Can commodities survive a stronger US dollar?
25 March 2015
The latest insight from our multi-asset team focuses on the relationship between the greenback and commodity prices.
Conventional wisdom is that the US dollar has a strong influence on commodity prices. The explanation for this relationship is that since commodities are priced in dollar terms, then commodity prices must move lower when the dollar strengthens to reflect its increased purchasing power.
After the 2008 global financial crisis there has indeed been a very strong inverse relationship between commodities and the US dollar, as shown by the correlation chart in Figure 1 below.
Figure 1: Rolling 3 year correlation between Broad Commodity Index and USD Index monthly returns
Source: Schroders, Bloomberg, 10 March 2015
However, this has not always been the case. Prior to the financial crisis, the correlation was much less obvious. For example, during the boom years of the 1990s there was almost no relationship between the US dollar and commodity prices. Then, in the recovery after the dotcom bubble bursting from 2003-2006, the relationship weakened again.
We therefore reject the gross simplification that all you need to know to have a view on commodities is the direction of the dollar. It does, however, help if you can identify which type of dollar environment you are in.
Looking at the period from 1990 to 2015, 61% of the time there was a negative correlation between US dollar and commodities, and 39% a positive correlation. This 39% can be further subdivided into 23% for both commodities and US dollar rising, and 16% both US dollar and commodities falling. Figure 2 highlights in green those periods where we have both rising US dollar and commodities; the periods of both falling are highlighted in red.
Figure 2: Broad Commodity Index and correlation regimes
Source: Schroders, Bloomberg, 10 March 2015
Generally speaking, during Federal Reserve rate-hiking cycles we see a positive correlation regime where both the dollar and commodities rose together. The greatest concentration of green observations occurs in these periods: June 1996 – March 1997, March 1999 – January 2000 and June 2003 – December 2005. These were periods of both rising interest rates and stronger growth.
We are approaching a tightening cycle in the US and this is likely to result in a continued strengthening of the dollar. If this is associated with continued positive economic growth then both the US dollar and commodities can go up. In the event that tightening is a policy mistake, or it exerts so much pressure on emerging market economies that we enter an emerging market crisis phase (slowing growth and exacerbating the demand for the US dollar) then commodities are likely to suffer.
- Alastair Baker
- Patrick Brenner
- Foreign Exchange
Important Information: The views and opinions contained herein are those of Schroders’ Investment team, and may not necessarily represent views expressed or reflected in other Schroders communications, strategies or funds. This material is intended to be for information purposes only and is not intended as promotional material in any respect. The material is not intended as an offer or solicitation for the purchase or sale of any financial instrument. It is not intended to provide and should not be relied on for accounting, legal or tax advice, or investment recommendations. Reliance should not be placed on the views and information in this document when taking individual investment and/or strategic decisions. Past performance is not a reliable indicator of future results. The value of an investment can go down as well as up and is not guaranteed. All investments involve risks including the risk of possible loss of principal. Information herein is believed to be reliable but Schroders does not warrant its completeness or accuracy. Some information quoted was obtained from external sources we consider to be reliable. No responsibility can be accepted for errors of fact obtained from third parties, and this data may change with market conditions. This does not exclude any duty or liability that Schroders has to its customers under any regulatory system. Regions/ sectors shown for illustrative purposes only and should not be viewed as a recommendation to buy/sell. The opinions in this material include some forecasted views. We believe we are basing our expectations and beliefs on reasonable assumptions within the bounds of what we currently know. However, there is no guarantee than any forecasts or opinions will be realised. These views and opinions may change. UK: Schroder Investment Management Limited, 31 Gresham Street, London, EC2V 7QA, is authorised and regulated by the Financial Conduct Authority. For your security, communications may be taped or monitored. Further information about Schroders can be found at www.schroders.com US: Schroder Investment Management North America Inc. is an indirect wholly owned subsidiary of Schroders plc, a SEC registered investment adviser and is registered in Canada in the capacity of Portfolio Manager with the Securities Commission in Alberta, British Columbia, Manitoba, Nova Scotia, Ontario, Quebec and Saskatchewan providing asset management products and services to clients in Canada. 875 Third Avenue, New York, NY, 10022, (212) 641-3800. www.schroders.com/us