Deciphering liquidity: Understanding the mechanics of new funds investing in private markets.
As more private investors choose to allocate to private markets, we shed light on how the liquidity mechanisms of new fund structures work.
Autheurs
Private markets are inherently less liquid than public markets, and locking up funds for a significant period is unfamiliar to many private investors.
Additionally, regulators around the world are concerned about the potential risks associated with private assets during market stress. A key focus of regulators is on the liquidity mismatches that can arise if open-ended funds invest in illiquid investments and allow too much flexibility on redemptions.
But private asset managers are exploring ways to address this liquidity challenge, including evolving from fixed-term funds to more flexible indefinite-term funds, and introducing open-ended semi-liquid funds as well as offering new regulated structures.
Semi-liquid, or ‘evergreen’ funds
Semi-liquid funds, as the name suggests, offer a balance between liquidity and the potential for attractive returns by investing in a mix of liquid and illiquid assets.
While these funds do not require capital to be locked up, like closed-ended vehicles with fixed terms, redemption windows might still be infrequent and subject to limitations and are therefore most appropriate for investors with a longer-term time horizon. The options in the semi-liquid fund space are increasing with more providers coming to market with new vehicles offering a diverse range of strategies.
Within semi-liquid structures, investors can buy and sell at a prevailing Net Asset Value (NAV) as they are transacting with the manager of the fund (rather than other investors in a secondary market). This allows investors to deploy their capital immediately into a diversified private markets portfolio at the NAV of the fund at a given time, rather than waiting for their cash commitments to be drawn down over time.
Investing at a fund’s NAV reduces volatility or public market beta compared to daily traded listed closed-ended funds. This type of closed-ended fund relies on a secondary market for liquidity where the price investors receive is based on the prevailing market supply and demand dynamics.
However, this also means that liquidity in a semi-liquid fund is not as high as it is for listed closed-ended options. Semi-liquid funds typically deal less frequently (often monthly or quarterly), with prescribed notice periods and can “gate” when certain thresholds are breached, potentially limiting the amount which can be redeemed at a given dealing date.
In semi-liquid funds, a well-constructed portfolio, diversified by geography, sector, and asset type (and with a potential small allocation to liquid investments), can engineer a level of “natural liquidity” that is regular and consistent. Semi-liquid funds also employ liquidity management tools that can control liquidity within the fund, such as setting redemption limits and realising liquid investments (see below).
A clear assessment of a fund’s mechanics to provide liquidity is crucial to any wealth manager allocating client’s capital to this fund structure.
Long-Term Assets Fund (LTAF)
The LTAF is a UK authorised open-ended fund that invests in long-term illiquid assets while offering flexibility for investors to buy and sell.
To ensure investor protection, robust rules govern the LTAF. These rules outline possible liquidity mechanisms that can be used by the fund manager and limit the frequency of redemptions offered. They also establish a consistent relationship between the liquidity of the fund's assets and its redemption terms. This alignment ensures that investors are aware of the notice period required to redeem their investments and the liquidity of the underlying portfolio. Some liquidity rules for the LTAFs are pre-determined, which include restrictions on dealing frequency (no more than monthly) and a mandatory notice period of at least 90 days for redemptions.
Optionally, some LTAFs may have longer notice periods and less frequent dealing, depending on the fund manager's discretion. These terms must align with the fund's underlying liquidity profile.
Like other semi-liquid funds, an LTAF portfolio can generate natural liquidity through the yield or distributions from its underlying investments. These returns should closely match the expected level of investor redemptions in a stable market.
European Long-Term Investment Fund (ELTIF)
The purpose of the ELTIF, introduced in 2015, is to establish a consistent framework for long-term investments in private assets across EU member states and expand access to a broader range of clients, including individual investors. The ELTIF regime focused on channeling capital towards long-term investments in the real economy, primarily targeting long-term illiquid assets like private equity, real estate, and infrastructure.
While the industry supported the objectives of the new structure, certain investment and distribution restrictions posed challenges in practice. To address these issues, the EU conducted a review of the regulation and released an updated version, known as ELTIF 2.0 which took effect in January 2024.
Unlike the original regulation, which only allowed closed-ended funds, the new rules introduce the possibility of redemptions before the end of a fund's fixed term life, effectively turning the ELTIF into an open-ended semi-liquid fund.
The specific rules for redemptions will be clarified through a set of Regulatory Technical Standards that will be finalised by the European Securities and Markets Authority at the end of 2024.
This guidance will cover important aspects such as minimum holding periods, notice periods, criteria for determining maximum redemption percentages, anti-dilution mechanisms, and other liquidity management tools.
How does liquidity work?
For most semi-liquid funds as well as LTAFs, liquidity is managed in two ways:
Portfolio construction and risk mitigation
The portfolio must offer a prudent spread of risk to avoid concentration risk. For example, it might be exposed to a range of vintages to establish a baseline of natural liquidity through distributions. Geographic, asset class and/or sectoral diversification also reduces the risk of being exposed to shocks or events impacting the liquidity of the entire portfolio.
Some LTAFs and semi-liquid funds may invest a portion of their portfolio into more liquid assets, which can be sold more readily to meet redemptions at a given dealing date.
Another consideration for portfolio construction is the pace of deployment for new subscriptions and being able to accommodate changes in subscription activity. Typically, closed-end funds allow investors to make commitments which are called over a certain period.
However, semi-liquid funds as well as LTAFs are evergreen open-ended funds so subscriptions must be invested faster, and the volume of subscriptions might vary from one period to the next. This means that an investment manager must be confident that their investment platform is broad and deep enough to accommodate irregular inflows and invest quickly, whilst maintaining diversification.
