Is China’s currency weakness the latest salvo in trade tensions?

Quickview: Craig Botham questions whether China’s currency is being used as a weapon in trade tensions.



Craig Botham
Senior Emerging Markets Economist

China’s currency, the yuan (CNY), has weakened 4-5% relative to the US dollar since June. This has prompted a lot of speculation that the authorities are deliberately weakening the currency in response to tariffs, and that this could mark the beginning of a series of devaluations for China. These fears are vastly overblown.

Official policy targets a basket of currencies, not a peg versus the US dollar

The first error made in this analysis is the assumption that China targets a peg versus the dollar. It does not. Official policy is to target a basket of currencies (essentially trade weighted) known as the CFETS basket. On this measure, the Chinese currency is only 2.5% weaker since June. 

Not only that, but as is visible from the chart below, this weakness is only reversing the strength seen this year. Since the CFETS basket was established in 2015, it has spent most of its time around the 94 mark. The deviation from currency policy has not happened in the last month and a half, it was the January - June period. 

CNYUSD vs CFETS basket


Recent CNY weakness a reversion to norm

So in a way, the press and other breathless analysts are right - trade tensions have been dictating Chinese FX policy. Just not in the way that garners headlines. Recent weakness is a reversion to the norm after a period in which the authorities deliberately allowed currency strength, presumably to avoid antagonising the US further at a delicate moment in negotiations. 

…but the currency could still be used to counter the effect of trade tariffs

We would not rule out the use of the currency as a weapon in the trade wars to come, but it remains under tarpaulin in the armoury for now. Should the CFETS pass through the 92 level, there will be more of a case to be made that China is aiming for currency weakness to counter US tariffs.

Important information: The views and opinions contained herein are those of the author(s) on this page, and may not necessarily represent views expressed or reflected in other Schroders communications, strategies or funds. This article is intended to be for information purposes only and it is not intended as promotional material in any respect. The material is not intended as an offer or solicitation for the purchase or sale of any financial instrument. The material is not intended to provide, and should not be relied on for, accounting, legal or tax advice, or investment recommendations. Information herein is believed to be reliable but Schroders does not warrant its completeness or accuracy. No responsibility can be accepted for errors of fact or opinion. Reliance should not be placed on the views and information in the document when taking individual investment and/or strategic decisions. Past performance is not a reliable indicator of future results, prices of shares and the income from them may fall as well as rise and investors may not get back the amount originally invested. Issued by Schroder Investment Management Limited, 31 Gresham Street, London EC2V 7QA, which is authorised and regulated by the Financial Conduct Authority. For your security, communications may be taped or monitored.


Craig Botham
Senior Emerging Markets Economist


Follow us

Schroder International Selection Fund is referred to as Schroder ISF throughout this website.

For illustrative purposes only and does not constitute a recommendation to invest in the above-mentioned security / sector / country.

Schroder Investment Management (Europe) S.A. is subject to the UCITS law of 17 December 2010 and the AIFM law of 12 July 2013.