Investment Insights

Chasing growth: A history of the top 10 since the 1980s


Kevin Murphy

Kevin Murphy

Fund Manager, Equity Value

See all articles

Why, generally speaking, are investors happy to stump up more for growth stocks than value ones? Since 2007, in fact, the former have on average traded at a premium of around 70% to the latter – and presumably the reasoning behind this boils down to a widespread perception that, over an extended period of time, growth businesses see bigger profits more quickly than their value counterparts.

Effectively, then, investors are banking on such businesses ‘growing’ into their elevated multiples – paying more today in the belief that, eventually, they will end up ahead of the game. One wrinkle to such thinking, however, is that the game has materially changed over the last couple of years in a key respect – rather than that longer-term 70% premium for growth stocks, investors are now paying something closer to 170%.


  •  Investors are potentially paying a premium of up to 170% on growth stocks, leaving little room for them to 'grow' into elevated multiples. 
  • Each decade since the 1980s has shown that the top 10 growth stocks are unlikely to remain in the top 10 the following year. Investors need to remember that they cannot predict what businesses will remain successful over the years. 
  • A valuation-based approach focuses on the long term as a way of avoiding buying into any prevailing opinions that could influence portfolio decisions, and, on average and over the long run, should deliver for investors.

That begs a question – given profits have increased for the last 12 years or so, why would people suddenly be willing to pay double what they were just two years ago? If you are paying such a premium before profits increase, then at least your investment should be growing into that larger multiple – but paying up after the event? That makes a whole lot less sense.

Having thought long and hard about this the only possible explanation we can see is investors must have become more confident that they know what the future holds for growth companies. Apparently they know what profits such businesses are going to generate, apparently they know they will continue to grow quickly – and so it follows, apparently, they deserve a higher valuation multiple.

In stark contrast, we have consistently argued the future is uncertain and thus impossible to predict. That being so, we have no idea what is going to happen in the world tomorrow, next week or in five years’ time. What we do know, however, is this is by no means the first time investors around the world have convinced themselves they know what the future holds …

Let’s go back in time to the start of another decade – the most successful films of the year end up including Airplane!, 9 to 5 and The Empire Strikes Back. Rather less happily, 1980 also sees the start of the Iran-Iraq War, leading to a spike in the oil price to around USD$40 a barrel – the equivalent of USD$115 in today’s terms.

Investors became convinced that price would remain high and duly directed their money toward oil stocks – with the result that the list of the world’s 10 largest companies in 1980 was full of such businesses. As you can see from the following table, six of the 10 – from Exxon down to Atlantic Richfield – operated in the oil sector but, a decade later, only Exxon of the oil stocks and IBM of the other quartet would make the same list.

The 10 largest global stocks – 1980

IBM
AT&T
Exxon
Standard Oil
Schlumberger
Shell
Mobil
Atlantic Richfield
General Electric
Eastman Kodak

Source: Research Affiliates

At the very start of the 1990s, the most successful films of the year end up including Ghost, Home Alone and Pretty Woman. The market is also playing a different tune, having become convinced Japan would continue its trajectory from emerging market to global powerhouse with nothing able to stand in its path.

And, as you can see from the next table, Japanese businesses dominated the list of the world’s 10 largest companies in 1990 – with the only other representatives being the two survivors from 1980 – but how many would still be there a decade on? Ultimately, of the Japanese contingent, only NTT would make the class of 2000 – though a post-merger Exxon Mobil does notch up a third appearance.

The 10 largest global stocks – 1990

NTT
Bank of Tokyo-Mitsubishi
Industrial Bank of Japan
Sumitomo Mitsui Banking
Toyota Motors
Fuji Bank
Dai-Ichi Kangyo Bank
IBM
UFJ Bank
Exxon

Source: Research Affiliates

As the new Millennium dawns, the most successful films of the year end up including Cast Away, Gladiator and Mission: Impossible 2. And, rather than learning any lessons from past mistakes, the market has a new dream of its own – now convinced technology, media and telecoms (TMT) stocks are the only place to be.