In this structure, a cash balance or pool of liquid securities in the fund is actively managed by the investment manager. It is a function of the level of subscription and redemption activity, the pace of deployment and distributions from the underlying portfolio. Funds will maintain a cash balance to meet redemptions and avoid selling down any of the more long-term private markets assets for a discount.
Open-ended funds should also have the flexibility to use secondary sales to help manage liquidity in the portfolio. Actively selling portfolio investments can help to raise cash in the fund in periods where subscriptions are low and redemption requests are increasing. For many assets classes, the secondaries market has become very deep and therefore more liquid than it was 10-15 years ago, although it can still be prone to high cyclical discounts. Hence the importance of a diverse portfolio to provide more flexibility when looking to sell assets.
2. Specific liquidity management tools
Given the inherent liquidity in the asset classes, there is a range of tools investment managers will incorporate in the design of the fund to ensure the investment strategy is adhered to over the long term. This includes mechanisms that restrict the fund liquidity in accordance with the long-term nature of the asset class, and avoid a forced sale of assets that might damage performance. These tools can also vary based on the fund and its investment strategy.
The key tools are:
Redemption notice periods
Investors in the fund are required to provide advance notice of when they wish to redeem from the fund. These vary from fund to fund but a three-month notice period has commonly been adopted in line with a quarterly redemption frequency. Applying such a notice period removes the tendency for investors to behave impulsively according to macroeconomic events or volatility in the listed markets.
A notice period also allows the investment manager to better plan for redemption requests from investors. As mentioned above, the LTAF framework requires funds to have a minimum notice period of 90 days. Whilst other regulatory regimes may offer more flexibility when structuring other semi-liquid funds, many managers elect for a similarly extended notice period when compared to typical open-ended mutual funds.
Redemption limit
A key feature of semi-liquid vehicles and LTAFs is the ability of managers to set limits on the total percentage of the overall portfolio redeemed at each dealing day. As an example, a manager might determine that 5% net redemptions per quarter is appropriate, giving an annual limit of 20% per year.
This limit should be set in line with underlying liquidity of the fund’s portfolio, so it could vary from fund to fund. Limiting redemptions to a set amount ensures that redemptions can be paid out of liquid assets or cash. This is in the best interest of investors as it protects the longer-term illiquid assets from being sold at a discount, which would impact the returns for all investors.
Redemption suspension limits
Under normal circumstances, investors can buy or sell shares in a semi-liquid structure according to the specified dealing frequency and cut-off time. However, there may be exceptional situations or market stress events where the fund manager has the discretion to temporarily stop accepting redemptions and/or subscriptions for a specified period if they believe it is in the best interest of existing shareholders.
Lock-up periods
When a fund is new, there might be a ramp-up period during which no redemptions are permitted to allow a portfolio to be developed and create sufficient diversification. The lock-up period varies according to asset class and investment strategy.
Special dealing procedure after suspension period
During any period when the calculation of the fund's NAV per share is suspended, no shares can be issued or redeemed. If the suspension of the NAV calculation lasts for a specific pre-determined period, the managers may introduce additional measures to handle extraordinary circumstances they believe require special procedures to protect the interests of existing shareholders. This could involve all investors being offered the option to redeem, followed by an extended period for the manager to liquidate fund assets and return funds to investors.
These rules provide flexibility to managers in managing liquidity and protecting shareholders' interests during exceptional market or economic conditions. It's important to note that such measures are typically implemented as a last resort and are intended to be temporary in nature.
These liquidity mechanisms aim to strike a balance between providing investors with access to their investments and ensuring the fund's overall stability and liquidity. However, it’s important for investors to understand that these mechanisms may introduce additional risks and limitations. Fund structures and their liquidity mechanisms can also vary depending on the jurisdiction and regulatory framework.
What happens when an investor chooses to redeem their holding?
In some semi-liquid funds or LTAFs, redemption requests are first netted off against subscriptions received in the same period. If the net of those flows is positive – there are more subscriptions than redemptions, then additional commitments and secondary purchases can be made in the portfolio.
If there is a net outflow, it will be met by the fund liquidity as outlined above.
If redemptions for the quarter exceed the established threshold, then the amount will be reduced pro rata to ensure every investor in the fund has been treated fairly. The amount not dealt will then roll into the next dealing day, where it will be treated equal to other redemptions received for that dealing day, unless cancelled by the investor.
Liquidity management in other structures available for private investors
Closed-ended funds. While closed-ended private asset vehicles have been around for a long time, there has been product innovation to better address investor needs, especially private individual investors.
Some closed-ended funds can now have single capital calls, shorter investment periods, lower investment minimums and regulatory structures that open up to a broader set of investors. Whilst the primary objective of the funds is to remain invested for the fund term, in some cases the manager will operate liquidity windows when investors are able to trade with one another or with a buyer of last resort.
Closed-ended listed. Liquidity for closed-ended listed funds, or investment trusts (ITs) in the UK, in normal market conditions is in line with other traded equities, with intra-day trading available. This liquidity profile and ease of access is what has traditionally driven their potential suitability for more retail or “mass affluent” investors.
In traditional ITs the share price can move independently of the stated NAV. Investors may face a situation, if selling, where the share price is at a (potentially significant) discount to NAV. Many investors favour the IT structure for exactly this reason, attracted to the potential to take advantage of a dislocation between the trading price and intrinsic value, but it must be factored in when making the decision to invest in these assets.
Obtaining liquidity has caused some issues in the past, with isolated instances of adverse market environments compromising the ability of sellers to find a willing buyer on the other side. In our view, this should be managed by appropriate portfolio construction and due regard to an individual client’s circumstances, such a time horizon, risk appetite and need for liquid access to their capital.
Subscribe to our Insights
Visit our preference center, where you can choose which Schroders Insights you would like to receive.
Autheurs
Topics