New horizons in private credit: why infrastructure debt stands out today
In a market shaped by geopolitical volatility and renewed inflationary pressures, investors are reassessing how they build resilient income allocations. Infrastructure debt offers a differentiated, diversifying source of yield – backed by essential assets, contracted cashflows and strong downside protection.
Autheurs
For much of the past decade, private credit has benefited from a highly supportive backdrop.
Stable inflation, low interest rates, ample liquidity, and a retreat of banks from many areas of lending created a favourable investment climate – which was matched by rising demand from investors seeking alternative sources of yield. This in turn drove strong inflows and rapid growth in assets under management, particularly within corporate direct lending.
That environment is changing. Today’s market backdrop is defined by heightened geopolitical uncertainty, structurally higher inflation risks and more volatile interest rate expectations.
The ongoing ripple effects from conflict in the Middle East are also reinforcing concerns around energy security, supply chains and fiscal resilience across developed economies.
Amid this shifting landscape, investors are placing renewed emphasis on portfolio income – not only as a source of resilience, but increasingly as a key contributor to overall returns – and diversifying the sources of that income.
This is not about abandoning private credit. Nor do we believe recent headlines surrounding some parts of the market fairly represent the overall health of the asset class. However, the current environment is encouraging investors to think more carefully about the make-up of their private credit allocations, and about the characteristics and exposures they want income-generating assets to provide.
In our view, infrastructure debt is particularly well positioned in this context.
As part of a broader diversified income allocation, infrastructure debt can offer a combination of resilient cashflows, downside protection and attractive income that is difficult to replicate elsewhere in private markets, while tapping into long-term investment megatrends.
A changing macro backdrop: tailwinds for infrastructure
The resurgence of inflation risk, driven by the energy price shock unleashed by the conflict in the Middle East, has materially changed the investment landscape.
The ongoing conflict has brought complexity – and both risk and opportunity – in other ways as well. Beyond the impact of higher energy prices and supply chain disruption, it has underscored the need for governments, especially in Europe and Asia, to prioritise economic resilience, security and independence. This has significant infrastructure implications.
Strengthening energy security, accelerating electrification, modernising transport systems, and boosting domestic industrial capacity and productivity will require substantial long-term investment. Defence and strategic resilience also increasingly depend on infrastructure readiness, from energy networks to transport and logistics systems.
This creates powerful long-term tailwinds for infrastructure investment – and, in turn, reinforces long-term demand for infrastructure debt financing, which has already supported the growth and maturation of the asset class.
Infrastructure debt is a growing asset class
Past performance is not a reliable indicator of future performance. Source: Preqin, 2026.
Importantly for investors today, many infrastructure assets are also structurally better positioned to navigate inflationary environments than traditional corporate businesses. Revenues are often linked, fully or partially, to inflation through contractual frameworks, regulated tariff structures or concession agreements. In sectors such as renewables, some assets may also benefit in the short term from periods of elevated power prices.
Many infrastructure debt exposures are also floating rate, which means that as base rates rise, investors’ income increases correspondingly, with borrowers typically hedging interest rate risk at the asset level to maintain debt service stability.
Of course, not all infrastructure sectors behave identically. Certain transportation assets, particularly those more exposed to GDP growth or discretionary consumer spending, may face greater pressure in weaker economic environments or during periods of elevated fuel costs. Airports and some toll road assets, for example, can exhibit greater sensitivity to affordability pressures and demand fluctuations.
In common with other private markets asset classes, this reinforces the importance of manager and asset selection in infrastructure debt. Sector expertise, underwriting discipline and asset-level analysis remain essential.
Broadening the private credit toolkit
Alongside macro uncertainty, the private credit market itself is evolving.
Corporate direct lending has grown rapidly over the past decade, attracting substantial inflows from institutional investors seeking enhanced yield in a low-rate world. The asset class has delivered strong outcomes overall and remains an important component of many portfolios.
However, as capital has flowed into the market, competition has intensified. In some areas, this has compressed spreads and weakened lender protections, and increased structural complexity.
Recent headlines have drawn attention to these dynamics. While much of the discussion arguably overstates broader market risks – and, in our view, many of the current challenges are more related to liquidity than solvency – it has prompted investors to reassess their private credit exposure.
Infrastructure debt offers a differentiated risk profile within this broader universe.
Unlike many areas of corporate direct lending, infrastructure debt is typically secured against essential, hard assets with long economic lives and high barriers to entry. As noted earlier, cashflows are often contractual or regulated in nature, reducing dependence on short-term economic growth assumptions.
This distinction becomes particularly relevant in sectors currently attracting scrutiny within broader private credit markets. Software and asset-light business models, for example, have very different risk characteristics from essential infrastructure assets.
Even within areas such as data centres, where investment activity has accelerated significantly in recent years, underwriting discipline remains critical. Demand growth driven by artificial intelligence and cloud adoption continues to create substantial investment opportunities, but quality and location matter enormously. Assets located close to end users, with strong connectivity and durable competitive positioning, are fundamentally different from more speculative developments that are riding a broader wave.
Infrastructure debt fundamentals
While infrastructure debt has historically been associated with long-dated, investment-grade lending, the market has evolved considerably over the past decade. Today, it encompasses a broad spectrum of opportunities across risk, return and duration profiles.
