China’s growth surprise is just the start
China’s growth surprise is just the start
The larger-than-expected slowdown in reported Chinese GDP, to 6.5% from 6.7% in the second quarter, has seemingly spooked markets and pushed policymakers across the institutional spectrum to promise support. However, we think a further slowdown is on the cards given that tariffs have yet to show up in the data, and the incipient, long-awaited weakness in the property sector. Furthermore, the ability to provide policy support faces more constraints than is commonly appreciated.
Consumption the cause?
A breakdown of the GDP data shows the slowdown came primarily from a diminished contribution of final consumption to growth, with investment and net exports apparently stable. Compared to the high frequency data, this is slightly puzzling; the average growth rate of retail sales was essentially unchanged in the third quarter, while the average growth rates of industrial production and fixed asset investment were sharply weaker. Monthly trade data does support an unchanged picture in trade, for now.
Some encouragement for China bulls came from the infrastructure investment data. Though still contracting, the pace has moderated considerably, suggesting that pressure on local governments to accelerate projects is having some effect. This seems likely to continue throughout the fourth quarter, though after that fresh fiscal stimulus will be needed.
Property market teetering
Unfortunately, even as infrastructure spending claws its way back, there are signs that the Chinese property sector is finally beginning to crumble in the face of tighter credit conditions. Mortgage lending and land sales are slowing, and real estate investment has also decelerated. Manufacturing investment has been resilient but will likely face headwinds as tariffs bite. On balance, the outlook for investment is still a challenging one.
On the subject of tariffs, stockpiling inventories or “frontloading” trade ahead of the imposition of tariffs at the end of September has probably been a factor behind the resilience of Chinese trade flows. We would expect October data to show a considerable slowdown. This will harm growth via the net exports channel, but we would also expect it to be reflected in weaker industrial production and manufacturing investment.
Overall then, the growth outlook is not a positive one, and this may have helped spur the initial market sell-off. Policymakers including economics minister Liu He and central bank chief Yi Gang appealed for calm and pledged support, prompting a market rally. The prospect of renewed fiscal and monetary stimulus certainly seems a welcome one given the headwinds the economy faces, yet we think policymakers are more constrained than markets may realise.
The People’s Bank of China (PBoC), for example, continues to claim it will pursue neutral monetary policy and will not weaken the renminbi, which seems to preclude much additional liquidity support. Meanwhile the Ministry of Finance remains somewhat cagey about additional fiscal stimulus; measures so far have simply been an acceleration of planned spending. In the PBoC’s case, the constraint is the fear that flooding the system with liquidity could pressure the currency and undermine the work done on deleveraging and derisking. The Ministry of Finance meanwhile is likely all too aware of the off balance sheet debt of local governments (estimated by S&P recently at $6 trillion) which would massively inflate the overall government debt burden. Additional fiscal stimulus will only add to the risks building there.
We suspect that ultimately fears over financial stability and unemployment will prompt additional stimulus, but that officials will be reluctant to commit to as strong a package of measures as markets might want. This suggests further market turmoil, and more pressure on the yuan, lie ahead.
- Investors expect even higher returns from the stock market in years ahead – despite coronavirus shock
- Forecasting the US election: should investors prepare for a new president?
- Market shock: how did investors react to the impact of Covid-19?
- Could the bounce-back be quashed by a second wave?
- What the data tells us about the shape of the US economic recovery
- Are small and mid-cap companies weathering the US economic storm?
The views and opinions contained herein are those of the Authors, and may not necessarily represent views expressed or reflected in other Schroders communications, strategies or funds.
This document is intended to be for information purposes only. The material is not intended as an offer or solicitation for the purchase or sale of any financial instrument. The material is not intended to provide, and should not be relied on for, accounting, legal or tax advice, or investment recommendations. Information herein is believed to be reliable but Schroders does not warrant its completeness or accuracy. No responsibility can be accepted for errors of fact or opinion. Reliance should not be placed on the views and information in the document when taking individual investment and/or strategic decisions.
Past performance is not a reliable indicator of future results, prices of shares and the income from them may fall as well as rise and investors may not get back the amount originally invested.
Schroders has expressed its own views in this document and these may change (to be used if the 1st statement above is not being used).
Issued by Schroder Investment Management (Europe) S.A., 5, rue Höhenhof, L-1736 Senningerberg, Luxembourg. Registered No. B 37.799. For your security, communications may be taped or monitored
The forecasts stated in the document are the result of statistical modelling, based on a number of assumptions. Forecasts are subject to a high level of uncertainty regarding future economic and market factors that may affect actual future performance. The forecasts are provided to you for information purposes as at today’s date. Our assumptions may change materially with changes in underlying assumptions that may occur, among other things, as economic and market conditions change. We assume no obligation to provide you with updates or changes to this data as assumptions, economic and market conditions, models or other matters change.