In focus

Which city tops the Schroders European Sustainable Cities index?

Amsterdam has topped the first Schroders European Sustainable Cities Index, closely followed by London and Paris in second and third place respectively. The 59 cities in the index are ranked on 13 equally weighted environmental policies. These cover areas such as renewable energy consumption targets, cleaner public transport, public electric vehicle charging stations, single use plastics, air quality, climate plans, carbon neutrality targets and waste policy.

The Schroders team identified these as important areas while reviewing environmental policy documents for cities, as well as European Union directives and goals which were used as guidelines for best practice. For example, the renewable public transport category scores cities on whether they have policies to use cleaner fuels in public transport.

Western and northern European cities dominate top spots in index

Amsterdam, London and Paris received similar scores across the policy categories that were included in the index, many of which were underpinned by comprehensive climate plans.

Moreover, the top spots in the index were dominated by western and northern European cities, with northern European cities falling almost exclusively in the top quartile. Eastern European cities were mainly ranked towards the lower end of the index except for Prague and Sofia.

“Both Amsterdam and Paris scored well on their ambitious 2050 targets for 100% of energy to come from renewable sources, said Schroders’ Hugo Machin who compiled the index.

“In this category, London lagged somewhat with a target of 15% by 2030. This was lower than the EU’s renewable energy directive, which aims for 27% of final energy consumption from renewables by 2030 and which was used as an indication of best practice to guide the scoring in this category.”

Leeds scores well, ahead of EU capital Brussels

UK regional city Leeds came in at 16th place on the index, ahead of some of its bigger European peers, such as Brussels which was ranked 18th. Leeds scored well across all policy categories with a comprehensive Net Zero Carbon Roadmap and a clean air strategy for the city.

By contrast, Brussels relatively poorer performance is due to a lack of a more ambitious carbon neutrality target than the EU (by 2050), whereas Leeds targets carbon neutrality by 2030. Brussels also seems to lack a clear renewable energy supply target compared with other, better scoring cities, and has a waste management system that does the bare minimum. Leeds also has a comprehensive waste reduction strategy.

Rome ranked towards the end of the index

Coming in near the end of the index was the Italian capital Rome, which was ranked joint 44th. Although this disappointing showing may be partly due to poor disclosure, there was no evidence of a policy to improve the energy efficiency of buildings or increase the number of green areas. Targets were not found for renewables as a proportion of energy supply or for net zero carbon. 

“The Index is important because it ranks the European cities that will provide their inhabitants with a high quality of life, whilst minimising environmental impact,” said Hugo Machin.

“This is in accordance with the United Nations’ Sustainable Development Goal 11. The index shows which cities are implementing policies which will help the transformation to a low carbon future. It also shows areas where elected representatives fall short in minimising environmental impact.”

“The Schroders European Sustainable Cities Index has been constructed using research of city-level policies, Hugo Machin said. “Our research was reliant on the level of disclosure provided by city councils, and therefore we would like to provide a disclaimer that there may be policies in place that we are not aware of.”

See the top 20 cities in the index here


The views and opinions contained herein are those of the Authors, and may not necessarily represent views expressed or reflected in other Schroders communications, strategies or funds.


This document is intended to be for information purposes only. The material is not intended as an offer or solicitation for the purchase or sale of any financial instrument. The material is not intended to provide, and should not be relied on for, accounting, legal or tax advice, or investment recommendations. Information herein is believed to be reliable but Schroders does not warrant its completeness or accuracy. No responsibility can be accepted for errors of fact or opinion. Reliance should not be placed on the views and information in the document when taking individual investment and/or strategic decisions.


Past performance is not a reliable indicator of future results, prices of shares and the income from them may fall as well as rise and investors may not get back the amount originally invested.


Schroders has expressed its own views in this document and these may change (to be used if the 1st statement above is not being used).


Schroders will be a data controller in respect of your personal data. For information on how Schroders might process your personal data, please view our Privacy Policy available at or on request should you not have access to this webpage.


Issued by Schroder Investment Management (Europe) S.A., 5, rue Höhenhof, L-1736 Senningerberg, Luxembourg. Registered No. B 37.799. For your security, communications may be taped or monitored


The forecasts stated in the document are the result of statistical modelling, based on a number of assumptions. Forecasts are subject to a high level of uncertainty regarding future economic and market factors that may affect actual future performance. The forecasts are provided to you for information purposes as at today’s date. Our assumptions may change materially with changes in underlying assumptions that may occur, among other things, as economic and market conditions change. We assume no obligation to provide you with updates or changes to this data as assumptions, economic and market conditions, models or other matters change.