PERSPECTIVE3-5 min to read

Outlook 2020: Global bonds

Could US dollar weakness grease the wheels of global growth in 2020?



Bob Jolly
Head of Global Macro
  • Amid a number of red signals for the economy and with central banks having largely exhausted their policy options, can anything sustain economic activity?
  • Fiscal stimulus, be it tax cuts or infrastructure spending, is likely, but will occur unevenly across the world, we think the UK has scope to move ahead of others
  • We see a weakening in the already rich US dollar as most likely to boost growth, underpinned by a continually accommodative stance from the Federal Reserve

Bond investors as a group are probably best described as more “glass half empty” than half full. Bull markets in bonds are usually associated with economic or geopolitical troubles somewhere in the world. Yields fall in anticipation of the troubles being severe enough to warrant interest rate cuts, cheering holders of bonds, since bond prices rise as interest rates and yields fall.

However, despite 2019 seeing a continuation of falling bond yields, the world according to equity and corporate bond (or credit) investors was in relatively rude health. Equity markets rallied strongly, and credit spreads (yields on corporate bonds relative to lower risk government bonds) compressed to near their historically tightest levels.

So if investors in these riskier assets were sufficiently cheerful to chase prices higher, why did bond yields continue falling?

All three of the following factors could be cited to explain the decline in bond yields in 2019, but only one can explain the resilience of risk assets:

  1. Ongoing uncertainty over US-China trade – clearly suppressing global manufacturing confidence and investment
  2. A lack of inflation
  3. Despite near or record low levels of unemployment, central banks falling over one another to add fuel to the fire via lower interest rates and keep the economic expansion going

All other things remaining equal, trade uncertainty should reduce investor appetite for riskier assets like stocks. Low inflation is arguably good for some, but not all risk assets. Only ever-lower interest rates really explain why both bonds and risky assets had such an enjoyable year.

However, a growing list of central bankers have suggested the elixir of interest rate cuts and in many places, the pursuit of unconventional policies such as quantitative easing (QE) is largely exhausted. Concerns are growing over an increasingly long list of late cycle indicators flashing amber and in certain cases red.

One example is US consumers view of current and future economic conditions, as shown in the chart below. The chart shows US consumers’ expectations for economic conditions, including employment and income prospects, minus their assessment of the present situation. As the chart demonstrates, when this measure declines significantly, a recession (when the economy contracts) tends to follow soon after.


Is recession inevitable or is there something which could keep the gravy train of economic expansion rolling and continue to confound the bears?

There appears to be two likely sources which could maintain economic confidence: fiscal policy and the US dollar.

Historically, easing fiscal policy, especially spending money on infrastructure, has acted as a positive catalyst for growth. Governments could use supercheap funding to invest in infrastructure with the expectation of boosting demand and ultimately productivity.

Fiscal easing: who will blink first?

The UK appears as one of the most obvious candidates for fiscal stimulus. It has the capacity to give itself a significant shot in the economic arm, while the country’s politicians appear to have the will to do so. By contrast, most other leading political parties around the world seem less willing to be proactive.

Germany, with plenty of capacity to spend and near record low bond yields, seems another obvious candidate. But at present the government seems unwilling to loosen the purse strings. This is largely because unemployment is so low and economic conditions, in the ruling coalition’s eyes, do not seem dire enough to warrant breaching their self-imposed fiscal discipline.

The US is approaching a presidential election, where it seems unlikely Donald Trump will be able to force any new fiscal boost through the Democrat-led House of Representatives. Japan may attempt to negate the impact of rising consumption taxes, but again seems unlikely to unleash the sort of fiscal bazooka required to stimulate activity.

Weaker dollar to the rescue?

Suggesting a weaker US dollar as a means of stimulating economic activity may not be immediately obvious. In most cases of currency devaluation, the devaluing country will feel the benefit from more competitive exports, but at the expense of its trading partners. The US dollar is an exception to this rule.

Many commodities are priced in US dollars. A lower dollar will result in higher commodity prices, which is helpful to commodity producers and exporters, and can more broadly stimulate growth and inflation.

Many emerging markets issue considerable amounts of debt denominated in US dollars. Dollar strength pushes up the cost of this debt. The corresponding weakness of emerging market currencies makes it more expensive for emerging countries to buy the US dollars they need to meet bond repayments. The local currency weakness relative to the US dollar will also restrict the ability of emerging countries to ease monetary policy, typically by cutting interest rates, as this can lead to higher inflation.

However, US dollar strength is most problematic when seen through the lens of global trade. Around 80% of the financing used for international trade is denominated in US dollars[1]. When the dollar is weak lending is easier and rises more quickly, facilitating trade, but when the dollar is strong lending and trade either grow more slowly or actually contract.

The US economy has been more resilient than the rest of the world over the past year or so, largely because trade and especially, net exports, represent a relatively small part of its economy. However, evidence is building to suggest the US is not immune to external developments. It looks increasingly likely that the US economy will slow, probably leading to more aggressive easing from the Federal Reserve (Fed), and in turn weakening the dollar. Should the US cut rates further, the interest return on certain assets, bonds in particular, will fall. This will make them less attractive to foreign investors resulting in lower demand for US dollars. 

A weak dollar, could indeed grease the wheels of global trade and by extension give the world a significant growth boost.

Without US dollar weakness and a corresponding pick up in growth as outlined above, it seems probable that the global consumer, arguably the last bastion of economic demand, will slow their purchases. Companies will have to consider reducing their cost base, which means reductions to the workforce and rising unemployment. The chart below, another red signal in our view, indicates that confidence among chief executives has already fallen to levels historically consistent with worsening employment conditions.


Should such circumstances transpire, the Fed would cut interest rates and the last two sources of US dollar support, the US’s relatively high level of growth and interest rates would be no more. It therefore seems probable we are in the latter stages of the US dollar bull run. Given the richness of the US dollar as well, it seems reasonable to start positioning for a reversal. 

  • You can read and watch more from our 2020 outlook series here

Risk associated with bond investing

A rise in interest rates generally causes bond prices to fall.

A decline in the financial health of an issuer could cause the value of its bonds to fall or become worthless.

The value of investments and the income from them may go down as well as up and investors may not get back the amounts originally invested.

[1] Source: Bank for International Settlements, 20 November 2019

Schroder Investment Management Limited - Dubai Branch is a DIFC Foreign Recognised Company. The DIFC Branch is duly authorized and regulated by the Dubai Financial Services Authority. The content of this material is not intended nor is it to be considered as financial advice and is only for the purpose of knowledge. This material has not been approved by any regulator/authority in the Middle East region. Accordingly, no regulator/authority has approved this information material or any other associated documents nor taken any steps to verify the information set out in this material and has no responsibility for it.


We have made every effort to ensure the accuracy of the information in this document. However, we cannot be held responsible for any errors, mistakes, or omissions, or for any actions taken based on this information. If you do not fully comprehend the content of this document, we recommend seeking advice from an authorized financial advisor.

This research and the information contained herein may not be reproduced, distributed, or transmitted in DIFC or in any other jurisdiction to any other person or incorporated in any way into another document or other material without our prior written consent.


Bob Jolly
Head of Global Macro


Follow us

Issued by Schroder Investment Management Limited. Authorised and regulated by the Financial Conduct Authority.

For illustrative purposes only and does not constitute a recommendation to invest in the above-mentioned security / sector / country.

© Copyright 2018  Schroder Investment Management (Europe) S.A. All rights in all countries.

Schroder Investment Management Limited – (Dubai Branch) is regulated by the Dubai Financial Services Authority (“DFSA”)