Oil companies - throwing cash into the wind?

Oil companies might seem an odd place to look for renewable energy investment, but oil majors are increasingly throwing their financial weight behind clean energy.



Global Climate Change Team

The trend of oil companies courting renewable energy technologies is spreading fast. Oil majors Statoil, Shell, Total and Exxon have all announced interests and projects in low-carbon technologies; from solar to wind to carbon capture storage.

In the past, oil company investment in renewable energies has been dismissed as just “lip service” from a carbon intensive industry. But one little understood implication of the trend is the scale of capital available for oil companies to redirect away from oil investments, should strategic intentions shift.

Hey, big spenders

Capital expended by major listed oil companies was in the region of $200 billion in 2017. It was around $400 billion in 20141. On the other hand, total clean energy investment in 2015 was estimated at $286 billion2. So when oil majors start redirecting capital towards renewables, the market should take notice. With strategic presentations increasingly highlighting the range of renewable energy investment plans, it appears oil majors are beginning to recognise the challenges posed by a more carbon-conscious world.

2016 saw activity really begin to take off. Total acquired SAFT for $1.1 billion. Statoil acquired a 50% stake in the Arkona offshore windfarm; a $1.4 billion total project cost. Exxon, meanwhile, has announced that it would be furthering its partnership with FuelCell Energy on CCS (carbon capture and storage) technology. Whilst investments to date are small relative to capital spend by oil majors, there is scope for sizeable increases. Statoil has indicated that it could spend 15-20% of capital expenditure on renewables in 2030.

Future proof?

The rationale for all this is obvious; policies that could be enacted to combat climate change pose direct risks to the demand for carbon-based products. This adds risks to the business models of oil majors.

Renewables also represent other benefits. Regarding project economics, renewables offer a very different cashflow profile, typically one of steady earnings power compared to cyclical earnings of oil investments. One could justifiably argue that there is merit in renewables as a means for risk mitigation, both against carbon policies but also to stabilise cyclical earnings.

Oil majors shifting capital spending from carbon-based resources to renewables could add significant levels of capital to the renewables industry. Indeed, the levels of investment could exceed expected levels of growth by market participants, leading to greater demand for projects and boosting revenues for companies exposed to renewable engineering.

1.Morgan Stanley, 17 February 2017

2. http://fs-unep-centre.org/publications/global-trends-renewable-energy-investment-2016

Important information

This communication is marketing material. The views and opinions contained herein are those of the author(s) on this page, and may not necessarily represent views expressed or reflected in other Schroders communications, strategies or funds. This material is intended to be for information purposes only and is not intended as promotional material in any respect. The material is not intended as an offer or solicitation for the purchase or sale of any financial instrument. It is not intended to provide and should not be relied on for accounting, legal or tax advice, or investment recommendations. Reliance should not be placed on the views and information in this document when taking individual investment and/or strategic decisions. Past performance is not a reliable indicator of future results. The value of an investment can go down as well as up and is not guaranteed. All investments involve risks including the risk of possible loss of principal. Information herein is believed to be reliable but Schroders does not warrant its completeness or accuracy. Some information quoted was obtained from external sources we consider to be reliable. No responsibility can be accepted for errors of fact obtained from third parties, and this data may change with market conditions. This does not exclude any duty or liability that Schroders has to its customers under any regulatory system. Regions/ sectors shown for illustrative purposes only and should not be viewed as a recommendation to buy/sell. The opinions in this material include some forecasted views. We believe we are basing our expectations and beliefs on reasonable assumptions within the bounds of what we currently know. However, there is no guarantee than any forecasts or opinions will be realised. These views and opinions may change. The content is issued by Schroder Investment Management Limited, 1 London Wall Place, London EC2Y 5AU. Registered No. 1893220 England. Authorised and regulated by the Financial Conduct Authority.


Global Climate Change Team