IN FOCUS6-8 min read

Deglobalisation: did Mexico just eat China’s lunch?

As trends identified in the “3D Reset” continue to build in the global economy, Mexico has overtaken China to become the number one exporter of goods to the US. We look at what this means for the Asian superpower.

Hero - China and Mexico


David Rees
Senior Emerging Markets Economist

In spite of depleted excess savings and much higher interest rates, US consumption has continued to tick along at decent rates of growth. And a period of real wage growth suggests the US consumer will keep the show on the road for a while longer.

As a result, we recently upgraded our forecast for the US economy, and the prospect for resilient consumption lends support to our view that restocking will support an upturn in the global goods cycle in the months ahead.

Too early to call regime shift in global supply chains

That should be good news for export-orientated emerging markets. And as we previously argued, a boost to manufactured exports is one potential bright spot in China’s beleaguered economy. However, it’s not guaranteed.

One push back to the view is that while US consumption has been robust, it has failed to spill over to China in the way it has in the past. Indeed, despite some recent improvement, US imports from China continued to contract by almost 25% year-on-year (y/y) in July.

US imports from China have collapsed

However, while US imports from China have collapsed, demand for goods from neighbouring Mexico has continued to grow year over year.

We have been arguing for some time that the growing wedge between the US and China, exacerbated by disruptions during the pandemic, meant that there was likely to be a shift in global supply chains.  

Indeed, deglobalisation is one of the pillars of what we’re calling the “3D Reset”, and the trend of nearshoring – as countries like the US bring supply chains closer to home, forms a key part of this.

That resilience in US demand for Mexican goods has seen Mexico overtake China for the first time since the early-2000s to become the number one exporter of goods to the US.

As of July, Mexico had a roughly 15% share of exports to the US, whereas China’s share had fallen to 14.6% from a peak of almost 22% in March 2018. Note that we use a 12-month rolling average of nominal US$ dollar exports in order to strip out seasonal effects.

Mexico now has bigger share of US market than China

Read more: Globalisation reset: which economies and markets stand to benefit?, or listen here

And that, while not as dynamic as it is in Asia, Mexican manufacturing and markets ought to benefit from any reshoring of production back towards the US (see links immediately above to written article and podcast covering our latest research on these trends).

But while it is tempting to conclude that we are already witnessing this regime shift in global supply chains, at least three factors suggest that China will still benefit from any upturn in the goods cycle in the months ahead.

Watch here: “Mexico everybody’s emerging markets darling”

Mexico - everybody's emerging markets darling

Ukraine war, Covid and tariffs have distorted the picture

First, while China has underperformed, it is worth noting that US nominal imports from Asia have been weak across the board over the past year. This in large part reflects price effects as the large swings in energy prices since Russia’s invasion of Ukraine wash out of the incoming economic data.

Just as falling energy components have contributed to the decline in global inflation in recent months, this has also dragged down nominal exports as fluctuations in producer prices and transport costs have been passed onto consumers. Indeed, it is notable that, despite being a net import of oil, China’s nominal export growth has historically moved in lockstep with changes in energy prices.

Looking through these price effects, it is worth noting that Asian exports have been growing in volume terms. By contrast, government-mandated price controls through state-owned energy companies meant that swings in energy costs were less violent in Mexico and that they are now having less of a dampening effect on nominal trade.

Price effects have weighed on nominal imports from Asia

Second, changes in the composition of US consumption have made it less import-intensive. Whereas in the initial phase of the pandemic and subsequent lockdowns concentrated demand into the goods sector, the reopening of the US economy released pent-up demand for services that rely far less on imported goods.

But while Mexican exporters also faced the same issues, they have benefitted from strong motor vehicle exports as dealers scramble to clear backlogs of orders from the post-pandemic era. Auto exports from Asia have also been faring well, notably China’s emergence as a key manufacturer of electric vehicles. But very little of those products are bound for the US market.

Booming Mexican car exports to the US

Third, and perhaps most importantly, it appears that Chinese firms are rerouting exports via third parties in order to circumvent tariffs and sanctions imposed by the US government in recent years.

It is always difficult to identify a single smoking gun when it comes to proving re-routing of trade. But a couple of things point that direction.

One is that while China’s share of bilateral trade with the US has fallen, its share of the global export market has not. Indeed, China’s share of global exports shot up during the pandemic and has remained elevated ever since.

There has been some diversification in Chinese trade, for example it has taken a far larger share of trade with Russia since its invasion of Ukraine. But the sheer difference in the size of consumption spending means that more exports to Russia cannot feasibly explain the fact that China has retained global market share even as exports to the US have sagged.

