Private Markets Outlook Q2 2026: five key takeaways for wealth investors
Private markets benefit from structural factors that are especially relevant at a time of renewed uncertainty, but not all strategies are created equal.
Autheurs
Over the past year, investors have grappled with a volatile backdrop shaped by geopolitical tensions, shifting economic regimes and structural transformation across energy, technology and demographics. The conflict in Iran and across the Middle East has added a fresh layer of uncertainty, driving sharp moves in energy markets and reinforcing how quickly traditional asset allocations can be disrupted.
For long-term wealth investors, this is a reminder that resilience is not simply about short-term capital preservation – it is about building portfolios capable of delivering sustainable returns through persistent shocks and structural change.
Below we summarise five key takeaways from Schroders Capital’s Private Markets Investment Outlook Q2 2026, highlighting why we believe private market asset classes continue to stand out for their resilient returns potential in a market that faces persistent volatility and upheaval – and why selectivity remains critical.
1. Why private markets now – but not all strategies are equal
Private markets offer both structural and cyclical advantages that are particularly relevant in today’s environment.
Structurally private markets are designed to focus on long-term value creation rather than short-term market sentiment. At the same time, these asset classes provide access to a broader and more specialised opportunity set – ranging from domestically oriented companies to assets with differentiated risk exposures and lower correlation to public markets.
Cyclically, the picture is equally compelling. While public equities had reached record highs leading into the current crisis and credit spreads had tightened, many private market segments have experienced several years of subdued fundraising, investment and exit activity. This has created inefficiencies and attractive entry points, particularly in less crowded areas.
However, resilience within private markets is far from uniform, with dispersion between strategies – and even within asset classes. Identifying structurally advantaged segments is key to capturing the potential of this evolving investment universe.
- In private equity, small and mid-market buyouts have proven more resilient than large-cap transactions.
- In venture, early-stage opportunities remain attractive, while late-stage AI-driven investments carry concentration risk.
- In private debt, headline concerns around direct lending contrast with opportunities across broader credit alternatives.
- In real estate, the gap between prime and commodity assets continues to widen.
- In infrastructure, operational assets are increasingly scarce and valuable, while development-stage projects face more headwinds.
2. Private equity: uneven adjustments favour small and mid-market
Private equity remains in a period of recalibration following the post-pandemic boom. Fundraising and deal activity have slowed materially, and while there were early signs of recovery in late 2025, renewed geopolitical uncertainty may delay a broader rebound.
Yet this slowdown has created a more attractive entry environment – particularly in segments where capital is less concentrated.
Adjustments across the market have been uneven. Capital continues to be heavily skewed toward large funds and transactions, leaving small and mid-market buyouts comparatively undercapitalised and often more inefficient. This imbalance has translated into persistent valuation discounts – typically in the range of 20–40% relative to large-cap buyouts, and even wider versus public market equivalents.
These smaller companies also offer structural advantages. They tend to be more domestically focused, less exposed to global trade disruptions, and more reliant on operational value creation rather than financial engineering. Combined with generally lower leverage levels, this can enhance resilience in volatile environments.
Importantly, historical performance supports this thesis: small and mid-cap buyouts have outperformed large-cap funds over the long term – suggesting that entry pricing advantages and structural benefits can translate into stronger returns.
Small/mid buyout funds have performed strongest over the long run
Past performance is not a guide to future performance and may not be repeated. Source: Preqin Pro, data as of 4 February 2026, Schroders Capital, 2026. Currency used is $. Buyout – Small includes Private Equity closed-ended funds below $500m, Buyout – Mid between $500m and $1.5bn, Buyout – Large between $1.5bn and $4.5bn and Buyout – Mega above $4.5bn. The views shared are those of Schroders Capital and may not be verified.
Beyond buyouts, other areas of private equity are evolving:
- Continuation vehicles have become a structural feature of the market, offering lower fees, faster liquidity and historically more predictable return profiles.
- Early-stage venture continues to benefit from diversified innovation at more reasonable valuations – in contrast to late-stage venture, where AI investments have elevated valuation and concentration risks.
3. Private debt and credit alternatives: look beyond the headlines
Private credit has come under increasing scrutiny, particularly in traditional direct lending. Concerns around sector concentration, valuation levels and liquidity – alongside redemption pressures in some funds – have dominated headlines.
However, these risks need to be put into context. Structural features such as gating mechanisms help limit forced selling, while the broader opportunity set within the wider universe of credit alternatives is far more diverse than the headlines suggest, with lower exposure to idiosyncratic risks.
Meanwhile, likely delays to rates normalisation – and even potential rates increases – coupled with wider regulatory changes to Basel III and Solvency II frameworks should be favourable to securitisation markets, though the full impact will take time to materialise.
