Why we have no view on the result of the June general election or any other


Andrew Evans

Andrew Evans

Fund Manager, Equity Value

You might as well ignore anything any pundit has to say on the outcome of the June election – as we also wrote ahead of the 2015 election and last year’s EU referendum


“Do you, as professional investors, have a view on the upcoming general election?” Over the coming weeks, it is a line we expect to be hearing with some frequency, here on The Value Perspective – though not, we fondly imagine, from any regular visitors to the site. They, we like to think, already know the answer to that question, which is … the only view we have on the upcoming general election, is we have no view.

Regular visitors might know this, for example, because they read our article Polls apart a little more than two years ago. Having raised the possibility people might already be “feeling jaded by the constant procession of so-called experts speculating on who will and will not win the upcoming general election”, it asserted: “You might as well ignore anything any pundit has to say on the outcome.”

Or else they might know this because they read our article Poll fault a little less than two years ago. Here, with barely a hint of a gloat, we observed: “We may have got our pre-election anti-forecast right but that does not mean we will be getting cocky. We are well aware that, just as we ourselves did not know how the election would turn out last week, we cannot know what will happen next week.”

The confidence with which we expressed our view that, on matters such as forecasting election results, we should have no view had twin foundations – our well-documented suspicion of forecasts and those who earn a living from making them and our even more frequently expressed faith in value investing and its long-run ability, among other things, to turn bad headlines into good investments.

“By focusing on the long term, we avoid buying into any prevailing opinions or other ‘noise’ that could influence portfolio decisions,” is how we concluded Poll fault – and may as well do so again here. “We are mindful of their possible impact but can point to more than 100 years of history that shows an unemotional, valuation-based approach to investing should deliver over the long run – regardless of anything economic, political or any other forecasters might have to say.”


Andrew Evans

Andrew Evans

Fund Manager, Equity Value

I joined Schroders in 2015 as a member of the Value Investment team. Prior to joining Schroders I was responsible for the UK research process at Threadneedle. I began my investment career in 2001 at Dresdner Kleinwort as a Pan-European transport analyst. 

Important Information:

The views and opinions displayed are those of Ian Kelly, Nick Kirrage, Andrew Lyddon, Kevin Murphy, Andrew Williams, Andrew Evans and Simon Adler, members of the Schroder Global Value Equity Team (the Value Perspective Team), and other independent commentators where stated. They do not necessarily represent views expressed or reflected in other Schroders' communications, strategies or funds. The Team has expressed its own views and opinions on this website and these may change.

This article is intended to be for information purposes only and it is not intended as promotional material in any respect. Reliance should not be placed on the views and information on the website when taking individual investment and/or strategic decisions. Nothing in this article should be construed as advice. The sectors/securities shown above are for illustrative purposes only and are not to be considered a recommendation to buy/sell.

Past performance is not a guide to future performance and may not be repeated. The value of investments and the income from them may go down as well as up and investors may not get back the amounts originally invested.