The 10 largest global stocks – 2000

Microsoft
General Electric
NTT DoCoMo
Cisco Systems
Wal-Mart
Intel
NTT
Exxon Mobil
Lucent Technologies
Deutsche Telekom

Source: Research Affiliates

Just three months into 2000, however, that dream had begun to turn into a nightmare and, 10 years on, Microsoft would prove the only TMT business to retain its place among the world’s largest companies – this time accompanied by Wal-Mart and, once again, Exxon Mobil. By now, though, investors have had 30 years to reflect on where they might have gone wrong and … have this time chosen to fixate on the ‘BRICs’.

The economies of Brazil, Russia, India and China, on which investors had become convinced they should focus their attention as a proxy for the population boom, demographic shifts and accompanying demand for natural resources generally being seen in many of the world’s emerging markets.

So, as 2010 begins with Toy Story 3, Alice In Wonderland and the first instalment of Harry Potter and the Deathly Hallows set to be the year’s most successful films, the list of the world’s largest companies is dominated by Chinese banks, Brazilian oil companies and global miners.

The 10 largest global stocks – 2010

PetroChina
Exxon Mobil
Microsoft
ICBC
Wal-Mart
China Construction Bank
BHP Billiton
HSBC
Petrobras Technologies
Apple Inc.

Source: Research Affiliates

As another new decade begins, and with Parasite being the first foreign-language best picture winner, are any of the 2010 vintage still in there among the world’s largest companies? The final numbers will not be available for a month or two yet but, as of the end of September, Microsoft and Apple – the sole survivors from 2010 – were the only trillion-dollar businesses on the planet.

And has the market finally learned its lesson about paying up to bet on big themes it believes can be dependably forecasted? In order to search out any latest obsession among investors – not to mention to maintain the consistency of our table sources – we will take the whole top 10 from this time last year and, as Yogi Berra would have said, it is déjà vu all over again.

The 10 largest global stocks – 2019

Microsoft
Apple Inc.
Amazon.com
Alphabet Inc.
Berkshire Hathaway
Facebook
Tencent
Alibaba Group
Johnson & Johnson
JPMorgan Chase

Source: Research Affiliates

As you can see, this time the principal theme can be characterised as ‘Tech 2.0’ or perhaps ‘The Age of Disruption’ and, as ever, the question occurs: how many of these businesses will make the list in 10 years’ time? If you answered, ‘Who knows?’, give yourself a pat on the back but, either way, if you are currently betting on any of them appearing among the 2030 vintage, it is reasonable to note history is not on your side.

Rather than trying to predict an unknowable future, we focus on the long term as a way of avoiding buying into any prevailing opinions or other ‘noise’ that could influence portfolio decisions. We are mindful of their possible impact but can point to well over 100 years of history that shows an unemotional, valuation-based approach should, on average and over the long run, deliver for investors.

For more on value investing, click here for the Schroders Global Recovery Fund. 

Important Information:
This material has been issued by Schroder Investment Management Australia Limited (ABN 22 000 443 274, AFSL 226473) (Schroders) for information purposes only. It is intended solely for professional investors and financial advisers and is not suitable for distribution to retail clients. The views and opinions contained herein are those of the authors as at the date of publication and are subject to change due to market and other conditions. Such views and opinions may not necessarily represent those expressed or reflected in other Schroders communications, strategies or funds. The information contained is general information only and does not take into account your objectives, financial situation or needs. Schroders does not give any warranty as to the accuracy, reliability or completeness of information which is contained in this material. Except insofar as liability under any statute cannot be excluded, Schroders and its directors, employees, consultants or any company in the Schroders Group do not accept any liability (whether arising in contract, in tort or negligence or otherwise) for any error or omission in this material or for any resulting loss or damage (whether direct, indirect, consequential or otherwise) suffered by the recipient of this material or any other person. This material is not intended to provide, and should not be relied on for, accounting, legal or tax advice. Any references to securities, sectors, regions and/or countries are for illustrative purposes only. You should note that past performance is not a reliable indicator of future performance. Schroders may record and monitor telephone calls for security, training and compliance purposes.