Perspective - Economics
What the “prisoner’s dilemma” tells us about climate change
Game theory can help explain why action on climate change has been slow, but as protests worldwide gain momentum and interest in climate change grows, we could be nearing a tipping point.
25 June 2019
The prisoner’s dilemma is a well-known framework in game theory, which is the study of how and why people cooperate or compete with each other.
According to the prisoner's dilemma, rational individuals might not cooperate even though it would be in their combined best interests to do so. By prioritising their personal interests, individuals acting rationally can create a worse overall result.
In the context of global climate change, the prisoner’s dilemma has become more relevant than ever.
It helps us understand why nations across the world have postponed actions to limit further temperature rise for such a long time, despite scientists’ warnings of the risks ahead.
Climate change is a global problem, which requires individual action by many people, companies and countries around the world. The costs are global and result from the world’s collective actions. They will also affect future generations far more than today’s. Because the actions required are disruptive, most people will choose to let others take the strain, leaving the global problem unaddressed.
Over the recent past, however, the payoffs associated with each player’s action have started to change. The costs of taking action have fallen and the benefits of addressing climate risks have become clearer. That has prompted an increasing proportion of the global population to forego self-interest and choose collaboration.
One prominent manifestation of this is the rise in public protests drawing attention to climate change on a global scale. The Fridays-for-Future movement initiated by Swedish teenager Greta Thunberg resulted in over 2000 protests in 125 countries in a single day, demonstrating the increasing demand for solutions among younger people.
The recent Extinction Rebellion protests in several European cities are another example of people’s choice to collaborate instead of putting self-interest first. The 10-day protest was a forceful call for political action and collaboration on an unprecedented scale.
Google searches for "climate change" worldwide
Source: Google Trends, May 2019
The Google Trends data above also confirms the attention climate change attracts. The trend line in “climate change” searches has historically been flat, albeit with seasonal peaks and troughs, and the spike during the much-publicised Bonn Climate Change Conference in May 2017. But over the past 12 months it has been steadily growing.
Time will tell, but we believe a tipping point may be approaching. In game theory, the solution to the prisoner’s dilemma framework changes when time and repetition are considered. As costs and benefits change, collaboration becomes the optimal solution for rational actors. The sight of school children and older generations on the streets, demanding action, may prove the start of a snap back from the world’s political apparatus.
You can find more of our sustainability insights here.
Important Information: This communication is marketing material. The views and opinions contained herein are those of the author(s) on this page, and may not necessarily represent views expressed or reflected in other Schroders communications, strategies or funds. This material is intended to be for information purposes only and is not intended as promotional material in any respect. The material is not intended as an offer or solicitation for the purchase or sale of any financial instrument. It is not intended to provide and should not be relied on for accounting, legal or tax advice, or investment recommendations. Reliance should not be placed on the views and information in this document when taking individual investment and/or strategic decisions. Past performance is not a reliable indicator of future results. The value of an investment can go down as well as up and is not guaranteed. All investments involve risks including the risk of possible loss of principal. Information herein is believed to be reliable but Schroders does not warrant its completeness or accuracy. Some information quoted was obtained from external sources we consider to be reliable. No responsibility can be accepted for errors of fact obtained from third parties, and this data may change with market conditions. This does not exclude any duty or liability that Schroders has to its customers under any regulatory system. Regions/ sectors shown for illustrative purposes only and should not be viewed as a recommendation to buy/sell. The opinions in this material include some forecasted views. We believe we are basing our expectations and beliefs on reasonable assumptions within the bounds of what we currently know. However, there is no guarantee than any forecasts or opinions will be realised. These views and opinions may change. To the extent that you are in North America, this content is issued by Schroder Investment Management North America Inc., an indirect wholly owned subsidiary of Schroders plc and SEC registered adviser providing asset management products and services to clients in the US and Canada. For all other users, this content is issued by Schroder Investment Management Limited, 1 London Wall Place, London EC2Y 5AU. Registered No. 1893220 England. Authorised and regulated by the Financial Conduct Authority.