Is the US economy heading for recession?
Ahead of the release of US first quarter GDP growth, we examine whether the weak growth that is widely expected is a signal of an impending recession or whether it is a mere seasonal blip.
28 April 2016
With the Federal Reserve Bank of Atlanta’s GDPNow model pointing to growth of just 0.6% saar* for Q1 2016, the US economy looks set to have experienced yet another poor first quarter.
Historical comparisons, however, suggest that we need to be mindful that this could be a quirk of the seasonal adjustment process rather than a sign of an imminent recession.
How does Q1 2016 compare to previous years?
The tendency of late for Q1 economic growth to be weaker on average than the following quarters has been blamed on several factors, including abnormally poor weather and West Coast port strikes, for example.
However, while these factors surely had some influence on the US economy at the time, it is apparent that over a longer-term horizon, the same trend of a weak first quarter plays out, as can be seen in Chart 1 below.
Between 1986 and 2015, real GDP growth for Q1 averaged 1.78% compared to 2.86% across Q2, Q3 and Q4.
Figure 1: Average quarter-on-quarter US real GDP growth rate (saar)
Source: Thomson Datastream, Schroders Economics Group. Updated 18/04/2016
Is seasonal adjustment adversely impacting Q1?
While the Bureau for Economic Analysis (BEA) conducts its own seasonal adjustment to real GDP, the noticeable difference in the average growth rate in Q1 compared to the following quarters suggests there is a degree of additional seasonality in the official data, known as residual seasonality.
After all, first quarter seasonally adjusted real GDP growth should not be consistently higher or lower than growth in any other quarter. However, applying a second round seasonal adjustment to real GDP enables us to adjust for this potential residual seasonality.
Chart 2 below displays the difference between the original series and the seasonally adjusted original series over the last 30 years.
Figure 2: Residual seasonality of US real GDP growth (official series - seasonally adjusted official series)
Source: Thomson Datastream. Schroders Economics Group. Updated 18/04/2016
The data show that the growth rate for the first quarter of the year is often higher once the additional seasonal adjustment is made, with an average positive adjustment of 0.84 percentage points since 1986.
Conversely, real GDP growth in Q2, Q3 and Q4 is often lower after attempting to remove the residual seasonality.
No looming recession
Despite the likelihood that extreme weather has weighed on Q1 US GDP in recent years, this analysis and historical data would suggest the seasonal adjustment made by the BEA is having an excessive dampening effect on reported first quarter growth.
Should US real GDP growth turn out to be weak in the first quarter of 2016 as widely expected, this should not be interpreted as a sign that a recession is on the cards.
It is more likely to be a peculiarity of the seasonal adjustment process than anything more fundamental.
* Seasonally adjusted annual rate - A rate that is adjusted to take into account fluctuations of values in the data which might occur due to seasonality.
** Residual seasonality - the manifestation of seasonal patterns in data that have already been seasonally adjusted.
- Federal Reserve
- Marcus Jennings
Important Information: The views and opinions contained herein are those of Schroders’ Investment team, and may not necessarily represent views expressed or reflected in other Schroders communications, strategies or funds. This material is intended to be for information purposes only and is not intended as promotional material in any respect. The material is not intended as an offer or solicitation for the purchase or sale of any financial instrument. It is not intended to provide and should not be relied on for accounting, legal or tax advice, or investment recommendations. Reliance should not be placed on the views and information in this document when taking individual investment and/or strategic decisions. Past performance is not a reliable indicator of future results. The value of an investment can go down as well as up and is not guaranteed. All investments involve risks including the risk of possible loss of principal. Information herein is believed to be reliable but Schroders does not warrant its completeness or accuracy. Some information quoted was obtained from external sources we consider to be reliable. No responsibility can be accepted for errors of fact obtained from third parties, and this data may change with market conditions. This does not exclude any duty or liability that Schroders has to its customers under any regulatory system. Regions/ sectors shown for illustrative purposes only and should not be viewed as a recommendation to buy/sell. The opinions in this material include some forecasted views. We believe we are basing our expectations and beliefs on reasonable assumptions within the bounds of what we currently know. However, there is no guarantee than any forecasts or opinions will be realised. These views and opinions may change. UK: Schroder Investment Management Limited, 31 Gresham Street, London, EC2V 7QA, is authorised and regulated by the Financial Conduct Authority. For your security, communications may be taped or monitored. Further information about Schroders can be found at www.schroders.com US: Schroder Investment Management North America Inc. is an indirect wholly owned subsidiary of Schroders plc, a SEC registered investment adviser and is registered in Canada in the capacity of Portfolio Manager with the Securities Commission in Alberta, British Columbia, Manitoba, Nova Scotia, Ontario, Quebec and Saskatchewan providing asset management products and services to clients in Canada. 875 Third Avenue, New York, NY, 10022, (212) 641-3800. www.schroders.com/us