Active ownership case study: Volkswagen
Active ownership case study: Volkswagen
Schroders co-filed a shareholder resolution in April urging the German carmaker to explain how its lobbying activities help to address climate risks.
What were investors calling for?
The group of investors tabled an amendment to VW’s Articles of Association, the agreed written rules about the running of a company. This was intended to ensure that future sustainability reporting includes an assessment of its lobbying’s impact and alignment with its climate goals.
In February 2022 a group of shareholders had presented VW with a draft amendment to their Articles of Association as a means of embedding a commitment to annual disclosure on their climate policy engagement and governance into their sustainability reporting cycle. VW had verbally declined to do so.
Who led the shareholder resolution?
The filing was led by Sweden’s pensions giant AP7 and the Church of England Pensions Board and advised by the international law firm Hausfeld.
It followed more than three years of shareholder dialogue with VW which have not yielded any significant improvement in the company’s position.
Who else supported it?
The filing group included Swedish pension funds AP2, AP3 and AP4 as well as Denmark’s AkademikerPension. The shareholders’ escalation ahead of VW’s AGM on Thursday 12 May was also supported by Climate Action 100+ engagement lead EOS stewardship services at Federated Hermes.
CA 100+ is an investor-led initiative to ensure the world’s largest corporate greenhouse gas emitters take necessary action on climate change.
What’s the issue?
VW does disclose its trade association memberships, however the company lacks a comprehensive disclosure of how those associations’ lobbying goals and activities align with its own climate goals.
It is felt that without that assessment VW risks impeding progress on its climate transition strategy and reputational damage. By embedding this commitment within its Articles of Association it could position itself as a true leader on the path to a low-carbon transition.
It has been assessed positively on only one of six sub-indicators under section seven of the Climate Action 100+ Net Zero Benchmark 2022, “Climate policy engagement”. The one it does address (7.2b) relates only to disclosure of memberships.
VW rejected the shareholder proposal, which means it will not appear on the ballot at its AGM on Thursday 12 May.
This is the second shareholder proposal on climate lobbying that has been put to VW, with the first being rejected in 2019.
The company rejected the latest shareholder proposal on the basis that they deem it beyond the competence of the general meeting: “The Board of Management alone is responsible for deciding on the content of the non-financial report in accordance with the interests of the company.”
The continued rejection of the investor request is in contrast to many of its peers including Mercedez-Benz and BMW, which have both made recent public commitments to include a review of climate lobbying policies and positions as part of their annual disclosures.
What next and what do our experts say?
The Church of England Pensions Board has said it will vote against two management proposals on the grounds of a lack of governance oversight on net zero aligned lobbying disclosure: The approval of the Board of Management and Supervisory Board’s actions in 2021 (agenda items 3 and 4).
Mark Lacey, Head of Global Resource Equities and Fund Manager, and Carol Storey, Active Ownership Manager, have said:
“We are disappointed that a company leading on so many areas of the low-carbon transition has fallen behind on climate lobbying disclosures. Our decision to co-file reflected our belief that looking at the details of the transition matters. In the last few years, we recognise that Volkswagen has significantly improved its leadership capability on this particular issue, and demonstrated how it is lobbying responsibly in support of ambitious climate policy.”
The views and opinions contained herein are those of Schroders’ investment teams and/or Economics Group, and do not necessarily represent Schroder Investment Management North America Inc.’s house views. These views are subject to change. This information is intended to be for information purposes only and it is not intended as promotional material in any respect.