This too shall pass: A non-political take on Brexit

It is not only possible to take a non-political view on Brexit – investors should actively be working to remove their personal opinions from the decision-making process


Kevin Murphy

Kevin Murphy

Co-head Global Value Team

Hero image

Value investors do everything they can to keep emotion out of the decision-making process, striving to tune out subjective feelings and focus instead on objective data – even with an issue as highly-charged as Brexit.  We will take it as read many visitors to The Value Perspective will have strong opinions here one way or the other but, far from looking to antagonise anyone, we would argue it is possible to take a non-political view.

Regardless of where you stand on Brexit, it is hard to deny the question of whether or not the UK is part of the European Union is one of enormous political and macroeconomic significance. Just how significant – and indeed whether the political or macroeconomic element turns out to be the bigger concern – time will tell but, for a degree of perspective, investors can at least analyse the impact other historic episodes had on markets.

The following chart does just that, considering how the UK stockmarket fared one, three and five years after a dozen other significant political and macroeconomic events. These range from 1978’s Winter of Discontent through the Gulf and Iraq wars, the 11 September terrorist attacks and the collapse of Lehman Brothers to the referendum on Scottish independence in 2014.


As you can see, even after 12 months, markets were in positive territory in most instances – though not all. While the one-year pattern is mixed, however, for patient investors with a longer-term outlook – that is to say, with a three to five-year view – the outcome is very clear. With all of the momentous events listed – and we can hardly be accused of cherry-picking – markets showed positive longer-term performance.

The reason for this is that the stockmarket is intended to be a mechanism for anticipating the impact of big events and pricing in their potential impact in advance of them happening – providing, of course, that is possible. Investors had some opportunity to prepare themselves for the pound leaving the European Exchange Rate Mechanism, for example, but clearly not for the 11 September attacks.

As soon as such events have happened, however, the market is then meant to start looking through any current difficulty and assess what the future might hold once a more normal environment returns – what impacts might be temporary and what might be permanent? Thus, while the memories of what has taken place will of course endure, markets and economies do adapt; they factor in what has happened, they process the implications and they begin to recover.

So what does that mean for investors now? Well, regardless of the underlying reasons – concerns over the ramifications of Brexit would be one potential explanation – there is one fact about markets today that is not open to debate: as things stand, the UK is trading on one of the lowest valuations of all the world’s developed markets. The market has moved to anticipate potential problems – whether it has done so sufficiently, time will tell.

As we have explained many times, however, here on The Value Perspective, in articles such as Why value investing works, if you buy cheap companies then, on average and over the longer term, you will make money and, if you buy expensive companies then, on average and over the longer term, you will not.

That fundamental principle of value investing holds true – irrespective of anyone’s personal views on Brexit. As such, while the macroeconomic, societal and political impacts of Brexit are yet to be fully revealed, we are rather less worried about its market impact than all the media headlines would appear to demand.

As a Brexit-related postscript on objective facts and subjective feelings, here is an interesting little trivia question: of the 51 front-bench MPs in place at the time of the EU referendum in June 2016, how many are still in place today? At the time of writing the answer is nine. That is the fact – our feelings about the corporate governance of any business that saw more than 80% turnover on its board in just three years, we will leave to your imagination.


Kevin Murphy

Kevin Murphy

Co-head Global Value Team

I joined Schroders in 2000 as an  Pan European equity analyst with a focus on construction and building materials.  In 2010, Nick and I took over management of the team's flagship UK value fund seeking to offer income and capital growth. I manage UK Income and UK Recovery funds.

Important Information:

The views and opinions displayed are those of Nick Kirrage, Andrew Lyddon, Kevin Murphy, Andrew Williams, Andrew Evans, Simon Adler, Juan Torres Rodriguez, Liam Nunn, Vera German and Roberta Barr, members of the Schroder Global Value Equity Team (the Value Perspective Team), and other independent commentators where stated.

They do not necessarily represent views expressed or reflected in other Schroders' communications, strategies or funds. The Team has expressed its own views and opinions on this website and these may change.

This article is intended to be for information purposes only and it is not intended as promotional material in any respect. Reliance should not be placed on the views and information on the website when taking individual investment and/or strategic decisions. Nothing in this article should be construed as advice. The sectors/securities shown above are for illustrative purposes only and are not to be considered a recommendation to buy/sell.

Past performance is not a guide to future performance and may not be repeated. The value of investments and the income from them may go down as well as up and investors may not get back the amounts originally invested.