Blog

Amazon: Is this the end for ‘old-school’ retailers?

This summer the financial press has been full of stories about the ‘Amazon’ effect but has the e-commerce giant’s global dominance really brought an end to retailing as we know it?

17/08/2017

Juan Torres Rodriguez

Juan Torres Rodriguez

Research Analyst, Equity Value

If you are a regular reader of the financial press, you could be forgiven for thinking some kind of corporate serial killer is currently on the loose.

On an almost daily basis, fresh obituaries appear for retail businesses and there is a strong consensus on who is to blame – the global phenomenon that is Amazon as it makes good on one of founder Jeff Bezos’s favourite aphorisms:

Your margin is my opportunity.

Case closed, then? Well, not so fast.

Here on The Value Perspective, we do not believe things are ever so black-and-white – and we are always suspicious of consensus.

So we thought we would take a closer look at the so-called ‘Amazon effect’ (™ all major media outlets) – specifically, is Amazon really sounding the death knell for retail investing and, either way, what are the implications and opportunities for investors?

Amazon’s domination

There is little doubt Amazon’s rapid online growth is asking some very tough questions of traditional ‘bricks and mortar’ retailers and their old-school business models, which is leading to stiff declines in like-for-like sales numbers.

Furthermore, Amazon keeps pushing into fresh markets – its new focus on the home, kitchen and furniture space, for example  presumably leaving Ikea relieved it is not a listed company.

Still, while you could certainly make the case there has been a shift in the way consumers do their shopping, it would be pushing it to argue people have abandoned physical stores for good.

After all, what does it say that June saw Amazon itself shelling out $13.7bn (£10.5bn) on Whole Foods – a food retailer with a significant bricks-and-mortar presence – or that it is now opening physical bookstores around the US?

Draining away customers from retailers

At its core, Amazon represents such a huge threat to other businesses because it drains away potential customers.

As a result, even the largest and most powerful retailers no longer have control over brand perception, lose pricing power and see their margin and returns eroded.

Tellingly June also saw Nike – which for years had resisted partnering with Amazon – announcing details of a limited working relationship.

 

GET A WEEKLY ROUND UP OF THE BEST VALUE PERSPECTIVE POSTS

 

Across the globe, companies have been slow off the mark – first in spotting the significance of the online trend and then in reacting and investing in their own online offering.

Thus, over the last couple of years – and most notably in the fashion sector – an increasing number of retailers have been going bankrupt.

As investors, it is hard to tell whether even those with strong margins and high returns will exist a few years from now.

Not all Amazon’s fault

Easy as it may be to pin all of retail’s woes on Amazon, however, it is also wrong.

As Vitaliy Katsenelson argues in his excellent article It’s not just Amazon's fault, the group accounts for just 1.5% of total US retail sales.

More important factors behind weak retail sales, he suggests, include significant changes in consumers’ needs and preferences and the simple but by no means new argument the US is ‘over-retailed’.

At this point it may be instructive to introduce the example of South Africa, where the idea of ‘e-retailing’ is still in its infancy.

According to analysts at Morgan Stanley, Amazon has no infrastructure in the country as yet and has secured just 1.7% of the overall online market compared with 15% for bricks-and-mortar retailers.

Yet, interestingly, retail space has increased 32% over the past five years while GDP per capita is only up 8%.

Nor are all retailers giving up without a fight in Amazon’s more established heartlands.

Those that appear well-placed to push back include Wal-Mart, which has not only been investing heavily in e-commerce but also enjoys an advantage on grocery sales thanks to its massive scale and price investments in recent years.

For its part, Ulta Beauty offers in-store services, enticing customers to visit to have their make-up done.

Reinvention can work

One unlikely example of a business that has managed to reinvent itself for this new retail environment is US electronics giant Best Buy, whose prospects the market had written off some years back.

After announcing it would match the prices of its online competitors and renting out parts of its enormous stores to major brands, such as Microsoft and Samsung, it has enjoyed increased sales growth in successive quarters.

So, while the retail sector hardly has cause for complacency, reports of its death at the hands of Amazon would – as things stand – appear to have been exaggerated.

That being so, the important question for us here on The Value Perspective –  and one we will address in our next article – is, is it still possible for investors to find value in retail stocks?

Author

Juan Torres Rodriguez

Juan Torres Rodriguez

Research Analyst, Equity Value

I joined Schroders in January 2017 as a member of the Global Value Investment team. Prior to joining Schroders I worked for the Global Emerging Markets value and income funds at Pictet Asset Management with responsibility over different sectors, among those Consumer, Telecoms and Utilities. Before joining Pictet I was a member of the Customs Solution Group at HOLT Credit Suisse.  

Don’t miss the latest value investing ideas.

Enter your email for alerts on new posts from The Value Perspective team.

We store your information securely, and we never share it with third parties. We'll only send you emails relevant to you and you can opt out at any time.

Important Information:

The views and opinions displayed are those of Ian Kelly, Nick Kirrage, Andrew Lyddon, Kevin Murphy, Andrew Williams, Andrew Evans and Simon Adler, members of the Schroder Global Value Equity Team (the Value Perspective Team), and other independent commentators where stated. They do not necessarily represent views expressed or reflected in other Schroders' communications, strategies or funds. The Team has expressed its own views and opinions on this website and these may change.

This article is intended to be for information purposes only and it is not intended as promotional material in any respect. Reliance should not be placed on the views and information on the website when taking individual investment and/or strategic decisions. Nothing in this article should be construed as advice. The sectors/securities shown above are for illustrative purposes only and are not to be considered a recommendation to buy/sell.

Past performance is not a guide to future performance and may not be repeated. The value of investments and the income from them may go down as well as up and investors may not get back the amounts originally invested.