Blog

‘More expensive’ does not mean ‘more safe’ – for drivers or for investors

01/06/2017

Simon Adler

Simon Adler

Fund Manager, Equity Value

With cars, as with investing, paying more does not necessarily mean you will end up enjoying a safer journey

Here’s a quick multiple-choice question: What single quality do you look for most in a new car?

A) Top-of-the-range sound-system.

B) The ability to accelerate from 0 to 60mph is under five seconds.

C) Cup-holders for all passengers.

D) The reassurance that you and your passengers have a better than average chance of reaching your destination in one piece.

OK – it is a somewhat facetious question and, here on The Value Perspective, we would of course presume your answer, like ours, would be the last one. And yet we raise the point because of two recent reviews of car safety – The UK’s safest cars on Carbuyer.co.uk and CBS News’s Top Safety Pick Plus vehicles – which caused us to wonder about the priorities of some drivers.

Take a look at that first list and, among the 10 cars assessed as the safest over the course of 2016, you will see only one that really counts as a luxury car – the Mercedes E-Class saloon. In the second list, meanwhile, which highlights the 48 cars that earned the stringent Top Safety Pick Plus rating last year, there are just five high-end models – three kinds of Audi, the BMW 2 series and, again, the Merc E.

In other words, then, it does not immediately follow that, just because you pay more, you will end up with a safer car. Sure, you may well enjoy the fantastic sound-system and the theoretical prospect of going from 0 to 60mph faster than you will ever realistically need to and maybe even a cup-holder for the family dog but your extra expenditure appears unlikely to have made your journey any safer.

Exciting-sounding business may sound good, but...

And that line of thinking of naturally led us to think about the stockmarket and how many investors are very happy to shell out for exciting-sounding businesses that sound great in dinner-party conversations. At the same time, however, these investors would appear to have very little notion of the sort of risks they might be running and equally little idea of how they could introduce a greater margin of safety into their portfolios.

It is entirely possible of course that, for the prices they are paying, drivers of top-of-the-range cars assume top-of-the-range safety comes as standard but assumptions here, as in investing, can be dangerous. Here on The Value Perspective, we reject all ‘luxury-brand’ thinking, preferring instead to conduct our own in-depth research and buy unloved businesses that, while sparking little interest at dinner parties, are cheap and thus offer an inbuilt margin of safety should they run into trouble at some point down the road.

 

Author

Simon Adler

Simon Adler

Fund Manager, Equity Value

I joined Schroders in 2008 as an analyst in the UK equity team, ultimately analysing the Media, Transport, Leisure, Chemicals and Utility sectors. In 2014 I moved into a fund management role and have had experience managing Global ESG and Pan-European funds.  I joined the Value investment team in July 2016 to focus on UK institutional and ethical-value portfolios.

Don’t miss the latest value investing ideas.

Enter your email for alerts on new posts from The Value Perspective team.

We store your information securely, and we never share it with third parties. We'll only send you emails relevant to you and you can opt out at any time.

Important Information:

The views and opinions displayed are those of Ian Kelly, Nick Kirrage, Andrew Lyddon, Kevin Murphy, Andrew Williams, Andrew Evans and Simon Adler, members of the Schroder Global Value Equity Team (the Value Perspective Team), and other independent commentators where stated. They do not necessarily represent views expressed or reflected in other Schroders' communications, strategies or funds. The Team has expressed its own views and opinions on this website and these may change.

This article is intended to be for information purposes only and it is not intended as promotional material in any respect. Reliance should not be placed on the views and information on the website when taking individual investment and/or strategic decisions. Nothing in this article should be construed as advice. The sectors/securities shown above are for illustrative purposes only and are not to be considered a recommendation to buy/sell.

Past performance is not a guide to future performance and may not be repeated. The value of investments and the income from them may go down as well as up and investors may not get back the amounts originally invested.