For investors seeking stable income and diversification, this credit alternatives universe offers compelling opportunities, particularly in strategies backed by collateral or contractual cashflows. Several areas stand out:
- Asset-based finance (ABF) - ABF provides exposure to diversified pools of underlying assets – such as mortgages, auto loans or aircraft leases – typically across hundreds or thousands of borrowers. This granularity reduces reliance on individual issuers, while structural protections and floating-rate characteristics offer income resilience and downside mitigation.
- Commercial real estate (CRE) debt - Following a significant reset in property valuations, CRE debt now offers lending opportunities at lower bases. Structural inefficiencies – driven in part by regulatory constraints – are creating gaps in financing for development and transitional assets, particularly in sectors such as multi-family housing.
- Infrastructure debt - Infrastructure lending continues to provide stable, defensive income backed by essential assets. Inflation-linked revenues and regulated frameworks offer protection in an environment where inflation risks may re-emerge.
- Insurance-linked securities (ILS) - ILS remains a true diversifier, with returns driven by insured events rather than economic cycles. This provides valuable portfolio diversification, particularly in periods of geopolitical and macro uncertainty.
Private premium is higher, but not constant
Past performance is not a guide to future performance. Source: Schroders Capital, Bloomberg, CS, Swiss Re, Bank of America as of September 2025. The views and opinions shared are those of the Schroders Capital Securitized Products & Asset-Based Finance Team and are subject to change. Shown for illustrative purposes and should not be viewed as investment guidance.
4. Infrastructure: long-term support; short-term pricing tailwinds
The recent energy shock has reinforced the strategic importance of energy security and, by extension, the long-term case for energy transition infrastructure investment.
However, the impact will not be immediate. As seen in previous crises, the acceleration of renewable investment tends to be policy-driven and materialises over time, rather than as an instant market response. Higher financing costs and supply chain pressures may also delay near-term deployment.
In the meantime, certain assets stand to benefit directly. Operational renewable infrastructure with merchant price exposure can capture higher power prices, providing a near-term earnings tailwind.
Beyond this, the broader investment case for infrastructure remains compelling. Structural demand is increasing, driven by electrification, AI and data centre expansion, while valuations have reset, creating more attractive entry points following the interest rate cycle. Meanwhile revenue models typically offer inflation protection, either through contractual indexation or indirect exposure to energy prices.
Core infrastructure returns have materially re-rated
Past performance is not a guide to future performance. Source: Listed Greencoat fund quarterly reports Q1 2015- Q1 2025. Discount rate refers to UK wind assets. There is no guarantee that this rate trajectory will remain the same in the foreseeable future.
More broadly, regional dynamics are diverging. Europe and Asia remain central to renewable expansion, while US policy changes have introduced greater complexity. Across all markets, however, renewables continue to be among the most cost-effective source of new power generation, with battery storage emerging as a particularly attractive sub-sector.
5. Real estate: fresh headwinds, but still at an inflection point
After an extended period of repricing, global real estate markets are showing early signs of recovery. Transaction activity has begun to pick up, and pricing appears to be stabilising and even rising in key areas – suggesting that the asset class may be at an inflection point.
Divergence in pace and depth of repricing – and recovery
Source: MSCI, Green Street Advisors, Schroders Capital, December 2025. Past Performance is not a guide to future performance and may not be repeated. The value of investments and the income from them may go down as well as up and investors may not get back the amounts originally invested. Exchange rate changes may cause the value of any overseas investments to rise or fall.
However, the renewed geopolitical backdrop introduces fresh risks. Higher energy prices could feed into inflation, potentially delaying interest rate cuts and weighing on the recovery.
Despite this, several factors continue to support the investment case:
- Valuations have reset significantly, creating more attractive entry points.
- Supply constraints remain strong, with high construction costs and limited financing slowing new development.
- Rental dynamics are improving, supported by “cost-push” inflation and limited supply.
Importantly, performance is becoming increasingly differentiated. The gap between high-quality, future-proofed assets and more commoditised properties has widened considerably.
In this environment, selectivity is critical. Sectors offering inflation protection and operational upside – such as logistics, residential, self-storage and hospitality – are particularly attractive. Assets with shorter lease durations or explicit inflation linkage can also provide near-term cashflow resilience.
The current environment is also creating a significant pipeline of recapitalisation and secondaries opportunities, as owners face refinancing challenges and seek new capital solutions. These situations can offer attractive entry points for investors with the ability to provide flexible capital.
Subscribe to our Insights
Visit our preference center, where you can choose which Schroders Insights you would like to receive.
Autheurs
Topics