How climate change may impact financial markets
How climate change may impact financial markets
Each year Schroders’ economics and multi-asset teams join forces to produce 30-year return forecasts for a range of asset classes around the world. Until now, these forecasts have been agnostic on the subject of climate change, making no explicit adjustments for the physical and transition costs associated with global warming.
Ultimately, the potential channels through which climate change could impact growth and financial returns are too numerous, and indeed often unknown, for us to hope to model every moving part, particularly considering data constraints in poorer economies. Instead, we adopt a three step process.
The first step is a focus on what happens to output as temperatures rise, which we will refer to as the ‘physical cost’ of climate change. The second considers the economic impact of steps taken to mitigate those temperature increases, or the ‘transition cost’. This second step is slightly more complicated, in that there are a range of possible transition scenarios. Finally, we adjust for the effects of stranded assets. This is where we take account of the losses incurred where oil and other carbon based forms of energy have to be written off, as it is no longer possible to make use of them, such that they are left in the ground.
Notable throughout is the range of uncertainty, not only around the economic relationships but also policy responses. The choice of economic model, carbon price and the use of funds raised by a carbon tax all have material consequences for the final estimate. While we do alight on a central scenario, it would be remiss of us not to acknowledge the wide range of possible outcomes around this baseline.
Physical cost assumptions
First, considering the modelling of the physical impact, a non-linear relationship between temperature and productivity seems more plausible than a linear one. With temperatures much above 35 degrees Celsius, for example, the human body simply cannot function for long. Meanwhile, Russia and Canada are already enjoying benefits of a warmer world as the Arctic becomes more navigable. For this reason, we will take the Burke and Tanutama (2019) results as our assumption for the physical cost modelling. We then need to decide which iteration of their model we want to use. The authors ran models allowing for lagged effects as well as one in which contemporaneous impacts only were considered. Again, to us, a lagged relationship makes more sense. We are used to allowing 12 to 18 months for monetary policy to feed through, and responses to warmer temperatures are also likely to take time to fully play out.
Transition cost assumptions
Secondly, we need to make an assumption about the likely policy response. Inevitably, political calculations will at least partially drive the decision made by policymakers, rather than economic concerns over efficiency or climate-driven concerns over the degree of warming. Ultimately, we arrive at the conclusion that while we may see the adoption of a carbon tax, ‘optimal’ pricing may prove too expensive – both financially and politically – leading to suboptimal pricing and climate outcomes. This seems particularly likely when we consider that major economies face little short term incentive to reduce emissions, as many benefit from a warmer world.
Any security(s) mentioned above is for illustrative purpose only, not a recommendation to invest or divest.
This document is intended to be for information purposes only and it is not intended as promotional material in any respect. The views and opinions contained herein are those of the author(s), and do not necessarily represent views expressed or reflected in other Schroders communications, strategies or funds. The material is not intended to provide, and should not be relied on for investment advice or recommendation. Opinions stated are matters of judgment, which may change. Information herein is believed to be reliable, but Schroder Investment Management (Hong Kong) Limited does not warrant its completeness or accuracy.
Investment involves risks. Past performance and any forecasts are not necessarily a guide to future or likely performance. You should remember that the value of investments can go down as well as up and is not guaranteed. Exchange rate changes may cause the value of the overseas investments to rise or fall. For risks associated with investment in securities in emerging and less developed markets, please refer to the relevant offering document.
The information contained in this document is provided for information purpose only and does not constitute any solicitation and offering of investment products. Potential investors should be aware that such investments involve market risk and should be regarded as long-term investments.
Derivatives carry a high degree of risk and should only be considered by sophisticated investors.
This material including the website has not been reviewed by the SFC. Issued by Schroder Investment Management (Hong Kong) Limited.
- Infographic: Sustainability Report Q3 2020
- The transaction costs manual: our "how to" guide to a complex topic
- Why investors should stay positive on China
- Will decarbonisation be the mega-trend of the next decade?
- How to cope with rock bottom corporate bond yields?
- Chinese bonds and equities strategy in the second half of 2020