century and a half of historical data to show buying good businesses for less than their intrinsic value will, on average and over time, yield above-average returns.
Fund Manager, Equity Value
I joined Schroders in 2000 as an equity analyst with a focus on construction and building materials. In 2006, Nick Kirrage and I took over management of a fund that seeks to identify and exploit deeply out of favour investment opportunities. In 2010, Nick and I also took over management of the team's flagship UK value fund seeking to offer income and capital growth.
The views and opinions displayed are those of Nick Kirrage, Andrew Lyddon, Kevin Murphy, Andrew Williams, Andrew Evans, Simon Adler, Juan Torres Rodriguez, Liam Nunn, Vera German and Roberta Barr, members of the Schroder Global Value Equity Team (the Value Perspective Team), and other independent commentators where stated.
They do not necessarily represent views expressed or reflected in other Schroders' communications, strategies or funds. The Team has expressed its own views and opinions on this website and these may change.
This article is intended to be for information purposes only and it is not intended as promotional material in any respect. Reliance should not be placed on the views and information on the website when taking individual investment and/or strategic decisions. Nothing in this article should be construed as advice. The sectors/securities shown above are for illustrative purposes only and are not to be considered a recommendation to buy/sell.
Past performance is not a guide to future performance and may not be repeated. The value of investments and the income from them may go down as well as up and investors may not get back the amounts originally invested.