At one end of the market are senior, investment-grade loans suited to investors seeking to prioritise portfolio resilience, such as insurers seeking liability-matching characteristics and highly predictable cashflows.
At the other are shorter-duration, sub-investment-grade or junior debt opportunities that can offer materially enhanced yields while still benefiting from the defensive characteristics associated with infrastructure assets.
Infrastructure debt offers a range of exposures
IG & Crossover | Sub-IG | High Yield | |
Implied rating (avg.) | BBB/BB+ | BB- | B |
Duration (avg.) | 5 - 7/10yrs
| 5 - 7yrs | 3 - 7yrs |
Seniority | Senior | Senior & subordinated | Senior & subordinated |
Spread over base rate | 150 - 325bps | 400 - 600bps | 750bps+ |
Investor allocation bucket | Fixed income alternative | Alternative credit / private debt | Alternative credit/ private debt |
Maturity of debt segment | Mature | Established, growing | Underserved, growing |
Main market participants | Banks/ Institutional investors / Infra debt funds | Infra debt funds | Infra debt funds |
Source: Schroders Capital, 2026. For illustrative purpose only. There is no guarantee that forecasted figures will be achieved. Not to be considered a recommendation to buy or sell.
This breadth allows infrastructure debt to serve different investor objectives within a broader portfolio framework. What remains consistent across the asset class is the underlying resilience of the assets being financed – and the stable credit profile this supports.
Infrastructure assets are typically essential to economic activity and daily life. They operate within high barriers to entry, supported by high replacement costs, regulatory protections or long-term concession agreements. As a result, they frequently exhibit stable demand characteristics and robust operating margins. Historically, this has translated into strong credit performance.
Rating agencies have historically consistently observed lower default rates and higher recovery rates for infrastructure-related lending relative to broader corporate credit. At Schroders Capital, we have more than a decade-long track record in the asset class and have seen consistently strong credit stability across more than 200 transactions.
Infrastructure debt has proven resilience across various credit cycles
Source: Schroders Capital, 2026. S&P Global Ratings Credit Research & Insights. January 1999 through January 2023.
Equally important is the income profile infrastructure debt can offer. Despite its defensive characteristics, infrastructure debt continues to provide attractive spreads over public corporate debt markets – and even compared to corporate direct lending with a similar risk profile.
These spreads are supported by structural factors including transaction complexity, illiquidity premia, bespoke bilateral negotiation and the specialist expertise required to originate and manage investments effectively.
All-in spreads for IG and sub-IG infrastructure debt vs listed comparables
Past performance is not a guide to future performance and may not be repeated. Source: Schroders Capital, 2026. 1As of February 2026, on a weighted average and all-in basis on all portfolio, including realised all-in spread shown for repaid deals. 2Average spread premium over February 2026.
In our view, this remains one of the most compelling aspects of the asset class today.
Investors are not simply trading off liquidity by allocating to a buy-and-hold asset class. Rather, infrastructure debt can offer an illiquidity premium and income alongside defensive characteristics with diversification benefits.
A deep and expanding market opportunity
Another outdated perception is that infrastructure debt is a niche or capacity-constrained market. In reality, the addressable infrastructure financing universe is vast and continues to grow rapidly.
Global infrastructure investment needs already extend into the trillions of dollars, driven by structural megatrends including decarbonisation, digitalisation, energy security and demographic change. Governments alone cannot finance these requirements, increasing reliance on private capital and private debt financing solutions.
Europe remains one of the deepest and most diversified infrastructure debt markets globally. Public policy support for renewable energy, electricity grid modernisation, transport electrification, social infrastructure and digital infrastructure continues to create a broad pipeline of financing opportunities.
Rising demand for infrastructure debt financing in Europe
Source: Infralogic, 2026.
Importantly, the market also spans a wide range of sectors, jurisdictions and contractual structures, enabling managers to remain highly selective.
Despite this growth, infrastructure debt remains a relatively specialised market with fewer established participants than broader direct lending. In our view, this creates meaningful advantages for managers with long-standing origination capabilities, sector expertise and sponsor relationships.
The ability to source proprietary opportunities, negotiate robust protections and maintain disciplined underwriting standards becomes increasingly valuable as competition elsewhere in private credit intensifies.
New horizons
Infrastructure debt is not a wholesale replacement for fixed income, or even broader private credit, allocations. However, we believe it represents a compelling core allocation within private credit and/or real assets portfolios delivering diversified income. With an expanding risk-return continuum, infrastructure debt now also offers double-digit returns for higher return seeking investors.
The current market environment reinforces the case for investment strategies delivering resilient income returns. Investors are navigating a world characterised by higher geopolitical uncertainty, elevated inflation risks and increased dispersion across private credit markets. In that context, the combination of contractual cashflows, floating-rate and potentially premium income, strong downside protection and exposure to essential assets becomes particularly valuable.
Importantly, infrastructure debt is also benefiting from powerful structural tailwinds. The global need for investment across energy, digital, transport and social infrastructure continues to expand – as does the demand for a range of financing options to meet ambitious spending and development plans.
This translates into a deep and growing opportunity set for experienced managers. As always, however, successful investing depends on selectivity and underwriting discipline.
Subscribe to our Insights
Visit our preference center, where you can choose which Schroders Insights you would like to receive.
Autheurs
Topics