Chinese goods must still be finding their way to the US.

For a description of 3D Reset terms see: The 3D Reset: the economic terms you’ll need to know

China's share of global exports has not fallen

Another indication is that China’s exports to other countries in Asia and Mexico itself have increased markedly in recent years, just as US imports from those countries have also grown strongly. This is consistent with a re-routing of trade via third parties in order to rebadge shipments and avoid trade sanctions.

Indeed, it is notable that China’s trade balance with Mexico itself has risen by about 1% of GDP during the recent period of weak bilateral trade with the US.

China should still benefit from global upturn in goods trade

China is not safe from reshoring. The explosion in gross fixed capital investment in Mexico in recent months, which mirrors similarly strong investment in US manufacturing facilities, suggests that firms are starting to relocate.

Mexico investment spending on a tear

However, while Mexico stands to benefit from the new regime in global trade, reshoring will be a slow moving process that takes years rather than months. In the meantime, if we are right in expecting an upturn in the global goods cycle, that ought to be a positive catalyst for China’s economy and some of its markets – particularly the renminbi which has weakened sharply this year and is driven in large part by the export cycle.

While the authorities are currently busy trying to lean against depreciation pressures, announcing incremental measures aimed at supporting the currency around 7.20-7.30/$, we expect it to strengthen as exports pick up.

Subscribe to our Insights

Visit our preference center, where you can choose which Schroders Insights you would like to receive

The views and opinions contained herein are those of Schroders’ investment teams and/or Economics Group, and do not necessarily represent Schroder Investment Management North America Inc.’s house views. These views are subject to change. This information is intended to be for information purposes only and it is not intended as promotional material in any respect.


David Rees
Senior Emerging Markets Economist


Economic views
Global economy
3D Reset
Regime shift
Global value chains
David Rees
Follow us

Please consider a fund's investment objectives, risks, charges and expenses carefully before investing.

The website and the content included is intended for US-based financial intermediaries (and their non-US affiliates) on behalf of those of their clients who are both (a) not “US persons” as that term is defined in Rule 902 under the United States Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the “1933 Act”) and (b) “non-United States persons” as that terms is defined in Rule 4.7(a)(vi) under the Commodity Exchange Act of 1936, as amended. None of the funds described herein is registered as an “investment company” as that term is defined in the United States Investment Company Act of 1940, as amended, and shares of the funds described herein have not been and will not be registered under the 1933 Act or the securities laws of any of the states of the United States. The shares may not be offered, sold or delivered directly or indirectly in the United States or for the account or benefit of any “US person.”

The information contained in this website does not constitute an offer to purchase or sell, advertise, recommend, distribute or solicit a subscription for interests in investment products in any Latin American jurisdiction where such would be unauthorized. The information contained in this website is not intended for distribution to the public in general and must not be reproduced or distributed, entirely or partially to any individuals who are not allowed to receive it according to applicable legislation. The investment products and their distribution may not be registered in Latin America, and therefore may not meet certain requirements and procedures usually observed in public offerings of securities registered in the region, with which investors in the Latin America capital markets may be familiar. For this reason, the access of the investors to certain information regarding the investment products may be restricted. Financial intermediaries and Advisors must ensure the information provided in this website is appropriate and suitable to the receiver’s domicile and jurisdiction and according to the applicable legislation.

For illustrative purposes only and does not constitute a recommendation to invest in the above-mentioned security/sector/country.

Issued by Schroder Investment Management (Europe) S.A., 5 (“SIM Europe”), rue Höhenhof, L-1736 Senningerberg, Luxembourg. Registered No. B 37.799

Schroder Investment Management North America Inc. (“SIMNA”) is an SEC registered investment adviser, CRD Number 105820, providing asset management products and services to clients in the US and registered as a Portfolio Manager with the securities regulatory authorities in Canada.  Schroder Fund Advisors LLC (“SFA”) is a wholly-owned subsidiary of SIMNA Inc. and is registered as a limited purpose broker-dealer with FINRA and as an Exempt Market Dealer with the securities regulatory authorities in Canada.  SFA markets certain investment vehicles for which other Schroders entities are investment advisers.

Schroders Capital is the private markets investment division of Schroders plc.  Schroders Capital Management (US) Inc. (“Schroders Capital US”) is registered as an investment adviser with the US Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC).  It provides asset management products and services to clients in the United States and Canada.  For more information, visit

SIM (Europe), SIMNA, SFA and Schroders Capital are wholly owned subsidiaries of Schroders plc.