Hurricane season: Insurance-linked securities and navigating non-financial risks
As we approach the Atlantic hurricane season, and with the fallout from the California wildfires still making headlines, we examine how Schroders Capital’s insurance-linked securities team deploys its active strategy to navigate changing market and climatic conditions.
Autheurs
It is the time of year when attention, particularly in states along the Gulf and East Coasts of the US, and within the insurance sectors, turns to what we might see during the coming hurricane season in the Atlantic Basin. Colorado State University (CSU) issued its first forecast for the 2025 season earlier this month, in which it predicted “above average” activity that was widely reported on in the media, albeit under less dramatic headlines than in 2024.
The Atlantic hurricane season, which is considered to last from June to November, is a key period because that is when landfalling hurricanes are most likely to occur. It is also when investments that are exposed to these weather-related events face their peak time of being “on-risk” and associated risk premia are earned.
Crucially, many of the states and counties in affected regions of the US, and some impacted areas in the Caribbean, are densely populated and very economically active. The combination of potentially extreme natural hazard and high economic values can lead to devastating financial outcomes for private individuals and commercial enterprises.
This is why it is such an important time of the year for insurers and investors in insurance-linked securities (ILS). ILS provide protection for entities such as insurers and reinsurers against the risks associated with catastrophic natural events, such as hurricanes, and, in doing so, they also represent a source of long-term returns for investors.
Early-season forecasts therefore have the potential to cause these interested parties to adjust their risk appetite ahead of the start of the season. However, and as we will cover in more detail below, this can be pre-emptive given the challenges with early forecasts and the variable correlation between number of storms and financial losses.
What the 2025 forecast says – and what this means
CSU’s models are based on a number of statistical and meteorological models, focusing on variables such as Atlantic sea surface temperatures, sea level pressures, vertical wind shear levels (changes in wind speed or direction), and the El Niño Southern Oscillation (a recurring climate phenomenon that influences wind patterns in the tropical Atlantic).
For 2025, the early forecast – which is subject to change in future revisions and includes a high degree of uncertainty – is for an above average season in terms of hurricane activity, albeit closer to the long-term average than the early forecasts for last year. This is primarily due to warmer Atlantic sea temperatures and the current forecast for a ‘neutral’ El Niño, and so an absence of the associated upper-level westerly winds in the tropical Atlantic that are disruptive to hurricane formation, during the peak of the season.
Specifically, the CSU forecast is for 17 named storms to occur this year, of which nine would be hurricanes and four classified as “major” (category 3, 4 or 5). The report additionally includes probabilities of a hurricane making landfall, which is 26% for the US East Coast, including the Florida Peninsula, and 56% for the Caribbean.
A summary of the current CSU predictions is included in the table below:
CSU forecast for 2025 hurricane activity vs long-term average
Source: Colorado State University (CSU), April 2025. *CSU released its first seasonal forecast on 3 April 2025, with updated forecasts to follow on 11 June, 9 July and 6 August. +A measure of a named storm’s potential for wind and storm surge destruction defined as the sum of the square of a named storm’s maximum wind speed (in 104 knots2) for each six-hour period of its existence.
It is important to note in relation to these figures that a hurricane season with a high number of storm formations does not in and of itself drive the severity of the financial impact we will see from the season. This is determined more by the combination of an actual landfall (or multiple landfalls) in one of those densely populated areas mentioned earlier, for which the consequences can be severe.
In this context it is instructive to look back at what we saw during 2024, which was predicted to be a much more active season than the average, and indeed than 2025, and will be remembered for the devastation wrought by Hurricanes Helene and Milton. However, thanks largely to a lull in storm activity in the middle of the season, and the landfalling locations of those named storms, the overall scale and impact of the hurricane season was less than had been feared.
From an insurance perspective, the losses associated with these hurricanes were similarly far less severe than what had been estimated. In fact, in 2024 losses attributable to hurricanes ($30-50 billion) were less than the combined losses ($50 billion+) associated with so-called “secondary perils”, such as tornadoes, hailstorms, wildfires and floods. These perils are generally not expected to result in very large losses from individual events, although there are exceptions such as the Los Angeles wildfires of January 2025 (see more on this below).
Given the uncertainty of early-season forecasts, as alluded to above we recommend investors not to take investment decisions either to increase or decrease exposure to ILS purely based on these models. From our analysis of historical forecasting, we have found they do not accurately reflect the impacts, risk premium or returns that will occur during the season, which is the most important part of the year for the catastrophe (cat) bond market.
Schroders Capital ILS strategy management
Schroders Capital’s insurance-linked securities team maintains an active investment strategy incorporating both the primary (investing in a new bond or security when it is issued) and secondary (buying and selling exposure to existing securities) ILS markets, as well as in both public and private ILS investments.
The high level of issuance in the primary ILS market (see chart below), the high degree of liquidity available in the secondary market for public ILS (i.e. cat bonds) and the short-term duration of private ILS contracts, enable the team to adjust portfolios in response to changing market and climatic conditions. This means we can effectively navigate the evolving and variable nature of the non-financial risks to which the underlying portfolios are exposed.
Primary ILS issuance volume on a record-setting pace in 2025
Source: www.Artemis.bm deal directory.
Among the specific tactics the team utilises, which can be especially helpful in managing the portfolio through an active hurricane season, are:
Being underweight transactions with a narrow territorial scope, such as those sponsored by local insurance companies in Florida, to minimise concentration risk.
Being overweight other peak perils such as California earthquake, to ensure adequate diversification of risk.
Maintaining a cautious approach to secondary perils, such as wildfire, for which there is less sophisticated modelling making them more difficult to predict – and in relation to which losses have risen in recent years.
Taking advantage of primary and secondary market opportunities as the market evolves.
ILS market trends
The ILS market is performing well so far in 2025. The European winter season passed without any severe windstorms, while in the cat bond market the primary issuance pipeline has been very strong, with a close to record amount of issuance in Q1 and continued heavy issuance into Q2 (see above).
On the downside, the Los Angeles wildfires in January caused insured losses estimated between $30 and $40 billion, some of which made their way to the ILS market. The impact was modest but notable in the wider cat bond market, with the Swiss Re Global Cat Bond TR Index showing -0.85% performance in January.
This compares with performance that was much closer to, or above, 0% in our core cat bond portfolios. This outperformance in turn reflects the fact that Schroders Capital funds are deliberately underweight exposure to the peril of wildfire, principally due to the team’s more cautious view of this risk than that proposed in the marketing materials of affected bonds.
In the private ILS market some strategies with higher-risk profiles, and those exposed to frequency rather than severity of risk (such as reinsurance sidecars that share proportionally in sponsors’ portfolios), have reportedly been severely impacted. So far there has been little reported in the public domain, but we expect this to materialise at some point.
More broadly, spread multiples reduced during 2024 and leading into 2025, as fresh capital was attracted to the ILS market. This resulted in a more balanced market from a supply and demand perspective. The strong pipeline of primary issuance, and the impact of the Los Angeles wildfires, caused the rate of reduction in spread multiples to reduce.
The market has shown pricing discipline in recent weeks and spread multiples have settled at a level which is, while lower than the record levels of the last two years, still attractive compared to long-term levels.
Subscribe to our Insights
Visit our preference center, where you can choose which Schroders Insights you would like to receive.
Autheurs
Topics