The primary reason for media companies’ existence is not, as some people continue to believe, to provide information but, rather, to encourage us to buy their newspapers and magazines, visit their websites and so on.
Over the years this has led to the increasing use of more sensationalist or emotive language – and this has inevitably spilled over into the coverage of business and finance.
To take one simple example, consider share prices, which a few years back tended to ‘rise’ or ‘fall’ but these days are just as likely to ‘soar’ or ‘plummet’. Such instances only add to the ‘noise’ that, as we have discussed before in articles such as Flight to quality, makes it so hard for people to look at global events and concretely use this information to work out how best to invest.
It is why markets have in recent years been known to fall 3% one day and rise 3% the next and why, if scientists were doing an experiment about investment, they would find a way to compensate for the noise or tune it out completely. Within the actual investment community, however, noise is as likely to be revered as removed and to be used to characterise a debate or drive it forward. That is rarely helpful.
Say, for example, you have identified a promising value investment but the market is falling. In the back of your mind you will be thinking that, unless you chance to buy the shares at the very bottom – which is most improbable – you will lose money on your investment before you start making it.
According to the behavioural finance concept of ‘loss aversion’, people feel the pain of loss far more acutely than they enjoy the pleasure of gain – and that perception is only heightened by the emotional language increasingly being used in investment today.
As value investors, we often talk in terms of a company’s shares trading at a certain multiple or valuation but a fall in valuation from a multiple of four to a multiple of two becomes a whole lot more significant the moment emotion enters the equation. That can be scary for investors – including value investors because emotion creates volatility and that can make life difficult for everyone.
Fund Manager, Equity Value
I joined Schroders in 2001, initially working as part of the Pan European research team providing insight and analysis on a broad range of sectors from Transport and Aerospace to Mining and Chemicals. In 2006, Kevin Murphy and I took over management of a fund that seeks to identify and exploit deeply out of favour investment opportunities. In 2010, Kevin and I also took over management of the team's flagship UK value fund seeking to offer income and capital growth.
The views and opinions displayed are those of Nick Kirrage, Andrew Lyddon, Kevin Murphy, Andrew Williams, Andrew Evans, Simon Adler, Juan Torres Rodriguez, Liam Nunn, Vera German and Roberta Barr, members of the Schroder Global Value Equity Team (the Value Perspective Team), and other independent commentators where stated.
They do not necessarily represent views expressed or reflected in other Schroders' communications, strategies or funds. The Team has expressed its own views and opinions on this website and these may change.
This article is intended to be for information purposes only and it is not intended as promotional material in any respect. Reliance should not be placed on the views and information on the website when taking individual investment and/or strategic decisions. Nothing in this article should be construed as advice. The sectors/securities shown above are for illustrative purposes only and are not to be considered a recommendation to buy/sell.
Past performance is not a guide to future performance and may not be repeated. The value of investments and the income from them may go down as well as up and investors may not get back the amounts originally invested.